ImTheDoubleGreatest!
Master Don Juan
I'm talking about in general, not specifically in bed. Like is it easier to make them laugh, smile, have them talk to you, open up, etc.? And if so, why?
She says the movie looks dumb; you suddenly agree. She tests you with a little attitude; you apologize for nothing.
You think you're being easy to get along with. She reads something else entirely: a man with no edges. Nothing to hold on to. No friction, no tension, no reason to wonder what he really thinks.
The "22 Rules" taught me to push back — playfully, calmly, without needing her approval. Strange things happened after that.
Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.
Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?
You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.
Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.
I know that you are easily pissed off by me neil, but do not hijack my thread. This was a genuine question based on an experience I just had several hours ago. Don't like me? Put me on ignore. Otherwise, either add to this discussion or don't comment on it at all.OP is asking if he'll be able to date women who have hard-working fathers who aren't on welfare??
Short answer: NO. Get a job.
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
I am asking a valid question: if sheltered women come from rich families, are you acknowledging money makes a difference in how children are raised? If so, could there be a chance that women want to raise sheltered children and thus prefer rich men?I know that you are easily pissed off by me neil, but do not hijack my thread. This was a genuine question based on an experience I just had several hours ago. Don't like me? Put me on ignore. Otherwise, either add to this discussion or don't comment on it at all.
I'm the one asking questions here Neil, this is my thread. You answer my question or contribute to the discussion or get the hell out.Want to piss off SS members? Tell them to get a job.
You'll know you've reached the Zone when members of SS actually create accounts specifically to hide their identity and take jabs at you.
I am asking a valid question: if sheltered women come from rich families, are you acknowledging money makes a difference in how children are raised? If so, could there be a chance that women want to raise sheltered children and thus prefer rich men?