Do you think the idea that incel violence would end if there were enforced monogamy is absurd?

[Mike32ct]

If they are able to be chosen anywhere it will help their ego and help them be attractive elsewhere .

Fair enough. At a minimum, it may help his IDGAF attitude.

 

[corrector]

You presume that most white guys would be satisfied with an ethnic girl.

I don't have to presume, I'm seeing predominately White guy Asian girl couples here in Toronto more than I'm seeing White and White couples. Now, I don't know where you are from, but chances are likely the same in other parts of the U.S. too unless you live in a really predominately white state.

Now that said, your theory does explain the miscegenation of esteemed Southern politicians like Thomas Jefferson and Strom Thurmond, the latter of which was considered very racist.

The key issue is why is it mainly white males wrecking the idea of involuntary celibacy by going on mass shootings or killing-sprees and then cry incel in some tweet, facebook post, or whatever. Blacks and other races could be complaining and reacting to involuntary celibacy, but they are not resorting to such extremes. Incel is a modern society issue that probably started in the early 2000s, especially with the advent of the internet age leading to more men being priced out of the market or being able to compete with Chads.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

Fair enough. At a minimum, it may help his IDGAF attitude.

Come back stateside and start banging something.

 

[Spaz]

On the "Everybody pays" thing, it certainly is TECHNICALLY true because even Chad might have to buy two beers and some popcorn before Stacey comes over his place. But it avoids the real issue that the PRICE men pay varies a LOT. Chad is getting it for negligible cost and probably little hassle or commitment. An average looking guy might have to seriously "beta bux*" and get into a very expensive LTR and possibly marriage for some sex. Or hire a hooker at a few hundred per session.

I have no problem with guys paying, but I've always cringed when they justify it by saying "Everybody pays."

*Hate the term but it's a slang that is easily understood here.

If u r paying something as an investment with really good returns then ur initial investment means nothing.

Say, I spend on a girl $300 over the weekend >She falls head over heels in ♡ > She proceeds to invest her time/body & $$ towards me = win win situation.

So everybody pays in the end, it's just either a profitable investment or a poor lack of judgement on the investment

 

[Who Dares Win]

The point is not "paying" itself, the point is the rate of return given that payment and the amount of payment compared to the quality of the goods received, think of cost/benefits ratio.

One gets a new car for few bucks while the other gets a used broken one (that doesnt even starts every morning) for 10 times the amount.