80% of women are fvcking the top 20% of men is ridiculous.

[zekko]

I have to get back to what I said earlier (post #5), that the guys I know who get laid the most are just the ones who are the biggest horndogs. They're not renaissance men at all, they're just decent looking guys who are very horny, and very focused on getting pvssy. They don't have a bunch of hobbies that they're passionate about, like they say on this forum, mostly what they think about is how they can get into the pants of that new pretty girl who just walked in the door.

When we think of DJs, we tend to think of guys like George Clooney, guys who have high status and are classy, but have a womanizing streak. Those are guys who could be out there banging 80% (or more) of the women, but they're not necessarily the ones out there doing it, if you catch my meaning.

The point is, I don't think the top 10% elite most desireable guys are all necessarily out chasing pvssy. Some no doubt are, but some surely have their minds on more important things. These guys are getting laid, but they're not necessarily interested in racking up numbers.

 

[VladPatton]

I have to get back to what I said earlier (post #5), that the guys I know who get laid the most are just the ones who are the biggest horndogs. They're not renaissance men at all, they're just decent looking guys who are very horny, and very focused on getting pvssy. They don't have a bunch of hobbies that they're passionate about, like they say on this forum, mostly what they think about is how they can get into the pants of that new pretty girl who just walked in the door.

When we think of DJs, we tend to think of guys like George Clooney, guys who have high status and are classy, but have a womanizing streak. Those are guys who could be out there banging 80% (or more) of the women, but they're not necessarily the ones out there doing it, if you catch my meaning.

The point is, I don't think the top 10% elite most desireable guys are all necessarily out chasing pvssy. Some no doubt are, but some surely have their minds on more important things. These guys are getting laid, but they're not necessarily interested in racking up numbers.

Exactly, it's a byproduct of their status. All of the "cool dudes" that I've met who get laid left and right were a no-talent, hobby-less, skill-less, bunch that literally banged anything with 2 tits, a whole, and a heart beat. To me, that's no great life accomplishment. Knock yourselves out. If their dıcks would stop working their lives would crumble around them.

 

[djjizzyjeff]

jizzyjeff,

While this is not meant to be insulting in any way, if you spent even a portion of your time in that top 20%, you would know this to be absolute fact.


Although I would say that 20% of the men are getting 80% of the sex is a better metric.


Your biggest mistake is around the math, if that is your deciding factor as it appears to be. Let's be honest, the average AFC is lucky to get sex once every couple of months. To beat that, the 20% only need to have sex 5 times in two months. But they get it much more than that.

For every four beta chodes out there pulling his pud and thinking girls are pristine creatures based on his never getting any, there is one guy that girls actually WANT to sleep with, and send him subtle and not so subtle signals of their interest.

Be that one guy and your eyes will open to the reality.

20% of men are getting 80% of the sex? As in 20% of men spend 80% of their lives only involving getting sex and women? I'm not buying it. Not even porn star dudes, athletes, successful businessmen, or even "PUA's" who are too busy doing their huckster seminars and thinking of the next BS scam are spening 80% of their lives getting laid.


Please. Who on here knows anyone who is getting 80% of sex in his life from top quality chicks...they aren't even getting all uggs. You'd literally have to have no life at all but chicks to which you'd have something seriously wrong with you.

Hell not even John Mayer or Adam Levine (who most chicks seem to dig even though AL seems like a phag) get 80% of the sex in their lives. There's simply not enough time.

Now you could say 80% of the women they meet want to fvck them but in reality there simply isn't enough time with a person who has a LIFE.

If you don't have a LIFE but women then that dude is not a top male but a friggin loser.

Chicks talk. Dudes talk. I know many many people. You'd hear about some dude who spends his life getting practically every chick for sex.

Now I know dudes who have gotten laid a lot. And they aren't what I'd call the richest, most handsome, or highest status...and know dudes who're much better looking than them who've gotten far less...and they aren't "AFC" in the least because they have many other things going on in life.

I've been many places in life. More than most. and some several times. Hell I get approached even moreso now than when I was younger. (Mostly because I was too busy getting in trouble back then.) that stil doesn't mean I'm the best in looks, money, or status. Hell even If I'd banged tons of chicks which I know dudes who have...they have far less going on than dudes with much more things going for them in life and they have banged a lot of whales, uggs,complete sloots, hookers, or had fun in some seedy massage parlor. Hardly what I'd call a top level male.

 

[zekko]

All of the "cool dudes" that I've met who get laid left and right were a no-talent, hobby-less, skill-less, bunch that literally banged anything with 2 tits, a whole, and a heart beat.

Yeah, I forgot to mention that. The guys I was talking about were not very picky. They would bang some of the most horrible looking wildebeests I have ever seen. But then they would turn around and pull a genuine hottie just as quickly. They'd take whatever was available to them at the time.

 

[Fatal Jay]

I believe this to be true, just look at single moms out there, the one guy is banging multiple chicks and getting them pregnant.

This is mos def true in the black community.

 

[djjizzyjeff]

Clearly there is a comprehension problem here.

Who said men are spending 80% of their lives getting sex? Where are you coming up with that figure?

20% of men getting 80% of the sex has nothing to do with how much time people are spending fvking. Are you saying that all men are doing an equal amount of fvking as other men?






I don't get it, why are you confusing different elements? Nobody is saying that 20% of men are fvking during 80% of their lives. Where are you getting this?

According to the seduction community there is supposedly some top 20% of men getting 80% of the action almost referring to these top 20% getting laid by practically every chick who crosses their path while everyone else gets no where hear their amount.

I could care less if some dude who God knows who that is to qualify for some "ultimate male" bangs anything he can. That doesn't mean in the least he's a "top male".

I get the basic jist of it. Like 20% do most of the banging while others get far less.