Why women tend to gravitate to narcistic douchebags?

[Spaz]

That’s not a problem limited to women, as clearly evident from half the posts on this site.

Different sets of rules apply little one, if u were 2 admit it 2 urself, it's these so called nice guys that's ruining society and women in general. They r the actual root cause.

And it's not merely half but a good 90% that's evident from the current postings.

 

[Spaz]

H


I treat my women good but I'm going to fvck them like a champ. I don't believe in doing a bunch of extra for someone who wouldn't do it for me. I don't think that makes me a "nice" guy. Theres a bunch of folks who only think of themselves, and I really don't want to do anything for them. Men including women. Good deeds don't go unpunished for those types.

I personally dont think a woman should be giving a whole lot of puzzy to a guy she cant ask for **** from, who wouldn't do anything for her, I think it's stupid.

My advice 4 you is this 1 simple rule; only do something 4 any women if it amuses you then you won't expect anything in return as "payment" is already received.

Can you now see the difference as opposed 2 most of what the other posters keep complaining abt?

 

[mrgoodstuff]

My advice 4 you is this 1 simple rule; only do something 4 any women if it amuses you then you won't expect anything in return as "payment" is already received.

Can you now see the difference as opposed 2 most of what the other posters keep complaining abt?

Yeah, I don't expect payment. But I don't keep giving to a non giver. I'll tire of it.

 

[AJ84]

Different sets of rules apply little one, if u were 2 admit it 2 urself, it's these so called nice guys that's ruining society and women in general. They r the actual root cause.

And it's not merely half but a good 90% that's evident from the current postings.

What rules are you talking about?
I don’t think so called nice guys are the root of the problem. Woman who chase aholes are part of the problem as well. Anyone who uses people for their own gain without any regard for the other person is like a cancer in the dating pool. I’m not saying everyone has to be super agreeable and accommodating, but selfish and hurtful people are like the polyester of potential mates.

 

[Ranger]

Anyone who uses people for their own gain without any regard for the other person is like a cancer in the dating pool.

This house is made of very thin glass indeed.
You have just encroached on the very evolutionary and biological nature of women. We would not be here if it wasnt for the woman using men for resources. And it doesn’t matter how much money she makes in the modern age. Money doesn’t change biology.
Civilization as we know it is the direct antithesis of a woman’s biology. She is inherantly destructive of the structure of civilization because it is diametrically and dynamically opposed to her biological Hypergamy and destructive duality.
Women as a gender are not evil or conciously aware of it.
Unrestrained Hypergamy IS the bane of our civilization. Because it is the exact opposite of civilization as we know it. Civilization and Hypergamy are mortal enemies.

 

[Ranger]

The Iroquois Comfederation lasted over a thousand years. It is the longest running Republic in history and a large part of our constitution is based on their tenents and axioms.

Here is Magua on the state of women in the western world and more importantly and sadly, the state of its men.

 

[AJ84]

This house is made of very thin glass indeed.
You have just encroached on the very evolutionary and biological nature of women. We would not be here if it wasnt for the woman using men for resources. And it doesn’t matter how much money she makes in the modern age. Money doesn’t change biology.
Civilization as we know it is the direct antithesis of a woman’s biology. She is inherantly destructive of the structure of civilization because it is diametrically and dynamically opposed to her biological Hypergamy and destructive duality.
Women as a gender are not evil or conciously aware of it.
Unrestrained Hypergamy IS the bane of our civilization. Because it is the exact opposite of civilization as we know it. Civilization and Hypergamy are mortal enemies.

And there are countless women’s sites lamenting about something similar and blaming men. It’s old and goes nowhere.
Men and women who are garbage people contribute to this cancer whether they are aware of it or not.

 

[Ranger]

And there are countless women’s sites lamenting about something similar and blaming men. It’s old and goes nowhere.
Men and women who are garbage people contribute to this cancer whether they are aware of it or not.

I wouldn’t know. I don’t do politics. I obviously said it’s not conscious and they are not being evil. Nice try AJ. That dog won’t hunt and it’s either intellectually dishonest or not quite bright from a solipsistic viewpoint.
I do not blame women for it. Said so. Again, not quite bright.
I blame men and politicians pandering to women votes. OF COURSE they are going to vote for their sexual strategy.

 

[AJ84]

The Iroquois Comfederation lasted over a thousand years. It is the longest running Republic in history and a large part of our constitution is based on their tenents and axioms.

Here is Magua on the state of women in the western world and more importantly and sadly, the state of its men.

You know that in the Iroquois culture it was the women who chose the male chief and it was the women who stripped him of that position if he messed up. Just saying.

Look up Iroquois mother clan.

 

[Ranger]

Lol I am well aware. The men run the show. Keep reading. The best warriors and hunters were the life blood of the nation. The women chose the best. They wanted to survive. If food ran low and he didn’t fix it... he was out. That included raiding other tribes for the food and resources if required.

 

[AJ84]

I wouldn’t know. I don’t do politics. I obviously said it’s not conscious and they are not being evil. Nice try AJ. That dog won’t hunt and it’s either intellectually dishonest or not quite bright from a solipsistic viewpoint.
I do not blame women for it. Said so. Again, not quite bright.
I blame men and politicians pandering to women votes. OF COURSE they are going to vote for their sexual strategy.

Doesn’t everyone vote for their own strategy? Yes you are right and I think there are some very dangerous women out there with agendas who should not have any influence. For sure, just like there are some very dangerous men out there who should not have any influence.
I guess I’m sensing that you have this women=evil=destruction of mankind. Maybe I’m reading it wrong.

 

[Ranger]

Doesn’t everyone vote for their own strategy? Yes you are right and I think there are some very dangerous women out there with agendas who should not have any influence. For sure, just like there are some very dangerous men out there who should not have any influence.
I guess I’m sensing that you have this women=evil=destruction of mankind. Maybe I’m reading it wrong.

Yep you are reading it wrong. Women as a gender are NOT evil. I think they are awesome.
Hypergamy and their sexual duality (breeder/provider) is very old and genetically encoded. This worked EXTREMELY well in the tribal phase.
With civilization starting, it was imperative to get men to work. Men are builders. They do not work unless they have a reason to work. Wife and family. Fast forward to present day.
Hypergamy in itself does not tolerate structured civilization. Thus there were restraints involved to limit it. We grew. Men worked. Women made babies. It worked.
Fast forward. Remove restraints. Civilization is inheratly the enemy of Hypergamy. Civilization seeks to survive. Hypergamy seeks to survive.

 

[Ranger]

Doesn’t everyone vote for their own strategy?.

If men voted for their SEXUAL strategy...there wouldn’t be no fault divorce. If there was she can leave but gets nothing she didn’t build, buy with her money or earned in a high production frame.
Men are completely clueless to their own existence within a social structure.

 

[AJ84]

Lol I am well aware. The men run the show. Keep reading. The best warriors and hunters were the life blood of the nation. The women chose the best. They wanted to survive. If food ran low and he didn’t fix it... he was out. That included raiding other tribes for the food and resources if required.

I don’t want to get in a debate with you but I would not agree that the men ran the show there. If you are familiar with their culture then you know that the clan mother was responsible for the welfare of the whole tribe and made alot of decisions around survival including what men went to war. The strongest men were chosen by her to be the warriors and protectors. That sounds like running the show.

 

[AJ84]

If men voted for their SEXUAL strategy...there wouldn’t be no fault divorce. If there was she can leave but gets nothing she didn’t build, buy with her money or earned in a high production frame.
Men are completely clueless to their own existence within a social structure.

I agree with you on that. I think couples should only get what they brought in when they divorce and slit anything they bought or invested together. If she makes more then she should be the one paying child support. For sure.

 

[Ranger]

I don’t want to get in a debate with you but I would not agree that the men ran the show there. If you are familiar with their culture then you know that the clan mother was responsible for the welfare of the whole tribe and made alot of decisions around survival including what men went to war. The strongest men were chosen by her to be the warriors and protectors. That sounds like running the show.

Are you saying women went to war or hunted? Did they vote for the best leader or more access to more d!cks?
Was their vote for a man that was not a bada$$ and utterly ruthless to their enmities? Why could men have more than one wife and the women were confined to high conduct to the point of being scarred for infadelity. Including the use of burning at the stake?
Obviously I don’t support that. Lol

 

[Soflobro#3]

If men voted for their SEXUAL strategy...there wouldn’t be no fault divorce. If there was she can leave but gets nothing she didn’t build, buy with her money or earned in a high production frame.
Men are completely clueless to their own existence within a social structure.

Most men have been brainwashed by feminism which has allowed women to just do whatever they want. Female nature is not inherently bad just as children are not inherently bad. But children need guidence and boundaries, they shouldn't be allowed to just do what they feel like whenever they feel like.

But aj, when convienant, likes to pull the "men do it to". "men are no different" argument. But that's not true. Women are ruled by their emotions which is fueled by their hormones and evolutionary conditioning .

The main reason for the a lot of the problems in terms of gender dynamics in our culture is 1. The false premise that women were generally victimized by men in the past and 2. That women are just as logically and objective as men. This is simply not true.

The fact that women are so emotionally driven is what makes them so easily decieved. Like children.

 

[Soflobro#3]

I don’t want to get in a debate with you but I would not agree that the men ran the show there. If you are familiar with their culture then you know that the clan mother was responsible for the welfare of the whole tribe and made alot of decisions around survival including what men went to war. The strongest men were chosen by her to be the warriors and protectors. That sounds like running the show.

If that's the full truth what would be the point of having a clan chief?

Also look at the surviving matriarchal societies in the world today. They're stuck in the year 1000 ad

 

[Ranger]

The fact that women are so emotionally driven is what makes them so easily decieved. Like children.

Lol there’s that “child/children” word again.

 

[Soflobro#3]

Lol there’s that “child/children” word again.

Honestly I don't care what age a woman is, what her education level is, how much money she has or how much success she has, they're all like children in many ways.

This whole feminist idea that aj and many other women have that women are just as capable as men in many aspects is all about their egos. Women have very inflated egos, more than men, which makes them easily manipulated.