article: Is there any reproductive future left for men?

[MatureDJ]

Europe PMC

Europe PMC is an archive of life sciences journal literature.

europepmc.org

According to Germaine Greer, an Australian academic, journalist and feminist author of ‘The Female Eunuch’, legendary for her quotes (see at http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Greer,_Germaine) men are pointless when it comes to reproduction. ‘A society can survive with only one man, no society will survive a shortage of women’. Mrs. Greer also has some ideas about spermatogenesis: ‘Because you are a man, you do something as colossally stupid as figuring out a way to generate sperm from cells’.

Probably with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) on her mind, she even argued: ‘If you are fool enough to produce 40 million sperm at each ejaculation you’d have to be aware that all but one or two of you are surplus to requirements’. And for the researchers interested in male infertility and spermatogenesis she also has an important message: ‘With the whole world bathed in gadzillions of dying sperm, a bunch of men have wasted valuable research funding in figuring out a very costly way to whip up a few dozen more’.

my opinion:

 

[MoMoses]

According to Germaine Greer, an Australian academic, journalist and feminist author

Sorry. Stopped reading there.. let's not feed this feminist troll. She's probably very unattractive and therefor bitter

Edit: I googled her! Gentleman, behold! I hope you didn't just eat because the barf reflex in great in this one. I present to you the Loch Ness Monster!

 

[bat soup]

I doubt there´s any reproductive future for her.

Also, whilst she pontificates about how men are not required, who exactly is defending her country's borders? What does she think would happen if the men disappeared and the surrounding nations had free access to it´s territory?

In her ideal scenario there would be only one man and yet women could still have as many children as they want. Let´s take a moment to think about what would actually happen if this was ever the case. Firstly, that man would discard all of the fat, ugly, short haired, masculine and feminist women. He wouldn't want to have sex with them. His sperm would sell for millions of dollars and he would have a harem of young hot women which he could use at will and then dispose of as soon as he got tired of them. These pregnant women would then be kicked out of the palace and left to fend for themselves.

Or does she advocate forcibly stealing a man´s sperm? Is that her utopia? Otherwise, he might decide that he didn't want to sell his sperm to spawn a generation of ugly bastard children and in that case, I think all of the barren women would organize a revolution against the feminists and they´d end up on the guillotine.

So I think she´s advocating mass murder, genocide and torture in order to raise a whole society of bastard children. This is what happens when you let them out of the kitchen.

 

[Georgepithyou]

So I think she´s advocating mass murder, genocide and torture in order to raise a whole society of bastard children. This is what happens when you let them out of the kitchen.

It's amazing that she faces no consequences for advocating genocide for an entire gender, but someone posts something slightly conservative and they are cancelled immediately.

If you told someone in the 1950s that this is what would happen to the world, they would have laughed at you

 

[rjc149]

Yes my morning dose of outrage porn on Sosuave while I’m taking a coffee sh!t.

 

[Who Dares Win]

It's amazing that she faces no consequences for advocating genocide for an entire gender, but someone posts something slightly conservative and they are cancelled immediately.

If you told someone in the 1950s that this is what would happen to the world, they would have laughed at you

In the 50s? we should have told to the world in the 40s or better yet late 30s.