You see that brings up the fact that Bush and the US corporations won't do it. Because it's not profitable for them. Waging war and Winning war are two totally different things. The best way to confuse the enemy prolong the fighting is to have them kill each other. That's what is happening in Iraq war right now, the ****tes and Sunnis are killing each other. Bush's plan was totally successful, he is getting money for oil that's used by the military. Why would he want sabotage his profits by risking his earnings? If US invades Iran, the whole middle east will turn into a war zone and US will pull out. He doesn't want that.Obsidian said:Iran signed a treaty whereby they agreed not to develop nukes. They're abusing the technology they acquired from the treaty -- and using it to develop nukes!
Yeah, that's exactly what I said we should do. And I don't think the Iraqi instability is a good reason to hold off the invasion. As I said before, if we dealt with Iran, the insurgents in Iraq would lose much of their support.
And besides, they're both third-world countries. We oughta be able to take on them both. The only reason we don't do it is because we want to be popular. Wouldn't want to tick anyone off...after all, dude, let's just go with the flow...
You see US already ticked everyone off because they don't know the action taken the nation is caused by the government or the people. That's why they become anti-American. I would too if someone invaded my country without a valid reason and set up bases. 9/11 happened because of BLOW BACK, if you don't know what that means look it up. CIA would know a lot about it.