Hello Friend,

If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.

It will be the most efficient use of your time.

And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.

Thank you for visiting and have a great day!

Women's Clothing

zekko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
15,860
Reaction score
8,564
I can't help but be amused by the differences in men and woman's clothing. Professionally, men are generally covered up completely with shirt, tie, and suit. Women show much more skin, plunging necklines, bare shoulders, spaghetti straps, short skirts, peek-a-boo holes, etc. And that's before you even get to casual wear.

They show all this extra skin despite being the gender that usually complains about being cold.

Some guys claim men are the more aesthetic sex, but I think this (among other things) shows otherwise. People aren't generally clamoring to see more male skin in day to day life.
 

wifehunter

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
5,201
Reaction score
3,328
Age
50
Location
Hoe County, California
Women claim these types of clothes are 'more comfortable'... which is code for 'I'm a hoe, and I do what I want'.
 

Xenom0rph

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 12, 2017
Messages
1,931
Reaction score
2,472
There's a gorgeous Stacy at my work that has a penchant for wearing skirts, heels and lotion that smells like apple cinnamon.

She loves to catwalk down the halls and play mind games on all the beta cvcks. It's funny that you mentioned, because she likes to wear skimpy clothes while constantly complaining to the men about how cold the building is - no doubt playing the damsel-in-distress game on all these white knight cvcks.

While I find her antics tiresome, I do admit that I've glanced at that as$ a few times while she's slvtting down the hallways - the way she swings her hips, the way she waves her hair, the way her legs glisten in office lighting - it's indeed quite s3xy.....

.....aside from that, she's as dumb as a doorknob.....
 

Rictor1

Don Juan
Joined
Dec 27, 2019
Messages
61
Reaction score
103
Age
37
I can't help but be amused by the differences in men and woman's clothing. Professionally, men are generally covered up completely with shirt, tie, and suit. Women show much more skin, plunging necklines, bare shoulders, spaghetti straps, short skirts, peek-a-boo holes, etc. And that's before you even get to casual wear.

They show all this extra skin despite being the gender that usually complains about being cold.

Some guys claim men are the more aesthetic sex, but I think this (among other things) shows otherwise. People aren't generally clamoring to see more male skin in day to day life.
I've actually gotten in trouble for "making people uncomfortable" by wearing a tanktop and shorts in the weight room at work. Anyone with more muscle mass will sweat more during physical activity, this is a pretty well known fact (higher metabolic rate). I literally did nothing wrong because within that context, the clothing was appropriate. It's not like I was wearing that while working. And yet, women walk around all the time wearing even more revealing clothing and many of them are fat and gross. Fat shaming is unacceptable but fit shaming seems to be accepted. The double standards are glaring and contemptible.

Notice also that a man can get into trouble just for "making someone uncomfortable" even if they've done absolutely nothing wrong. So apparently a woman's own insecurities have to be catered to on a professional level too. I wonder if I'd be taken seriously if I said that the things women wear make me "uncomfortable."

And it's always the unattractive, out of shape women that have a problem with me. Never the hot ones. Coincidence?
 

samspade

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 5, 2008
Messages
7,996
Reaction score
5,054
I always thought it was odd that well-dressed men look so buttoned-up (suits, tuxes) while women dress flamboyantly. In nature, you see the opposite. The male duck has a beautiful green head and wings, the female is brown. Bucks have ten point antlers. And of course peacocks have brilliant plumage while again, peahens have more muted colors. Hence PUA's took the term 'peacocking' to describe any flamboyant accent or apparel to catch attention.

As for skin, that's simple evolution...males are attracted by visuals, and I'm sure the curvaceous female form adapted in part for this reason. I don't know about you guys but I'm constantly undressing women with my eyes and I don't even do it consciously. I think women like the classic male form, too, but 1) usually they already are a little interested in the specific guy and 2) they hate overt displays.
 

AttackFormation

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 2, 2014
Messages
4,126
Reaction score
3,659
Age
31
Location
Sweden
I can't help but be amused by the differences in men and woman's clothing. Professionally, men are generally covered up completely with shirt, tie, and suit. Women show much more skin, plunging necklines, bare shoulders, spaghetti straps, short skirts, peek-a-boo holes, etc. And that's before you even get to casual wear.

They show all this extra skin despite being the gender that usually complains about being cold.

Some guys claim men are the more aesthetic sex, but I think this (among other things) shows otherwise. People aren't generally clamoring to see more male skin in day to day life.
Whether womens' cosmetics and clothing are oppressive or not and why they wear them depends on the woman in question's sentiment.

Sometimes they are oppressed into wearing them (cosmetics and revealing clothing) by the patriarchy's sexualization of women. Sometimes they're symbols of empowerment and liberation from the patriarchy's repression of womens' sexuality. Sometimes it's for their own selfesteem and the last thing on their minds is male attention, which is just an unfortunate side effect. Sometimes it's to validate themselves with male attention whether alone or in an arms race with other women (which is the reason they will least admit to). Sometimes it's for fashion competition with other women, which may or may not be part of establishing the internal pecking order in the bytch pack.

Which one it is just depends on the individual woman and how she feels at the time.

It's similar to how there is an internal split within feminism over whether porn is a symbol of the patriarchy's oppression or a symbol of womens' liberation and empowerment, and the same thing for prostitution.
 
Last edited:

Medina

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 23, 2019
Messages
866
Reaction score
1,544
Much of male fashion is the "civilized beast" thing and it turns women on

You have the potential to be a raging caveman but it's all kept under wraps in that civilized suit. James Bond is the epitome of this. It's a concealed Masculinity, hidden for everyone's sake, but there, waiting to be called upon

Society in general responds well to this. No one likes a meat head
 

Epic Days

Banned
Joined
May 7, 2019
Messages
1,884
Reaction score
1,650
Age
39
Women claim these types of clothes are 'more comfortable'... which is code for 'I'm a hoe, and I do what I want'.
HAHAHA. I love it
 

Epic Days

Banned
Joined
May 7, 2019
Messages
1,884
Reaction score
1,650
Age
39
You could always show up at the company gym wearing even more revealing women's work attire. Then, sue, when they ask you to change...er...I mean, when they challenge your sexual identity.
Do this OP
IT would be priceless.
 

Epic Days

Banned
Joined
May 7, 2019
Messages
1,884
Reaction score
1,650
Age
39
Whether womens' cosmetics and clothing are oppressive or not and why they wear them depends on the woman in question's sentiment.

Sometimes they are oppressed into wearing them (cosmetics and revealing clothing) by the patriarchy's sexualization of women. Sometimes they're symbols of empowerment and liberation from the patriarchy's repression of womens' sexuality. Sometimes it's for their own selfesteem and the last thing on their minds is male attention, which is just an unfortunate side effect. Sometimes it's to validate themselves with male attention whether alone or in an arms race with other women (which is the reason they will least admit to). Sometimes it's for fashion competition with other women, which may or may not be part of establishing the internal pecking order in the bytch pack.

Which one it is just depends on the individual woman and how she feels at the time.

It's similar to how there is an internal split within feminism over whether porn is a symbol of the patriarchy's oppression or a symbol of womens' liberation and empowerment, and the same thing for prostitution.
Oppression? Please tell me that was tongue and cheek. Lol
 

Kotaix

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 29, 2019
Messages
2,279
Reaction score
2,884
Age
46
Women will go to great lengths for attention. Don't forget about wearing super long heels to make their butts look tighter which hurt like a motherfvcker and make their feet grow bunions over time.

Much of male fashion is the "civilized beast" thing and it turns women on

You have the potential to be a raging caveman but it's all kept under wraps in that civilized suit. James Bond is the epitome of this. It's a concealed Masculinity, hidden for everyone's sake, but there, waiting to be called upon

Society in general responds well to this. No one likes a meat head
There's a lot of truth in that!
 

Atom Smasher

Master Don Juan
Joined
Sep 22, 2008
Messages
8,734
Reaction score
6,664
Age
66
Location
The 7th Dimension
Men wear armor which conveys power. This is their major attractive trait. Women wear skimpy clothing to show off their bodes. Their major attractive trait. I think it's that simple.
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
17,936
Reaction score
12,147
Location
DFW, TX
I've actually gotten in trouble for "making people uncomfortable" by wearing a tanktop and shorts in the weight room at work. Anyone with more muscle mass will sweat more during physical activity, this is a pretty well known fact (higher metabolic rate). I literally did nothing wrong because within that context, the clothing was appropriate. It's not like I was wearing that while working. And yet, women walk around all the time wearing even more revealing clothing and many of them are fat and gross. Fat shaming is unacceptable but fit shaming seems to be accepted. The double standards are glaring and contemptible.

Notice also that a man can get into trouble just for "making someone uncomfortable" even if they've done absolutely nothing wrong. So apparently a woman's own insecurities have to be catered to on a professional level too. I wonder if I'd be taken seriously if I said that the things women wear make me "uncomfortable."

And it's always the unattractive, out of shape women that have a problem with me. Never the hot ones. Coincidence?
To take you down a few pegs. Your probably focused and confident.
 

MatureDJ

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
10,454
Reaction score
4,315
I can't help but be amused by the differences in men and woman's clothing. Professionally, men are generally covered up completely with shirt, tie, and suit. Women show much more skin, plunging necklines, bare shoulders, spaghetti straps, short skirts, peek-a-boo holes, etc. And that's before you even get to casual wear.

They show all this extra skin despite being the gender that usually complains about being cold.

Some guys claim men are the more aesthetic sex, but I think this (among other things) shows otherwise. People aren't generally clamoring to see more male skin in day to day life.
Female sexuality is highly prized whereas male sexuality is almost worthless.
 

MatureDJ

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
10,454
Reaction score
4,315
I always thought it was odd that well-dressed men look so buttoned-up (suits, tuxes) while women dress flamboyantly. In nature, you see the opposite. The male duck has a beautiful green head and wings, the female is brown. Bucks have ten point antlers. And of course peacocks have brilliant plumage while again, peahens have more muted colors. Hence PUA's took the term 'peacocking' to describe any flamboyant accent or apparel to catch attention.

As for skin, that's simple evolution...males are attracted by visuals, and I'm sure the curvaceous female form adapted in part for this reason. I don't know about you guys but I'm constantly undressing women with my eyes and I don't even do it consciously. I think women like the classic male form, too, but 1) usually they already are a little interested in the specific guy and 2) they hate overt displays.
This is because the peacock has his "wardrobe" encoded onto his DNA. A man has his ability to dress well - i.e., wealth - encoded to his bank account, and confiscatible by wifey (or ex-wifey).
 
Top