what a sicko :crazy:KarmaSutra said:You want to know if I value a dogs life over most humans -
ABSO-FVCKING-LUTELY! - we have the value of choice. Dogs have training or instinct to rely on only.
I have 5 girls and would kill some fool if they looked at any of them with harmful intent. With a smile on my face as I slit their throat ear to ear.
sportFrancisco d'Anconia said:Sport hunting or just pinging wrens in your back yard during halftime?
Other than the legal ramifications why don't you just set in your back yard and pick off random animals on a whim?j-flex said:sport
legal ramifications like being charged with counts of animal cruelty?Francisco d'Anconia said:Other than the legal ramifications why don't you just set in your back yard and pick off random animals on a whim?
I'm just asking whether a person would start shooting neighborhood animals on a whim if there wasn't any retribution for doing so. I'm not saying if they would do it if it were legal, just whether or not they would do it.penkitten said:legal ramifications like being charged with counts of animal cruelty?
oh i see.. carry on dearFrancisco d'Anconia said:I'm just asking whether a person would start shooting neighborhood animals on a whim if there wasn't any retribution for doing so. I'm not saying if they would do it if it were legal, just whether or not they would do it.
People who abuse animals do show evidence that they'd harm people especially if they could get away with it. But some from the other side do have a point about people putting animals above humans. You have people that will abuse and would likely kill humans for sport, yet abhor animal cruelty. I'm not saying anyone here is like that, but Peta a nd some enviromentalist put pond algae and trees above human needs. That's just weird.Francisco d'Anconia said:I'm just asking whether a person would start shooting neighborhood animals on a whim if there wasn't any retribution for doing so. I'm not saying if they would do it if it were legal, just whether or not they would do it.
dont most serial killers get their start from harming the neighborhood strays when they are kids?ketostix said:People who abuse animals do show evidence that they'd harm people especially if they could get away with it. But some from the other side do have a point about people putting animals above humans. You have people that will abuse and would likely kill humans for sport, yet abhor animal cruelty. I'm not saying anyone here is like that, but Peta a nd some enviromentalist put pond algae and trees above human needs. That's just weird.
penkitten said:dont most serial killers get their start from harming the neighborhood strays when they are kids?
I've heard that can be a warning sign, particular (IIRC) if they tend to take trophies. I have no issue with this bloke needing some help but the cries for summary execution and testicular cancer are a bit silly.penkitten said:dont most serial killers get their start from harming the neighborhood strays when they are kids?
could you give us an example keto ?ketostix said:But the radicals that I were refering to are more along the lines of mass murders, a different type of pathology.
penkitten said:could you give us an example keto ?
An aside: The best contribution to society by PETAketostix said:People who abuse animals do show evidence that they'd harm people especially if they could get away with it. But some from the other side do have a point about people putting animals above humans. You have people that will abuse and would likely kill humans for sport, yet abhor animal cruelty. I'm not saying anyone here is like that, but Peta a nd some enviromentalist put pond algae and trees above human needs. That's just weird.
It's fairly simple. Perhaps perusing your fellow country boy Dr. Phil's message boards would help with the clarification?Aboleo said:I'm sorry Karma, I'm not sure if I completely understand what you are trying to say here, and I don't want to get the wrong idea... would you please clarify and elaborate on this thought so that a simple country boy like me could better understand it?
Nice try but I won't bite that hook friend. You're intentionally misinterpreting what I said. But it's trite and a good indicator of what kind of person you are.I agree... killing someone over looking at you, or someone around you and then actually slicing their throat and enjoying the process is absurd and shows that the individual has some pretty severe psychosis.
Actually, no it wasn't. Explain yourself or silence yourself... the 'choice' is yours, my friend.KarmaSutra said:It's fairly simple.
You "bit it" a long time ago and now I've got you hook, line and sinker. How exactly could I have misinterpreted the intent or your statement? You were quite clear in your description of committing an act of cold-blooded murder.KarmaSutra said:Nice try but I won't bite that hook friend. You're intentionally misinterpreting what I said. But it's trite and a good indicator of what kind of person you are.
LOL. Anyway it's not so much Peta as it is the fringe element associated with it.Francisco d'Anconia said:
Speaking about the fringe element, I'm still curious to hear whether the guys who don't feel tossing a puppy off a cliff is a bad thing would shoot (or kill via your preferred method) any of the animals that you'd find in your backyard if there wasn't any retribution? C'mon, shoot a squirrel, wrench a wren's neck, chop up a cat, drop kick a dog? C'mon, it's not a big deal, right?ketostix said:LOL. Anyway it's not so much Peta as it is the fringe element associated with it.
Francisco d'Anconia said:Speaking about the fringe element, I'm still curious to hear whether the guys who don't feel tossing a puppy off a cliff is a bad thing would shoot (or kill via your preferred method) any of the animals that you'd find in your backyard if there wasn't any retribution? C'mon, shoot a squirrel, wrench a wren's neck, chop up a cat, drop kick a dog? C'mon, it's not a big deal, right?