Its clear she wasnt attracted to him. Move along.

Charm said:

Its clear she wasnt attracted to him. Move along.

Click to expand...

no lets not, althoug it is totally clear shes not attracted to him, but this is an observation which is evidence which should not be ignored. It points out my theory as right, and that the "looks dont matter" as wrong.

Its evidence, shouldnt be ignored! Its crucial to this core discussion

God_of_getting_layed said:

no lets not, althoug it is totally clear shes not attracted to him, but this is an observation which is evidence which should not be ignored. It points out my theory as right, and that the "looks dont matter" as wrong.

Its evidence, shouldnt be ignored! Its crucial to this core discussion

Click to expand...

Well, this is an interesting study in psychology, selective perception and self-limiting beliefs.

Where people hold certain beliefs and forcefit their perception of the world to fit that. People see what they wanna see. And ignore or make excuses for what they don't...

Everytime Deus sees an ugly guy with a decent-looking girl, he says see...I'm right! And everytime he sees an ugly guy getting rejected by a girl, he says it was due to his game, not looks.

~~~~~ REALITY CHECK NOW ~~~~~

When you look at the TOP ALPHA FEMALES in American pop culture and who they consistently choose to date though, it generally boils down to a trifactor of:

1) GOOD LOOKS
2) BIG D!CK
3) FAME/STATUS

That's why the same handful of top Hollywood "it girls" like Paris Hilton, Pamela Anderson, Lindsay Lohan, Mandy Moore, Jennifer Love Hewitt, Olsen twins, etc. all rotate through the same handful of guys:

Tommy Lee - rock star with probably ~8" rod
Wilmer Valderrama - suave-looking shytcom actor who claims to be slightly >8"
Jared Leto - pretty boy actor with allegedly big rod
Rick Solomon - wealthy heir with what appears to be a 7"+ rod
Colin Farrell - star actor with what appears to be >7" rod
Kevin Federline - good-looking guy (size unknown)

Sorry guys, but that's the real secret to getting chicks and probably hasn't changed in 5000 years. You'll notice as each of those 3 variables increases, so does the hotness and number of their gf's. And without those 3, you will have a hard time attracting and keeping the top "it girls." But with them, you can almost do no wrong...

NEWSFLASH - These girls always date good-looking guys! You never see them with a fug! I'll never say never, but certainly statistically, they date decent-looking guys the vast majority of the time!

wayword said:

...That's why the same handful of top Hollywood "it girls" like Paris Hilton, Pamela Anderson, Lindsay Lohan, Mandy Moore, Jennifer Love Hewitt, Olsen twins, etc. all rotate through the same handful of guys:

Tommy Lee - rock star with probably ~8" rod
Wilmer Valderrama - suave-looking shytcom actor who claims to be slightly >8"
Jared Leto - pretty boy actor with allegedly big rod
Rick Solomon - wealthy heir with what appears to be a 7"+ rod
Colin Farrell - star actor with what appears to be >7" rod
Kevin Federline - good-looking guy (size unknown)

Click to expand...

Alright, given that your specific example is true, it also leads to the assumption that people who put a heavy emphasis on looks have a terrible time staying in a relationship. I have no idea whether the size of their unit has anything to do with it and I'm surprised that anyone could find such statistics (or bothered to look it up).

wayword said:

Everytime Deus sees an ugly guy with a decent-looking girl, he says see...I'm right! And everytime he sees an ugly guy getting rejected by a girl, he says it was due to his game, not looks.

Click to expand...

you got that right!

~~~~~ REALITY CHECK NOW ~~~~~

When you look at the TOP ALPHA FEMALES in American pop culture and who they consistently choose to date though, it generally boils down to a trifactor of:

1) GOOD LOOKS
2) BIG D!CK
3) FAME/STATUS

Click to expand...

this is accurate too, #3 means she's a gold digger. one of the oldest professions in the world.

That's why the same handful of top Hollywood "it girls" like Paris Hilton, Pamela Anderson, Lindsay Lohan, Mandy Moore, Jennifer Love Hewitt, Olsen twins, etc. all rotate through the same handful of guys:

Tommy Lee - rock star with probably ~8" rod
Wilmer Valderrama - suave-looking shytcom actor who claims to be slightly >8"
Jared Leto - pretty boy actor with allegedly big rod
Rick Solomon - wealthy heir with what appears to be a 7"+ rod
Colin Farrell - star actor with what appears to be >7" rod
Kevin Federline - good-looking guy (size unknown)

Sorry guys, but that's the real secret to getting chicks and probably hasn't changed in 5000 years. You'll notice as each of those 3 variables increases, so does the hotness and number of their gf's. And without those 3, you will have a hard time attracting and keeping the top "it girls." But with them, you can almost do no wrong...

Click to expand...

again accurate. Though, Id say colin farrell is more known for being good looking than having a big rod. I cant count how many times Ive heard women say they wanna fvck him cuz hes soo hot. and colins a slvt too, he gets so much ass..its no wonder.

NEWSFLASH - These girls always date good-looking guys! You never see them with a fug! I'll never say never, but certainly statistically, they date decent-looking guys the vast majority of the time!

Click to expand...

yep, your so right, you understand it. Although, this is stastically more common with attractive women then fug women, reason being fug often cant get attractive men, so they have to lower their standards as do fug guys; they train themselves to see past looks. I need to point this out because deus and others will take this out of context.

well, we both see it! we are both 2 independant sources that come in agreement, which validates our observations as accurate.

Francisco d'Anconia said:

Alright, given that your specific example is true, it also leads to the assumption that people who put a heavy emphasis on looks have a terrible time staying in a relationship. I have no idea whether the size of their unit has anything to do with it and I'm surprised that anyone could find such statistics (or bothered to look it up).

Click to expand...

actually, I read a study that said that people of equal attractiveness stay together longer than people of un-equal attractiveness. so the hot girl-hot guy will stay together far longer than the hot girl-ugly guy couple will. ugly guy-ugly girl will stay together a long time etc.

Deux sounds like that geeky twit everyone hates who also tries to fight back with sarcasm and wise-crack remarks that deviate from the subject. Face it, God of getting laid is 100% accurate. There needs to be a physical face/body "i'd have sex with him/her" attraction between two straight human beings in order for any interaction to progress.

God of being layed and wayword have destroyed anything u say. And after making statements such as "some girls like to be seen with ugly guys", you forget that THOSE SOME GIRLS ARE THE UGLY ONES. No hot girl will be seen with anyone that she does not want to be seen with on a social level.

Deux - your vibe is that geek who's pissed at the world he lives in and who tries to create his own little reality in order to feel good about himself

God_of_getting_layed said:

well, we both see it! we are both 2 independant sources that come in agreement, which validates our observations as accurate.

Click to expand...

We'll call this the "777" club.

If you are:
1) A 7 or more in looks
2) Have a 7" or bigger d!ck
3) Make $70K or more a year

You are in ELITE company and should be regularly bagging 8s, 9s and even occasional 10s. And not only can you GET these girls, but you can KEEP them at YOUR WILL.

Yes, some PUAs can bluff their way into one-time lays with such women...but lacking these fundamental attributes, can't KEEP them.

Do you realize how hard it is to keep a high-maintenance, hot celeb party girl to stay with you (and loyally)? When they literally have guys hitting on them every 5'! Yet, Vilmer did it with Lohan for like a year, I believe!

Francisco - I reverse-engineered the success of these pimps to figure out what REALLY mattered out in the real world by trying to reduce their equations to their common denominators. Vilmer really had got me curious - since he has done about every A-list "MAXIM" starlet out there now. So, you have to ask what was so great or unique about him...which a little research soon revealed. He EASILY qualifies for the 777 club...and in fact WELL OVERQUALIFIES for it in every aspect (except perhaps looks, which he might "only" be a 7 or 7.5 in). I mean, $70K is NOTHING to this guy! And if he's truly over 8", I believe he's well within the largest 1% of all men!

Now, just excelling in any single factor here would make such guys somewhat desirable - but it's the RARE COMBINATION of ALL 3 - that makes them DEADLY and IRRESISTIBLE to modern women. Especially having it all by their relatively young ages of their mid-20s.

Diux, you are still arguing in this thread!! I thought I told you to find a life.

LOL WTF is your point, you have like 100 posts in this thread.

you have no life cause you post epic essays on this forum, sorry you're ugly

God_of_getting_layed said:

actually, I read a study that said that people of equal attractiveness stay together longer than people of un-equal attractiveness. so the hot girl-hot guy will stay together far longer than the hot girl-ugly guy couple will. ugly guy-ugly girl will stay together a long time etc.

Click to expand...

There is truth to that but it's not based solely on looks, it's based on the confidence (or comfort) that a person has when dating someone that they feel is their equal. The easiest judgement on that is looks but it also includes their social and economic levels.

Consider the guys that have posted in the forum about feeling weird that their woman makes more money than them or that she has more friends and she is more social than him. Even though she would invite him along and would pay his way, he would feel wierd about it.

wayword said:

We'll call this the "777" club.

If you are:
1) A 7 or more in looks
2) Have a 7" or bigger d!ck
3) Make $70K or more a year

Click to expand...

I'm in!

Deus ex Pianoforte said:

Careful now, Francisco...don't want to make too much sense here or anything. Don't want any looks-are-everything folks to get hurt.

Click to expand...

Damn logic getting in the fvcking way all the time... :cuss:

Deux i just saw your pics - you do realize that the girls in those pics with you are very ugly right? (1 of them is cute, the other 2 hideous).

Deus ex Pianoforte said:

Good news for all you looks-are-everything guys demanding my pics/denouncing me as an ugly troll determined to design a new reality for myself! My co-worker just sent me a couple pics from some parties we've had. I'm the dude in the red shirt and Stones shirt with the goofy drunken expression on his face. Sorry there's no shirtless pics, but I'd be glad to hook you up with those if you keep it up with the "fat" accusations. Now if I could just get my freakin' camera to link up with my computer...

http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r2/saynotokrypto/tedshouse.jpg

http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r2/saynotokrypto/lannysbirthday.jpg

Click to expand...

And which ones are you actually fuxxoring?

Unless it's the pretty one with straight, dark hair, this only further proves the point that people tend to fvck on their own level. Not that you're a horrible-looking guy - you're not a pretty boi but do have some masculine traits - which can compensate for prettier features. Because of that, I'll give you a 6 in looks - which means you likely subsist on a steady diet of 6s and 7s, depending upon all your other attributes.

pimpin IS easy said:

Deux i just saw your pics - you do realize that the girls in those pics with you are very ugly right? (1 of them is cute, the other 2 hideous).

Click to expand...

that's cause LOOKS DON'T MATTER...at least he is not a hypocrit

yea looks don't matter to people who are not good looking....what else is new??

the whole point of this argument (from what i read), is that looks MATTER for those who actually have them!

damn Deus, i just saw your pics. I dont mean to be rude and all but...no wonder you think looks dont matter. are you sure you aren't just hoping looks dont matter?

Deus, you are a weird guy. instead of being like "well these guys are jerks who had nothing relative to say towards the 'looks debate,' you decided to go right back at us. its fine, i guess we deserved it. But come on, why are you so hell bent on getting in the last word? you've got some issues man. maybe going to a "i hate myself" forum would better serve your time.
So i guess there you have it, another "insult attempt" for you to respond to. im starting to think you like it, like its a battle that wages on for you, and you are fighting the good fight....weird. you do use odd terms like "the light side."
oh well, i guess weridos are allowed to use the computer too.