TheMonkeyKing
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2014
- Messages
- 2,327
- Reaction score
- 1,419
Apparently now proportions are now 49.6% female, 50.4% male.
You replay the conversation at 2 a.m. She texted back fast yesterday. Today, nothing. Was that smile friendly or flirty? What did the shoulder touch mean?
Every hour you spend decoding her signals drains your confidence and hands her the controls. Women can sense that insecurity from across the room — and it repels them.
One of the "22 Rules" kills the obsession on the spot: assume she likes you, and act accordingly. Sounds too simple. Works anyway.
Her interest tends to rise to meet your expectations. Psychologists call it a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.
Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.
The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.
It's not really the surplus of men in general that's the issue, but more specifically the surplus of chumps and feminists. Whether it's 51% men / 49% women or vice versa, I don't think it really matters. The problem is men are becoming more like women, and women are becoming more like men. And the result is basically a failure. If we try to teach men to be "equal" to women, then they act more submissive. If we teach women to be "equal" to men, then they act more dominant. This is not how we're biologically made though. Despite this supposed "equality," women still retain their s3x appeal. So as politically correct and forward thinking as this may sound... what's the actual result? Men acting like a bunch of f*cking cowards endlessly supplicating to overly priveledged women who think they're princesses.I made a pretty in-depth thread on this a while ago. In short, we are living in the largest surplus of men to women so far in our species's history. This not only exponentially cheapens the worth of men as a whole and forces men to compete with each other, it's made worse exponentially again by today's technology.
If you're asking yourself why so many women are crazy today or whatever, the answer is that just like our bodies are not wired to live on cheetos and soda, their brains were never wired to receive such a ridiculously exorbitant amount of free material (money/protection/etc.) and immaterial (validation/emotional rush/etc.) male resources. Their brains get overloaded and go into a combination of frenzy (AW) and not registering & devaluing the men around them, like an insulin overload that causes diabetes.
And India and Pakistan. Even Vietnam. Combined, that's 2,87 billion people or 39,5% of the world's population. Sucks to be there I guess.That's because of China. They kill first borns if they are female. So China has a very large surplus of men.
So worldwide.. there are slightly more men.. BUT its really just China. If you don't live in China.. chances are there are more women in your country than men.