White liberal protesting. It is a cucked fantasy?

[Medina]

I drove down to the protests in my hometown here in Britain yesterday to observe

I'm not gonna make any comment on the movement itself. I can understand there are good arguments

But what no one has pointed out is that a good majority of these protests are white middle class women

Before you jump the gun and say they want the BBC, this is not the case. These girls are nearly always dating white guys

But it's interesting the kind of language they use. "Silence is violence" - you could look a little deeper into that, as we all know, attention is currency for women

But what really amazes me is the men. Is it some kind of cucked fantasy? Why are they so willing to get to their knees? Just think about how submissive of an act that is

I sat there and watched them, spew out a kind of twisted self-hatred for their OWN kind. They denounced THEMSELVES over and over again... and seemed to really enjoy it

While the anti-protestors on the other side were extemEly masculine looking

What we have is women/left wing guys vs white conservative men. That's the real war here. The real message was lost long ago and the minorities are kinda used like pawns

Malcolm X realized this too. He did not trust the white liberal male

So what is their deal?

 

[Who Dares Win]

It all grows out of envy for the lacking masculinity, either penis envy in women or manliness envy in those men.

Not that we needed further proof to know that soyboys have something wrong in them, awfully not all men can survive being grown from women since their early life, lacking father figures and male role models.

They realize that there is something wrong in them and think that the same is for any man and anything man related.

A socialist (not only in terms of economy) mindset is basically the opposite of a sane man view which is why is no surprise women love it, the problem is many men do it too.

 

[Epicenter]

They might be just progressives. To want to live in a peaceful society without male dominance and posturing is not in itself a bad thing. If it is reasonable under the current context is very much arguable but that is a different story.

 

[Spaz]

For me there are 2 types of world that coexist at the same time.

1 is the feminine world, a make believe world that a vast majority of humanity lives in.

The other where I thrive and basically huff, and puff, and blows anyone away is the world where men and beast live in.

The rules are different in these 2 worlds but it's the world of men and beast that governs the majority, silently.

Everything else is just noise.

Think carefully, in which world do you live in now and then you'll have ur answer.

 

[Epicenter]

For me there are 2 types of world that coexist at the same time.

1 is the feminine world, a make believe world that a vast majority of humanity lives in.

The other where I thrive and basically huff, and puff, and blows anyone away is the world where men and beast live in.

The rules are different in these 2 worlds but it's the world of men and beast that governs the majority, silently.

Everything else is just noise.

Think carefully, in which world do you live in now and then you'll have ur answer.

I believe they are two extremes and reality is inbetween. I believe everybody has feminine and masculine elements. Depending on the environment it gets triggered.

If let's say you are stranded on an island and have to live on your own I think you have to develop your feminine side (whatever it means) as well. To be a more of a wholesome person.

When men become too masculine they become heroes or villains or a caricature who ends up being a brutal criminal in a prison.

Like with all things in life it's about finding balance.

 

[Spaz]

I believe they are two extremes and reality is inbetween. I believe everybody has feminine and masculine elements. Depending on the environment it gets triggered.

If let's say you are stranded on an island and have to live on your own I think you have to develop your feminine side (whatever it means) as well. To be a more of a wholesome person.

When men become too masculine they become heroes or villains or a caricature who ends up being a brutal criminal in a prison.

Like with all things in life it's about finding balance.

Balance is only available when there are 2 opposing force.

Feminine tendencies is an inborn trait for females.

Whereas masculinity is a learned trait for men - it must be taught by a "village of men".

A man is not a man until he is acknowledged by a man of higher standing.

When there is a lack of masculinity within a certain society, the females of that society will automatically assume some masculine traits to balance it out, does that make sense? You can actually see it happening in some societies.

But then, masculinity was never meant for women and they become miserable, unhappy because of it.

Women are the happiest when they fully embrace and use their femininity, therein lies their true power. A power that actually is equal to masculinity.

That's balance.

Now there's no such thing as a natural feminine side in a man simply because there is no such thing as a unisex brain.

 

[Lynx nkaf]

Agree to what you wrote.
You're nice(gratuitous) to say femininity can be as powerful as masculinity. Thanks.

 

[Epicenter]

Balance is only available when there are 2 opposing force.

Feminine tendencies is an inborn trait for females.

Whereas masculinity is a learned trait for men - it must be taught by a "village of men".

A man is not a man until he is acknowledged by a man of higher standing.

When there is a lack of masculinity within a certain society, the females of that society will automatically assume some masculine traits to balance it out, does that make sense? You can actually see it happening in some societies.

But then, masculinity was never meant for women and they become miserable, unhappy because of it.

Women are the happiest when they fully embrace and use their femininity, therein lies their true power. A power that actually is equal to masculinity.

That's balance.

Now there's no such thing as a natural feminine side in a man simply because there is no such thing as a unisex brain.

I know this theory and in general I do agree but it does not show the big picture.

I like the idea of a renaissance men. A men who is developed in a wholesome way. Think about philosopers back in the time. All of them went to the military. They could do all the necessary thing plus philosophy and arts.

I don't necessarily believe that man are simply cave men (hyperbole).

What I mean with feminine is things like art, literature, psychology, singing, dancing. They are programming languages of our brain. Religion is build on stories. These stories program our brain.

Additionally art is a indirect mating tool for men to show women their fitness like a bird that sings and dances.

In nature it is not unusual that the male is more colorful then the female. For example I think pink was traditionally a male color.

There are times like war where the ultra warrior is needed. In peaceful times the women want more the colorful entertainer little bit more. Things fluctuate I guess.

 

[RangerMIke]

I don't worry about any of this because there is nothing I can do about it. Complaining about liberalism, like arguing with a woman, is pointless. Directly confronting this is pointless. Chose wisely the battles you fight... you do not want to expend political capital on things that, in the greater scheme of things, are irrelevant. Let them march and b1tch about silly things... stay focused on what is important.

However, what is dangerous, in the interest of opposition, if we continue to oppose everything... even sh1t that does not really matter, just because a liberal wants it. We can not allow ourselves to get sucked into stupidity. Case in post, the removal of Confederate monuments and military bases named after Confederate Generals... none of that sh1t really matters. So what if Confederate statues are taken down... what does it matter? So what if we change the names of Army bases... why does this matter?

Let liberals and progressives be what they are, because they ALWAYS go too far, and ALWAYS get snapped back Case in point, the city of Seattle established a police free zone... the city let them do this and predictably, that part of the city has descended into chaos. Here in New Orleans, we took down CSA monuments a couple of years ago... the city moved on... no problem... now these same people are vandalizing statues of a man that used his personal wealth building the public school system... and they want to take down the statue of Andrew Jackson... they always go too far... and they always get pushed back. I do not believe there is such a thing as a 'slippery slope' there are NUMEROUS examples of a society going too far and when that happens, we ALWAYS correct course.

As far as white chicks involved in these protests.... well... much of that is just women going along with the herd and virtual signaling. Completely normal chick behavior, so none of that is a surprise. For me... you won't see me wasting time protesting police violence... although I think it is a problem that should be addressed... and you will not see me doing any count-protests either since I'm too fvcking busy... while other b1tch about sh1t, I accept reality for what it is and examine how I can take advantage of this. Rather than b1tching about the Covid-19 quarantine... I started designing custom Plexiglas screens, worked on importing respirators, and other PII.

 

[SW15]

Women tend to have more liberal ideologies than men.

There are liberal white men out there. I would say that the majority of white men are not protesting.

If a white man is protesting, I think he would fall into one of 2 categories..
1. Extreme liberal, possibly a cuck
2. A guy who really doesn't care about the politics, realizes there is a crowd, and is looking to pick up women. This group is much smaller than 1.

There has been news that testosterone levels have been down in recent decades, meaning more cucks. A lot of the "toxic masculinity" narrative is aimed at emasculating white men.

 

[Epicenter]

Women tend to have more liberal ideologies than men.

There are liberal white men out there. I would say that the majority of white men are not protesting.

If a white man is protesting, I think he would fall into one of 2 categories..
1. Extreme liberal, possibly a cuck
2. A guy who really doesn't care about the politics, realizes there is a crowd, and is looking to pick up women. This group is much smaller than 1.

There has been news that testosterone levels have been down in recent decades, meaning more cucks. A lot of the "toxic masculinity" narrative is aimed at emasculating white men.

I guess the group 2 is bigger. Chances are they will become the leaders because they are oppurtunists.

 

[SW15]

Chances are they will become the leaders because they are oppurtunists.

Over the last 3 weeks, the protests have offered one of the best opportunities in terms of quantity for pickup. I wonder how many guys were going to the protests because they knew women would be there.

 

[Spaz]

I don't worry about any of this because there is nothing I can do about it. Complaining about liberalism, like arguing with a woman, is pointless. Directly confronting this is pointless. Chose wisely the battles you fight... you do not want to expend political capital on things that, in the greater scheme of things, are irrelevant. Let them march and b1tch about silly things... stay focused on what is important.

However, what is dangerous, in the interest of opposition, if we continue to oppose everything... even sh1t that does not really matter, just because a liberal wants it. We can not allow ourselves to get sucked into stupidity. Case in post, the removal of Confederate monuments and military bases named after Confederate Generals... none of that sh1t really matters. So what if Confederate statues are taken down... what does it matter? So what if we change the names of Army bases... why does this matter?

Let liberals and progressives be what they are, because they ALWAYS go too far, and ALWAYS get snapped back Case in point, the city of Seattle established a police free zone... the city let them do this and predictably, that part of the city has descended into chaos. Here in New Orleans, we took down CSA monuments a couple of years ago... the city moved on... no problem... now these same people are vandalizing statues of a man that used his personal wealth building the public school system... and they want to take down the statue of Andrew Jackson... they always go too far... and they always get pushed back. I do not believe there is such a thing as a 'slippery slope' there are NUMEROUS examples of a society going too far and when that happens, we ALWAYS correct course.

As far as white chicks involved in these protests.... well... much of that is just women going along with the herd and virtual signaling. Completely normal chick behavior, so none of that is a surprise. For me... you won't see me wasting time protesting police violence... although I think it is a problem that should be addressed... and you will not see me doing any count-protests either since I'm too fvcking busy... while other b1tch about sh1t, I accept reality for what it is and examine how I can take advantage of this. Rather than b1tching about the Covid-19 quarantine... I started designing custom Plexiglas screens, worked on importing respirators, and other PII.

A wise decision.

 

[Xenom0rph]

With women, I believe the frenzy, pandemonium, chaos, and excitement of a protest feeds their desire for an emotional rollercoaster..... women feed off of emotions, drama and excitement. Also add to the equation that most people are bored out of their minds because of lockdown....so the protests give them an excuse to go out and cause a ruckus for some excitement.

Let's be realistic about 1 thing: these middle-class suburban White women don't truly care about the cause, they're just tourists along for the ride......

This why when Eric Garner or Philando Castile or any other Black man were killed by cops the protests weren't quite as massive as they are now - because there weren't any lockdowns in those years.

As for the White men:

A) They're bored and looking for an excuse to cause a ruckus
B) They see a bunch of women and naively believe that these women truly support they cause, so they pretend to support the cause as well in hopes of getting some pvssy
C) They actually do care about the cause - sadly these guys are the extreme minority, very few White guys in these protests are there because of altruistic reasons.....

 

[SW15]

that most people are bored out of their minds because of lockdown...

It's not just boredom. How about unemployment? Unemployment right now is higher than it was in 2008-2010 or at any point since the 1930s. People are steaming mad over the unemployment.

 

[Xenom0rph]

It's not just boredom. How about unemployment? Unemployment right now is higher than it was in 2008-2010 or at any point since the 1930s. People are steaming mad over the unemployment.

True indeed. We have 40M people unemployed in the US right now...... That's 40M p1ssed off people looking for an excuse to cause chaos.....

.....lockdown was the worst way to respond to this scamdemic......

 

[Hal9000]

Women are followers which is why the left has done everything in its power to destroy the modern family. Instead of following their nonliberal husbands they are now following whatever their social media feed tells them to. The fact all of this is inherently bad for them will never even cross most of of their minds.

 

[SW15]

white middle class women
So what is their deal?

What is their deal? White middle class women often have a charmed existence. Some may be unemployed right now. In white collar, there are more unemployed men, so it's not that. The women more affected by unemployment have been low wage service sector women.

 

[Xenom0rph]

Accountability.

Be careful with that word, my man...... the word "accountability" triggers people these days......

 

[Kotaix]

But it's interesting the kind of language they use. "Silence is violence" - you could look a little deeper into that, as we all know, attention is currency for women

But what really amazes me is the men. Is it some kind of cucked fantasy? Why are they so willing to get to their knees? Just think about how submissive of an act that is

I sat there and watched them, spew out a kind of twisted self-hatred for their OWN kind. They denounced THEMSELVES over and over again... and seemed to really enjoy it

While the anti-protestors on the other side were extemEly masculine looking

What we have is women/left wing guys vs white conservative men. That's the real war here. The real message was lost long ago and the minorities are kinda used like pawns

You can no longer divorce the behavior of these people from the movement itself. The SJW movement has become a cult, a non-theistic religion with it's own set of insane dogmas like 32 genders and the world is going to end in 12 years due to climate change. These people are fanatics. That's why they're acting like this, it's not about women vs men or liberal vs conservative.

All you have to do is look at them. Women with shaved heads. People sitting on the ground with their arms in the air chanting crazy talk while they wash the feet of minorities and beg forgiveness for their original sin of being born white. Extinction Rebellion wearing matching red garbs like nuns. Gaslighting and attacking anyone who dares to speak out against the narrative.

I wouldn't be surprised to see these people self-flagellating themselves in the very near future.

Why do they do it? Same reason crazy religious cults do it. They think they are being virtuous and pious. That and they have to make sure others see them as part of the group. If you say the wrong thing when you're in a cult, you get kicked out and all your friends will turn on you. This is literally happening.

Why is this happening? Nietzsche called this out 150 years ago, that the death of God would simply spawn something similar. Read Thus Spoke Zarathustra, especially the chapter called The Tarantulas. Excerpt here:


Because, FOR MAN TO BE REDEEMED FROM REVENGE—that is for me the bridge to the highest hope, and a rainbow after long storms.

Otherwise, however, would the tarantulas have it. “Let it be very justice for the world to become full of the storms of our vengeance”—thus do they talk to one another.

“Vengeance will we use, and insult, against all who are not like us”—thus do the tarantula-hearts pledge themselves.
“And ‘Will to Equality’—that itself shall henceforth be the name of virtue; and against all that hath power will we raise an outcry!”

Ye preachers of equality, the tyrant-frenzy of impotence crieth thus in you for “equality”: your most secret tyrant-longings disguise themselves thus in virtue-words!