Hello Friend,

If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.

It will be the most efficient use of your time.

And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.

Thank you for visiting and have a great day!

BRACE YOURSELF - invasion on November, 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,036
Reaction score
3,447
Highway to Heaven is being removed from Netflix on Nov 1st. I am at the last two episodes of season 1. Not sure about binging the other 4 remaining seasons before it is removed. It was one of the best pure type of tv show on. But these types of shows usually are at the bottom of the pile compared to more exciting kodern programming. Maybe its too much 80s style but I wish I took this series more seriously.

Its like that 70s show removal. Barely got through the first season there too.
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,036
Reaction score
3,447
Just finished watching Season One of Highway to Heaven and hit the last 24th episode. It took me since January, 2019 to today to watch all 24 episodes. There is no way I'm going to binge watch another 4 seasons within one month. Hard pass.

Donald Trump is supposed to be coming out of hospital...lets see what happens.
 

Jim88

Banned
Joined
Mar 26, 2020
Messages
48
Reaction score
18
Age
27
Two words. There is a mass dream going around where people are getting this word.

I've done some searches on youtube which corroborates with my mother's dream a couple of days ago. Mom believes something very bad is going to be happening around the world and that people should repent and get serious with God very soon.

I'm going to put some links to various youtube videos that corroborate people's "dream" testimony to see if we can get a resolution of a certain "mass dream" that's going on that points to something happening in the world before the end of this year which is worst than covid19, and the protests which have just happened.

In a nutshell, based on my research there are three events. One lady described them as waves. The first two waves are a warning shot (i.e. covid19 and the BLM riots), however, a third one is coming which is worst than these two:


I watched this video just after my mom had her dream to see if there was a confirmation. Here there are three waves, but the third one is the most devastating.

I'm going to include another video I saw today:


The term "BRACE YOURSELF' was first introduced by this video.

He recommended doing a search term of BRACE YOURSELF on youtube and this is what I found:



There is at least one video from that selection of videos that mentions November 2020 on the title of this. I haven't heard the contents of the video so I can't judge. I was pointed to this website where another pastor has a dream. It's not waves, but its a calendar which stops at March and June. (i.e the Covid thing was March, the riots were June).

Again, this is a "breaking news" type of thread, and I've only heard some of the videos. However, why would people put up testimonies on youtube of their dreams and the dreams have some similarities (i.e. there are 3 things, 2 things are minor and the last one is where the bad one is -- and the 2 things may have already passed). This is the most convincing aspect of this with me.

I will continue doing research with this and try to put a composite picture together, as I'm doing now with anyone who is posting their dreams/visions on youtube over the past little while. If anyone else has any dreams, visions about the end coming before this year is up, then feel free to post below (or make your own youtube video and link it).
THIS is retarded...
 

bat soup

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 10, 2020
Messages
4,293
Reaction score
4,811
Age
44
If there is really a God, can he please prove he exists by making all of the hot women´s legs open for me instead of these lame "trumpet sounds" and so on.
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,036
Reaction score
3,447
If there is really a God, can he please prove he exists by making all of the hot women´s legs open for me instead of these lame "trumpet sounds" and so on.
You would have to go to the devil for that because he deals with lust not God. There is enough proof the devil because of all the evil and chaos that is in the world caused by lust whether greed, sexual or hatred and sadism. There are events in nature too.

To see God your heart must be pure, not into lust. You must move away from the devil's infuence and the world and see it for what it is which is a vast and empty wilderness. Too much noise from the world is blinding and deafening.
 

zekko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
15,859
Reaction score
8,562
You would have to go to the devil for that because he deals with lust not God.
What is lust, do you think? The dictionary simply lists it as strong sexual desire, but I think it's more like sexual desire without taking into account the target as a person. Wanting to use someone for your own sexual pleasure without regard to them or their feelings.

Lust is also not necessarily sexual. You can lust after material things.
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,036
Reaction score
3,447
What is lust, do you think? The dictionary simply lists it as strong sexual desire, but I think it's more like sexual desire without taking into account the target as a person. Wanting to use someone for your own sexual pleasure without regard to them or their feelings.

Lust is also not necessarily sexual. You can lust after material things.
The Bible defines lust in terms of desiring the world, and what it has to offer you to gratify yourself, outside the boundaries of God's commandments, in a nutshell. It says to love not the world, nor the things that are in the world, that if anyone loves the world, then the love of the Father is not in him. (1 John 2:15-17). I would suggest to do a google search into it to contrast the world vs Jesus to go into more detail. Some sects would interpret even watching movies as "lust", especially those with actual "lustful content" in them.

It is too myopic to just define lust in terms of sexual pleasure. However, the other poster, @bat soup soup, did, on the face of his post, describe exactly what YOU would define as lust. His idea is so way off base that I had to reply and I think most people understand that what he wrote is irrational to any religious standard that is out there.

My experience is that lust impairs my passion to God and makes me more of a lukewarm Christian. I've been warned by God not to rent movies (which I really do sparingly now and am trying to purchase or borrow them instead if renting is wrong because renting FORCES you to watch a movie within a specified time, but if its purchased you can park it and like not ever watch it), and I feel indirectly not to lust after escort pics because its making me more of a lukewarm Christian, whether I like that fact or not. So, yeah, lust is sort of a problem with me in this regard.
 
Last edited:

SW15

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
12,065
Reaction score
10,348
Some people struggle with religion due to the fact that non-marital sex is banned in certain religions.
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,036
Reaction score
3,447
Some people struggle with religion due to the fact that non-marital sex is banned in certain religions.
That's a chad problem. But for the rest of us, marriage is more of a security that most guys get a woman to build a family with. Most people on here are against what feminism has wrecked upon society and how unequal the playing field is. So, its actually a good thing unless you are a chad/chad-lite, which is in the minority in society. So on that basis, maybe very few people struggle with that.

If anything it's the ultimate blackpill. Even if you win at the end of the day (ie. build yourself up to get plates, etc..) you'll lose your soul and ultimately lose. It's like the Cube Zero (2004) movie when someone who gets out of the Cube ends up getting incinerated because they lost their faith in God.
 

zekko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
15,859
Reaction score
8,562
My experience is that lust impairs my passion to God and makes me more of a lukewarm Christian. I've been warned by God not to rent movies (which I really do sparingly now and am trying to purchase or borrow them instead if renting is wrong because renting FORCES you to watch a movie within a specified time
My main objection to fapping, and more especially porn, is that it is a waste of time. Our time here is limited, and one of my biggest struggles is to be as productive as I'd like to be. I always feel better and more positive when I am productive, and that can relate to being a good Christian in my view.

I don't care for buying films anymore, I used to. As I said before, if you want to watch Force Majeure it's free right now on Tubi. Tubi is also where I watched Whiplash this last time. Tubi is great because not only is it free, you don't even have to sign up or register for it, you just go to their site and watch it. I also have an app on my TV where I can watch it. They have a lot of movies, not the best selection honestly, but they have the occasional gem.
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,036
Reaction score
3,447
My main objection to fapping, and more especially porn, is that it is a waste of time. Our time here is limited, and one of my biggest struggles is to be as productive as I'd like to be. I always feel better and more positive when I am productive, and that can relate to being a good Christian in my view.
Watching movies could be argued to be a waste of time too. If that is your only objection then its a rather weak one for me to get especially if this is done during downtime or while you are in bed (if you cant sleep or wake up too early then you cant control that). Again it depends on when and to what extent based on your argument. Otherwise you cant have fun and have to do everything because you have to do them. The point of fun is its not productive in any objective way and its.productivity, if any, is entirely subjective. What may be a waste of time to someone may he a good time or well.needed break to another.

The biblical argument is that it is an aspect of darkness that takes focus away from just looking to Jesus. This is apart from the objective fact the content is an abomination to God in and of itself even though the intent of heart of the viewer is more layered or nuanced. If God sees the heart then what is done in mind is the same to God then if it is actually done. So its is not just a waste of time but an actual sin in the heart of fornication is being committed undermining everything. Looking at escort pics vs actually visiting an escort is almost the same thing and that to me is the only reason its wrong.

Suppose trajedy happens in life and I lose my head to act our of character. Then what is to stop me from actually visiting an escort again if I keep planting seeds of visiting escorts in the mind? This is why looking at escort pics to fantasize about visiting one is always just plain wrong.

zekkp said:
I don't care for buying films anymore, I used to. As I said before, if you want to watch Force Majeure it's free right now on Tubi. Tubi is also where I watched Whiplash this last time. Tubi is great because not only is it free, you don't even have to sign up or register for it, you just go to their site and watch it. I also have an app on my TV where I can watch it. They have a lot of movies, not the best selection honestly, but they have the occasional gem.
Its probably American only. Again I like to choose content and dont like watching movies because its a movie and thst requires access to a larger selection so I need only watch gems with my time. Like you I too believe time important.
 

SW15

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
12,065
Reaction score
10,348
Some people struggle with religion due to the fact that non-marital sex is banned in certain religions.
That's a chad problem. But for the rest of us, marriage is more of a security that most guys get a woman to build a family with. Most people on here are against what feminism has wrecked upon society and how unequal the playing field is. So, its actually a good thing unless you are a chad/chad-lite, which is in the minority in society. So on that basis, maybe very few people struggle with that.

If anything it's the ultimate blackpill. Even if you win at the end of the day (ie. build yourself up to get plates, etc..) you'll lose your soul and ultimately lose. It's like the Cube Zero (2004) movie when someone who gets out of the Cube ends up getting incinerated because they lost their faith in God.
I don't think this is a Chad/Chad-Lite problem. BTW, I dislike using those terms. Let's say the upper 20% of men.

The upper 10% of men are getting a good amount of sex. They receive physical satiation from the quantity of sex that they are receiving. The next 10% of men are doing reasonably as well.

After the top 20% of men, there are plenty of men not receiving a sufficient quantity of sex. Some of these men are unattached betas. Some are married men. There are plenty of married men in sexless relationships.

My hypothesis is that there are a lot of men who are not Top 20% men not getting sufficient sex who want to be getting sufficient sex who are not in marital relationships and are not attracted to religion interfering with their sex lives. I base this on 3 data points.

1. Increase in sexlessness among males, especially 18-29 males.
2. Decrease in weekly church attendance across Judeo-Christian faiths
3. Decrease in marriage within the Millennial generation (1981-1996)
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,036
Reaction score
3,447
I don't think this is a Chad/Chad-Lite problem. BTW, I dislike using those terms. Let's say the upper 20% of men.

The upper 10% of men are getting a good amount of sex. They receive physical satiation from the quantity of sex that they are receiving. The next 10% of men are doing reasonably as well.

After the top 20% of men, there are plenty of men not receiving a sufficient quantity of sex. Some of these men are unattached betas. Some are married men. There are plenty of married men in sexless relationships.

My hypothesis is that there are a lot of men who are not Top 20% men not getting sufficient sex who want to be getting sufficient sex who are not in marital relationships and are not attracted to religion interfering with their sex lives. I base this on 3 data points.

1. Increase in sexlessness among males, especially 18-29 males.
2. Decrease in weekly church attendance across Judeo-Christian faiths
3. Decrease in marriage within the Millennial generation (1981-1996)
So in the 1950s, most married men were sexless? The question is if guys were better off in the 50s in terms of societal norms in that more guys were accounted for compared to today when there is a larger amount of guys shut out? Why would people look back and think certain aspects of society were better off in the past? Do you agree with this or think we are better off today? It feels like men knew their place, women knew their place and it worked. Was society more religious and less secular back then? Was it part of leftist communist countries goal to undermine the US by the moral collapse of their soceity so they can take it over? Those are more focused question than the three statistics that can mean anything? Allot of yonge people may stop attending church because they are disgusted by how the white evangelical church supported Trump not because of the reasons you suggested.
 

SW15

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
12,065
Reaction score
10,348
So in the 1950s, most married men were sexless? The question is if guys were better off in the 50s in terms of societal norms in that more guys were accounted for compared to today when there is a larger amount of guys shut out? Why would people look back and think certain aspects of society were better off in the past? Do you agree with this or think we are better off today? It feels like men knew their place, women knew their place and it worked. Was society more religious and less secular back then? Was it part of leftist communist countries goal to undermine the US by the moral collapse of their soceity so they can take it over? Those are more focused question than the three statistics that can mean anything? Allot of yonge people may stop attending church because they are disgusted by how the white evangelical church supported Trump not because of the reasons you suggested.
The sexless marriage seems to be a more recent phenomenon.

I would say that the typical guy was better off in the 1950s-1960s than 1990-present.

There was more practice of religion in the 1950s-1960s than today.

I think more people are concerned with getting laid than politics. Catholic doctrine is clear on no sex before marriage. Various other Christian faiths have that doctrine. When people are getting married at 18-20, as was common before 1970, it is feasible to follow that doctrine. It gets way more difficult to follow that as a 25 or 35 year old.

A lot of guys are chasing the dream of being able to have a lot of sex with hot women, either in a serial monogamy sense (changing out girlfriends every 1-5 years) or as a player with a constant rotation of them. A lot of men outside the Top 20% are falling short on that, especially when that goal is combined with rampant female hypergamy due to endless options. A lack of control over lust and a lack of sex is causing societal problems such as simping, porn addiction, OnlyFans, thirst, etc.
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,036
Reaction score
3,447
The sexless marriage seems to be a more recent phenomenon.

I would say that the typical guy was better off in the 1950s-1960s than 1990-present.

There was more practice of religion in the 1950s-1960s than today.
So, more religion in society means more sex, not less sex. Even you can get that. If more women are having sex, but with 20% of the guys, then as a net that means less people as a whole are having sex numerically.

SW15 said:
I think more people are concerned with getting laid than politics. Catholic doctrine is clear on no sex before marriage. Various other Christian faiths have that doctrine. When people are getting married at 18-20, as was common before 1970, it is feasible to follow that doctrine. It gets way more difficult to follow that as a 25 or 35 year old.
If guys are sexless between 18-29 years old, and are sexless beyond that, then what point are you even trying to make? It still sounds better off with that doctrine because most guys are eventually going to get consistent sex, as opposed to being completely shut out.

SW15 said:
A lot of guys are chasing the dream of being able to have a lot of sex with hot women, either in a serial monogamy sense (changing out girlfriends every 1-5 years) or as a player with a constant rotation of them. A lot of men outside the Top 20% are falling short on that, especially when that goal is combined with rampant female hypergamy due to endless options. A lack of control over lust and a lack of sex is causing societal problems such as simping, porn addiction, OnlyFans, thirst, etc.
We are not talking about those types of guys in this thread. We are talking about the 80%. You sound like you are agreeing with me that more religious society seems that more guys had access to sex. You can't blame lack of control over lust for societal problems if there is no outlet period except for the artificial outlets you put there, you can only really blame lack of sex. Lack of sex is caused by extreme female hypergamy where a large percentage of guys are simply left out. If there is no outlet to have sex then a religious society where everyone gets married unless they choose to remain celibate for religious reasons sounds way better than today.

Unless you are in the top 20% of guys, nobody is signing up for this and would not struggle with religion because of a doctrine that guarantees they will get laid as opposed to being thirsty, simping, porn addiciton, or whatever else you want to add to the list. You just have to read @MatureDJ to see how terrible things are today for most guys and how badly we are worst off without religion in society on the level of guys getting (matrimonially) laid.
 
Last edited:

SW15

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
12,065
Reaction score
10,348
So, more religion in society means more sex, not less sex. Even you can get that. If more women are having sex, but with 20% of the guys, then as a net that means less people as a whole are having sex numerically.

If guys are sexless between 18-29 years old, and are sexless beyond that, then what point are you even trying to make? It still sounds better off with that doctrine because most guys are eventually going to get consistent sex, as opposed to being completely shut out.

We are not talking about those types of guys in this thread. We are talking about the 80%. You sound like you are agreeing with me that more religious society seems that more guys had access to sex. You can't blame lack of control over lust for societal problems if there is no outlet period except for the artificial outlets you put there, you can only really blame lack of sex. Lack of sex is caused by extreme female hypergamy where a large percentage of guys are simply left out. If there is no outlet to have sex then a religious society where everyone gets married unless they choose to remain celibate for religious reasons sounds way better than today.

Unless you are in the top 20% of guys, nobody is signing up for this and would not struggle with religion because of a doctrine that guarantees they will get laid as opposed to being thirsty, simping, porn addiciton, or whatever else you want to add to the list. You just have to read @MatureDJ to see how terrible things are today for most guys and how badly we are worst off without religion in society on the level of guys getting (matrimonially) laid.
We agree on the idea that the 50th percentile man has been worse off in the 21st Century than he was many decades ago. We agree that bottom 80% of men are worse off now.

People as a whole are having less sex. The Sex Recession in The Atlantic from 2018 is a commonly cited article about that.

Where we disagree is the reaction to changes in the landscape.

In 1965, the 50th percentile guy was some married guy having sex with his normal weight wife about twice a week and having 2-3 children while practicing some Judeo-Christian religion by attending a Saturday or Sunday service weekly.

In the past decade, the 50th percentile guy is probably some late Gen X'er (1976-1980) or early Millennial (1981-1986). There is a good chance that he is either divorced or never married. If he's a Millennial, he's likely never married. There's a decent chance he doesn't have kids. If by some chance he's married, he was married civilly, and not in a church, and his marriage has less sex in it than a few decades ago.

The 50th percentile guy of 2010-today does at least one of the following things.

-Is a sexual scavenger, primarily operating on swipe apps. He's swiping and texting like a maniac. He's having a lot of first dates that don't result in sex or a 2nd date. When he succeeds, he's often having sex with an overweight woman, who might also be a single mom. So he's having less frequent sex and with a lower quality woman.
-Frequently watches content from pornno tube sites, and furiously masturbates to them.
-Orbits attractive women on Instagram and simps for women on OnlyFans
-Has to find ways to cope with long sexual droughts

The 50th percentile guy is thinking more about the next time he is going to get laid as compared to practicing a religion and adhering to its strict doctrine.
 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,036
Reaction score
3,447
Where we disagree is the reaction to changes in the landscape.

In 1965, the 50th percentile guy was some married guy having sex with his normal weight wife about twice a week and having 2-3 children while practicing some Judeo-Christian religion by attending a Saturday or Sunday service weekly.

In the past decade, the 50th percentile guy is probably some late Gen X'er (1976-1980) or early Millennial (1981-1986). There is a good chance that he is either divorced or never married. If he's a Millennial, he's likely never married. There's a decent chance he doesn't have kids. If by some chance he's married, he was married civilly, and not in a church, and his marriage has less sex in it than a few decades ago.

The 50th percentile guy of 2010-today does at least one of the following things.

-Is a sexual scavenger, primarily operating on swipe apps. He's swiping and texting like a maniac. He's having a lot of first dates that don't result in sex or a 2nd date. When he succeeds, he's often having sex with an overweight woman, who might also be a single mom. So he's having less frequent sex and with a lower quality woman.
-Frequently watches content from pornno tube sites, and furiously masturbates to them.
-Orbits attractive women on Instagram and simps for women on OnlyFans
-Has to find ways to cope with long sexual droughts

The 50th percentile guy is thinking more about the next time he is going to get laid as compared to practicing a religion and adhering to its strict doctrine.
The focus of discussion was religion and the culture within society as a whole when religion was a more dominant force. Churches do not care or cater for single guys or incel guys unless you are a chad or something and running church game. For it to work, the whole society outside the church has subscribe to it or a woman can just pair up with anyone outside the church. You think their options are just limited to that church? Lots of women flip their smartphones on while service is going on or just before it ends and probably have gigantic virtual social bubbles.

The 50th percentile guy is in a society where the lack of religion within it has condemned him to live a substandard life. For the record, there aren't that many strong churches out there. Allot of them are lukewarm and weak or are getting political and focusing on Trump and it throws allot of people off. I think, at least in my past, church offered a venue to at least talk to women. I can't even see that today and even my mother has lost interest in evening encouraging me to go to church because its just hopeless in that department as well. Lets see what happens next month...whatever it is, can't be worst than this sh1tty state of affairs.
 
Last edited:

Bible_Belt

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
17,021
Reaction score
5,605
Age
48
Location
midwestern cow field 40
For the record, there aren't that many strong churches out there.
I blame the rise of the mega churches. They are one big sales pitch to make themselves money. The key is to only tell people happy, feel good stuff and never challenge any of their decision making or present them with any sort of intellectual or moral difficulty from faith. None of these people actually read the bible, so they will believe anything about what it says. A friend of mine went to a local mega church. The pastor said in the sermon that the most common word spoken by jesus was "money" and that jesus said to give money to the church, because that is how one gets to heaven.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top