The phenomenon of the 'sexless/settled for' marriage is really worth considering in more detail. It is both the blackest of black pills and also quite freeing for those who are FA. The reason I say this is that many FA's might think they if they were born 20, 30 ect...years previous in the pre-tinder pre-peak-hypergamy age, they'd have found themselves an adoring wife who was eager to have sex with them.....well all the evidence points to the fact that even in the 'good days' this was often not the case. There is a silent epidemic as far as I can see of non-attractive (i.e. non-chad) men who settle into sexless or sex-as-rare-reward marriages (i.e. they never actually experience enthusiastic sex). And I think this has always been the case, and I think before the internet perhaps these men didn't know any better, i.e. they didn't know the kind of lives that the top few percent of Chad's were living. So I guess what I'm saying is that the new sexual marketplace that shifts someone from the "I'll settle for him when I'm 30" category, into "I'm never going to settle", leaving the man as an FA is maybe actually a good thing for the dude. At least he's free. He's not the stereotypical henpecked husband. More and more I think the acid test of one's actual attractiveness is during your youth, 15-25, when people form relationships without performance-related strings attached i.e. buy this house, car, have x amount of kids with me, earn this much.....they just enjoy spending time and having sex with each other. Going without during those years and then suddenly becoming interesting when you're 35 and own a house, a property and have a decent job....well it should be enough to make any thinking man rightfully cynical.
