Communication - Over reading or testing behavior?

[lp12468]

Hi, I wanted to get all of your thoughts on decoding communication. Am I correct to say that women, especially if from a broken background (e.g. daddy issues), test constantly? Recently I have pulled back in the relationship and the tests have gone up 10X. They are also surrounding infidelity themes but indirectly (e.g. talking about a story where frat guys gang banged a girl and then later describing her apartment like a frathouse (one of her female friends said who is married), or talking about a sex swing randomly after very indirect jabs at poly sex with taken men and their partners). I also found it odd how her new friend's husband was renovating his home and then talked about copper, she has a copper IUD. Prior to that and through that conversation he had her finger near her lips looking at him. There are not supporting behaviors or actions, just words I must say. Should I be getting at something here? Are words ever a reliable means (indirectly of course) of whether or not someone is cheating? Donovan Sharpe has ******** (blurring out but woman ease) which does cross into the lines of decoding communication, but my interpretation was it had to do with communication tied to action (e.g. oh I just saw my coworker again). I'm also not sure how much Rollo would agree with woman ease like that.

 

[lp12468]

I always try to use Rollo's framework as there is a lot of other nonsense out there. I feel that if you go off the deep end with some forms of red pill ideology you're constantly over analyzing and paranoid, like myself. I just want to make sure whether I'm off base with that or not (e.g. she is just testing).

 

[KevinRyman22]

Women experience vast abundance, aka they dont need any new guys attention--ever. Thery can simply go on instagram DMs, fb dms, tinder and pick and choose who they want like a wealthy man looking at a watch collection in his closet.

When they test you or you are getting tested often 1) they are showing they dont care 2) they thnk you're a player and want to see u work for it ... IN either case, its not worth it.. especially if youi have to go to a forum and ask-- it just means its not for you brother.. Focus on wealth and hobbies.

 

[lp12468]

Interesting, so by showing they don't care can you explain more?

 

[lp12468]

Also I'd like to clarify this is in the context of an LTR.

 

[KevinRyman22]

I want you to understand this piece of information and plaster it on your forehead so you dont forget:
NEVER IGNORE RED FLAGS IN WOMEN. YOu are a fool to and it shows you have no boundaries if you choose to be with a woman with terrible red flags.

The woman you mentioned sounds like shes been emotionally damaged and lost all her innnocence a long time ago.. now shes a nympho and sex addict. possibly also has had SA in her past (sexual assault)..t hese women become demons.. just run bro.

 

[lp12468]

Yes but how engrained is this with Rollo Tomassi's theory? He mentions how the medium is the message, in other words what she does versus what she says. Isn't there a good chance that she is extremely toxic and testing? I am just trying to understand for future reference.

 

[lp12468]

I am familiar with the ideology but not the practice.

 

[retardedautist2020]

Also I'd like to clarify this is in the context of an LTR.

Run for the hills bro. Trust your gut, ignore Rollo the boomer who married a 35 year old and decided to write “red pill” books to cope with the fact that he married a wh0re.