63-Year-Old Woman to have a baby???!!

[DJDamage]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060504/ap_on_he_me/pregnant_at63_1

That is crazy. She had to use fertility treatment to have this kid because her body wouldn't allow her through natural ways (big shock).

When you are too old you are too old. There are already increasing health risks for the baby when a woman gives birth in her late 30's so imagine what will be for a 63 year old woman!!!??

DJD

 

[Joe The Homophobe]

ok so a woman has the right to butcher a baby because its "her body" (according to baby kilers) but she can't have a baby if she is too old? wtf? i thought we werent supposed to interfere with what women "do with their body"

 

[check_mate_kid_uk]

The point is she is 63, when that child is 12 years old she will be 75 and in no fit state to start running around after a child. Going by average life expectancy she will be dea before the kid goes to university.

Often if a kid if unfortuante enough to loose both parents, his uncle or aunt may look after him, but this childs aunts and uncles will be equaly old asuming he has any. Whos going to look after him? a niece/newphew? no hes going to go in to foster care at the age of 14.

That is why the women should not be allowed to do this.

 

[Scrumtulescence]

ok so a woman has the right to butcher a baby because its "her body" (according to baby kilers)

Hey, smartass, fetus != baby. Nice try though.

 

[avrilishot]

That is so ****ed up, I would be mad if my mom had me at 63.

She will most likey be dead in 20 years. how dumb.