"So, What Do You Do for Fun?"

She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.

Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.

The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.

Read more...

Babies being born out of robotic tubes

Travel memoir21

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Messages
2,026
Reaction score
1,155
Age
40
Location
Rio Grande Valley, Texas
Wow, this is totally trippy and if you’re religious, you’d have to question it.

Apparently, Elon Musk and his posse had been doing it for years. In my opinion, it goes back further than that and now only because due to the moral decay of society, they chose to reveal it.


What do you guys think? Is this morally right or wrong?





IMG_8121.png
 

"I'm Not Looking for Anything Serious Right Now"

When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.

Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.

Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.

The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.

Read more...

Pandora

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 11, 2008
Messages
3,729
Reaction score
3,565
Age
41
Wow, this is totally trippy and if you’re religious, you’d have to question it.

Apparently, Elon Musk and his posse had been doing it for years. In my opinion, it goes back further than that and now only because due to the moral decay of society, they chose to reveal it.


What do you guys think? Is this morally right or wrong?





View attachment 13322
If this technology is actually viable then women will be obsolete soon after. Only prostitutes will be valuable. I dont think this tech will be viable anytime soon though. I could be wrong.
 

MatureDJ

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
12,738
Reaction score
5,156
This is called an artificial womb - and it brings up some amazing philosophical questions. Will a significant portion of women decide to dispense with gestation (i.e., have test-tube babies that are gestated in this artificial womb)? And if the adjacent technology of being able to sever an embryo/fetus from a uterus is developed, might be see the abortion question be resolved with, "OK, you don't have to continue to gestate this baby to term, but if you decide to not do so, then the state will consider the baby to be an orphan"? And in that situation, will the political coalition that is against abortion AND welfare have the wherewithal to raise taxes just to pay for the resultant orphan neonatal-artificial-womb centers?
 
Top