Its crazy **** like this why you should never date or even talk to a Single Mother

[Identikit_Radiohead]

1 - Man, aged 57, go's into large Walmart store to find some cream/medication for his elderly mother.
2 - asks a mommy (aged in her 20's) in a disability scooter if she knows where the cream is.
3 - small kid/toddler falls off moms scooter.
4 - Man, being a good citizen, pics up the toddler and puts the toddler back on the scooter.
5 - man finds medication and thanks the woman in the scooter.

6 - Later on the woman makes a false claim he tried to attempting kidnap of her kid. Police look at CCTV footage and see he didn't try to kidnap, but the cops decide to go after him. They arrest him several days later on a highway, face down and handcuffed.
7 - some evil grand jury woman decides it IS ATTEMPTED KIDNAPPING (and she pretended the video/cctv footage wasn't working in court)
8 - He spends 47 days in jail with daily threats and beatings from "chomo bashers", as well as not having access to his medication for hypertension.

If there was no CCTV to prove his innocence, he could of spent up to 25 years in jail.

Loading…

www.youtube.com

Loading…

edition.cnn.com

 

[quodlibet]

You can't use this one incident of a crazy extortionist to make a sweeping statement about dating single moms. I would never date one but it's just my preference. I'm not even sure what your story has to do with dating.

 

[SpartanWarrior77]

yeah, this is more of a symptom of America's weird cultural and intellectual decline combined with it's out of whack legalistic culture.

 

[Gamisch]

The real problem is that the US still relies on yet another 1700 law instead of upgrading towards a more modern way of operating

Jury of your peers is fun and games untill you get send to prison for decades by some soccer moms who have no idea about the law ( and neither should they).

A modern first world country should want people ij charge who rigorously studied law and operate from a logical point of view. In that case this wouldn't be a thing, or the woman could be punished for false accusations.

Now everything goes. Your "peers " have no idea about the law, and get to decide based on gut feeling if someone is guilty or not ..SMH...

 

[SpartanWarrior77]

The real problem is that the US still relies on yet another 1700 law instead of upgrading towards a more modern way of operating

Jury of your peers is fun and games untill you get send to prison for decades by some soccer moms who have no idea about the law ( and neither should they).

A modern first world country should want people ij charge who rigorously studied law and operate from a logical point of view. In that case this wouldn't be a thing, or the woman could be punished for false accusations.

Now everything goes. Your "peers " have no idea about the law, and get to decide based on gut feeling if someone is guilty or not ..SMH...

Yeah that's pretty scary.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

That's why it pays to have friends from the hood that owe you favors from back in the days when you were growing up ...to handle people like that and keep clean.