Women literally have the power to decide who lives or dies

[Augustus_McCrae]

Hat tip to @DEEZEDBRAH for mentioning this in another thread.

Women have absolute power via abortion to decide who lives & who dies. They have the ultimate power to decide if a man’s offspring get to survive. The father has zero say or influence in this situation.

Imagine if men had the right to decide if a woman’s offspring would live or die. If the father could unilaterally decide that a pregnancy would be terminated and that the mother had zero say in the decision.

As it is, a man has zero say and zero rights with regard to abortion. Can you imagine the outcry from women if they were in the same situation?

And philosophically, you can make the argument that the power women have to decide who does and does not get born is the ultimate power.

-Augustus-

 

[Alvafe]

feh if you only think the only way to kill someone is with abortion then you are right, she could just toss the kid from a window, let the kid sleep to dead, not feed, drop the kid in a dumpster, there is several ways to kill people, and only way she will abort a kid is if she belive you are poor

 

[highSpeed]

feh if you only think the only way to kill someone is with abortion then you are right, she could just toss the kid from a window, let the kid sleep to dead, not feed, drop the kid in a dumpster, there is several ways to kill people, and only way she will abort a kid is if she belive you are poor

yes, but in abortion, it is completely legal. with all of the mental health issues, which women experience more than men, at least in the current societal structure, I can easily imagine a woman who punishes a man by terminating the pregnancy. Would this be most women? I hope not but I think it would be foolish to argue against the fact that there are women out there who would be ok with doing this, as either a form of control or punishment on the man. Make no mistake, putting women on the exact same footing and as some would argue, on better footing than men and this is the result.

 

[Augustus_McCrae]

yes, but in abortion, it is completely legal. with all of the mental health issues, which women experience more than men, at least in the current societal structure, I can easily imagine a woman who punishes a man by terminating the pregnancy. Would this be most women? I hope not but I think it would be foolish to argue against the fact that there are women out there who would be ok with doing this, as either a form of control or punishment on the man. Make no mistake, putting women on the exact same footing and as some would argue, on better footing than men and this is the result.

Make no mistake, if a pregnancy occurs, men have zero say and zero rights to decide whether or not his baby is allowed to born. Men have no “footing”, legally, it is 100% the woman’s decision.

-Augustus-

 

[highSpeed]

Make no mistake, if a pregnancy occurs, men have zero say and zero rights to decide whether or not his baby is allowed to born. Men have no “footing”, legally, it is 100% the woman’s decision.

-Augustus-

agreed but I'm saying the obvious push for woman's "equality" has really ruined western society. And agreed, there are ways in which a man has no footing. I think this is all by design, this is the end of western society. Weaken men, disempower them and then let women run roughshod over men. then you can destroy the western world. they are well on their way.

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

The father has zero say or influence in this situation.

BS. Any dude can carefully choose who he bangs and who he doesn't.

The main reason why ladies have so much power today is men are DESPERATE to bang anything and WILL bang anything WITHOUT any qualifying.

Men do WHATEVER it takes to get laid, and when they do get laid, they expect the lady to suddenly bend over backwards and accommodate them.

If men were MUCH MORE CAREFUL where they put their pee pee, women wouldn't be so entitled.

 

[Augustus_McCrae]

BS. Any dude can carefully choose who he bangs and who he doesn't.

The main reason why ladies have so much power today is men are DESPERATE to bang anything and WILL bang anything WITHOUT any qualifying.

Men do WHATEVER it takes to get laid, and when they do get laid, they expect the lady to suddenly bend over backwards and accommodate them.

If men were MUCH MORE CAREFUL where they put their pee pee, women wouldn't be so entitled.

The issue being discussed was not who a man chooses to bang. The issue was who has the right to unilaterally terminate a pregnancy. And in that case a man has zero legal rights to his unborn child.

-Augustus-

 

[sazc]

Really tho, take back your power by DEMANDING birth control for men.

None of this chatter will be happening if MEN had the power to control and decide who they wanted to impregnate.

Seriously, it's way past time this was a reality. Women would be SOOOO good to men in order to lock them down for spawn

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

And in that case a man has zero legal rights to his unborn child.

If it's important to you to have a child, then you need to do what it takes to have a child. That includes finding the proper woman to carry that child.

If you want to bang whomever you want and expect them to carry your child to term, that raises some other questions.

If you, the child owner, doesn't have sufficient funds to raise that baby to responsible adulthood, are you expecting the STATE (e.g. taxpayers) to do the job for you?

Does that fathers INCOME have zero impact on the woman's OBLIGATION to have the child?

 

[Augustus_McCrae]

If it's important to you to have a child, then you need to do what it takes to have a child. That includes finding the proper woman to carry that child.

If you want to bang whomever you want and expect them to carry your child to term, that raises some other questions.

If you, the child owner, doesn't have sufficient funds to raise that baby to responsible adulthood, are you expecting the STATE (e.g. taxpayers) to do the job for you?

Does that fathers INCOME have zero impact on the woman's OBLIGATION to have the child?

Again, what you have mentioned has nothing to do with the fact that a man has zero legal rights with regard to his unborn child.

And your mention of the state, and a father’s income is a red herring. A man could have a good income or zero income. Neither make any difference with regard to his lack of legal rights for his unborn child.

-Augustus-

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

Neither make any difference with regard to his lack of legal rights for his unborn child.

So what? You know that going into any situation. How is this idea causing anybody any grief? Since you KNOW that getting a woman pregnant guarantee you a baby, why not just make sure you make a baby with a woman who wants to have it with you?

What, EXACTLY, is this truth keeping you from having or getting?

Or are you just angry that this situation exists in the abstract?

 

[Augustus_McCrae]

So what? You know that going into any situation. How is this idea causing anybody any grief? Since you KNOW that getting a woman pregnant guarantee you a baby, why not just make sure you make a baby with a woman who wants to have it with you?

What, EXACTLY, is this truth keeping you from having or getting?

Or are you just angry that this situation exists in the abstract?

It’s obvious that I’m wasting my time responding to you.

-Augustus-

 

[AJ84]

What about a law that states if the woman doesn’t want the child and the father doesn’t want her to abort, the woman has to give birth the baby and relinquish her rights to the child, giving all rights to the father to raise. On his own.

Problem solved.

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

I suppose that as a man, every time you have sex you could require the woman to sign a contract saying that if she gets pregnant she is legally obligated to carry the child to term and give to you when it's born.

Busting out such a contract as you're about to go balls deep might ruin the mood....

 

[Augustus_McCrae]

What about a law that states if the woman doesn’t want the child and the father doesn’t want her to abort, the woman has to give birth the baby and relinquish her rights to the child, giving all rights to the father to raise. On his own.

Problem solved.

Finally, a response to the actual subject of the thread.

An interesting idea, but would the converse hold? For example, if the man wanted to terminate the pregnancy, but she wanted to carry the baby to term, would he be allowed to relinquish all rights and responsibilities for the child as she would?

-Augustus-

 

[AJ84]

Finally, a response to the actual subject of the thread.

An interesting idea, but would the converse hold? For example, if the man wanted to terminate the pregnancy, but she wanted to carry the baby to term, would he be allowed to relinquish all rights and responsibilities for the child as she would?

-Augustus-

Yes, it should go both ways for sure. I think that’s perfectly fair.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Hat tip to @DEEZEDBRAH for mentioning this in another thread.

Big ups Augustus mate. I appreciated the acknowledgement but there is no original idea or thought.

I was recognized Rollo's genius in a RMG podcast.

The point being, to seek self knowledge, explore consciousness, pursue self actualization.

The exchange of ideas is Paramount to our journey and IMHO the difference of success or failure.

Women have absolute power via abortion to decide who lives & who dies. They have the ultimate power to decide if a man’s offspring get to survive. The father has zero say or influence in this situation.

In Dr. Helen Smith's book, Men on Strike, she depicted men have ZERO REPRODUCTION RIGHTS the moment you nut. The NBA actually put out warnings to players after a series of sperm jacking occurred. Women are ****ed (much of the time). The kangaroo court systems on campus due to female entitlement and not getting the ring. The jion ghmeshi court case comes to mind whereby fossils of SMV raged when man pushing fifty wouldn't give the Ring + was smashing top form SMV. These haggard brods lied under oath, he was acquitted of crimes, and they still paraded in front of the court like they were getting an award. Soaking up in their victimhood.

These are nuanced points but, if you look at genetic ostracism, you realize something ridiculous.

That being, women are genocidal.

Sit with that for a moment.

Imagine if men had the right to decide if a woman’s offspring would live or die. If the father could unilaterally decide that a pregnancy would be terminated and that the mother had zero say in the decision.

The government in China does or did this. The fallout is an abundance of men and female entitlement on steroids. The culture deems 25+ as "left over women."

As it is, a man has zero say and zero rights with regard to abortion. Can you imagine the outcry from women if they were in the same situation?

The problem being the lack of spine in these men who let them out of the bedroom and kitchen.

Remember Godfather? Cay brags she aborted Michael's child and repeats multiple times before slapping the **** out of her.

I don't recommend violence but in the middle East, she would die.

And philosophically, you can make the argument that the power women have to decide who does and does not get born is the ultimate power.

-Augustus-

I run a tight ship.

I lead.

She follows or #nextset.

The target is top form SMV (18-23). I don't care about baby rabies or her looking to build a nest once her best days are over.

#donotwant!

The time for pity party or amateur hour is over. The dream of a wife, children, white picket fence is over.


Fellas, draw a line in the ****ing sand.

Set boundaries.

Zero tolerance policy for female logic.


New girls are turning 18 everyday.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

Imagine if a chicken had lips - it could whistle.

As taiyuu_otoko said, make better decisions. She can't get pregnant if you don't stick it in. Hoping and wishing for a world where women don't carry fetuses around for 9 months is simply living in fantasy.

Governments can decide if you live or die, too, if you're stupid and run afoul of them.

This is female logic.

Begging to get cucked. No marker for female behavior. She can go psycho and we blame men.

It reminds me of the Cassie woman who murderers her kid and gets off.

In before we blame men.

 

[sazc]

Really this is all about women who chose to have the baby when the guy doesn't want it, isn't it?

That is the power that you guys are really talking about, the power to be roped into raising a child and paying for a child when you have no say in the situation.

This has nothing to do with the power women have to kill your offspring

 

[sazc]

This is female logic.

Begging to get cucked. No marker for female behavior. She can go psycho and we blame men.

It reminds me of the Cassie woman who murderers her kid and gets off.

In before we blame men.

haha, this is equivalent to just saying:

I" I don't like what you're saying so I'm just going to insult you in my reply, not actually reply to you with anything intelligent"

Oy vey