jophil28 said:
YEs, it is like a drug because the pleasureable feelings of being with an attractive vibrant woman for a few hours are similar to the heady effects of a recreational drug. Brain chemicals are altered, your emotions atre tumbling, your adrenalin is pumping and you are in a high state of arousal and stimulation. The sexual tension builds as you lay the foundations and guide her forward to the target zone.. IT is human nature to want MORE of such a rewarding experience and to prolong the experience .
To call it an "insecurity " misses the essence of this whole experience.
It ain't insecure at all it is just great fun.
RT, sometimes a banana is just a banana.
Granted, I'll give you the chemical aspect of such an experience, but then, by this definition, would you also agree that a person can develop a 'tolerance' to the drug if exposed to it often enough? And by the same definition would not a person so deprived of it or unexperienced with the effects of it be more susceptible to it, thus making a guy prone to insecurities or altered perceptions? And, much like a junkie, would a guy so deprived, be more apt to seek out a "fix" by compromising his own interests and identifying as much as possible with a woman in order to facilitate the effects of the drug?
I'll be the first to point out the biochemical flush of hormones and endorphins in such an instance, but I'm less concerned about the rush than I am the results of, and the application of, what's going on in the instance. Human beings have a natural impulse to avoid conflict, yet we can train ourselves to fight (martial arts for example) and thereby confidently hold our ground in the face of conflict when our natural self-preservation impulse prompts us to avoid a dangerous situation. We can do the same with the nervousness that comes from public speaking and I'm sure there a lot of other examples where the adrenaline would have us avoid an uncomfortable situation.
Often times conditioning ourselves to do what's best for us seems counterintuitive. Remember your driver's ed class in high school when they taught you that if you ever find yourself in a skid to turn into the skid rather than slam on the brakes? Every part of you wants to stand on the brakes to stop the car, it seems logical and you want to exit a life-threatening situation, but this only makes the skid worse. However, when you force yourself to do the opposite of what seems will work and turn into the skid the car rights itself and straightens out.
Using this example, it would seem that the right idea would be to do the intuitive and perpetuate the good feeling rush of the date by rattling off as much detail about yourself in the shortest amount of time to get to intimacy. It seems to make sense since every guy's been told the way into a woman's pants is to make her feel comfortable with you, to be her friend, be sensitive, listen to her, etc. So he can't appreciate the necessary anxiety that comes from sexual tension in attraction. The attraction phase is uncomfortable and the natural, predictable response is to avoid the discomfort. So while he may be high on endorphins at the time, his rationale is still deductive - how does he get from point A to point B to point C?