So she told you she likes you but wouldn't go out with you. Or she said you were good looking but then wouldn't kiss you. In those cases we apply one of the most important DJ rules: Always go by what a women DOES and not what she SAYS. (Actions speak louder than words).
However, one thing I've noticed is that the actual application of the rule seems to only apply when it's negative. In the (not unlikely) case(s) where she says she doesn't want to have sex but does anyway (or similar examples), shouldn't we apply the same rule but in a positive way? If it were someone else she said she didn't like but still slept with anyway, we'd certainly apply the rule then, but what about when it's us she reverses her position for?
Or is the rule actually "Apply the WORST of what she says and does"? That seems like the wrong attitude IMO.
Do you have any examples of this rule being applied in a good way? Although I have many such examples I find that I still dwell on the negative aspect of her duality.
However, one thing I've noticed is that the actual application of the rule seems to only apply when it's negative. In the (not unlikely) case(s) where she says she doesn't want to have sex but does anyway (or similar examples), shouldn't we apply the same rule but in a positive way? If it were someone else she said she didn't like but still slept with anyway, we'd certainly apply the rule then, but what about when it's us she reverses her position for?
Or is the rule actually "Apply the WORST of what she says and does"? That seems like the wrong attitude IMO.
Do you have any examples of this rule being applied in a good way? Although I have many such examples I find that I still dwell on the negative aspect of her duality.
