Hello Friend,

If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.

It will be the most efficient use of your time.

And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.

Thank you for visiting and have a great day!

girl told you her exs are all black or was a black guy

Son of anarchy

Don Juan
Joined
Jun 14, 2009
Messages
141
Reaction score
2
After reading this topic i realise how things work in USA about ethnic tensions,im fu***ing glad to be in Europe since i dont have to live day after days this tensions that show themselves even in the dating field.
Well here we just have to argue among liberalists and socialists.
Im afraid you guys in 200yrs from now will still be arguing about whos good and whos bad,what A did to B and what B did to A.
 

Truman181

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
298
Reaction score
27
DonGorgon said:
^^that is the dumbest analogy attempt i have every seen..lol..
You're a child. Since you have no rebuttal your only response is name calling and a lame attempt at contempt "lol".

Nowhere is it written that "unless you are attracted to all races, you are a racist person".

I thought the COMPARISON to the unfair INTOLERANCE of homosexuals would be a simple enough example that anyone could follow. Guess I was wrong "lol"
 

ketostix

Banned
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
3,873
Reaction score
55
PS in his own words said white women who date black guys believe they are giving the finger to every white person in their lives. He also believes an erroneous claim that humans all came out of Africa. Actually the most credible evidence of humans farthest back in history comes out of Europe. There's the cave paintings near France dated 25,000 years ago, and the ice man the oldest human remains was found in the European Alps. The evidence of humans in Africa first amounts to dubious bone fragments that often times turn out to be animal, or some dubious genetic hypothesis. Point is people believe unproven things and that forms and supports the basis of their beliefs. Common average genetic knowledge tells you that earliest man would have to be fairly nuetral phenotype or genotype. Basically a mutt which cuacasians generally are. So if one is going to make a simple statement it would be more accurate to say all humans came from medium complexion or brown people or even caucasian. I simply prefer a medium phenotype.
 

DonGorgon

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 28, 2007
Messages
4,685
Reaction score
103
Location
Studying the fact that all lies contain fragments
Truman181 said:
You're a child. Since you have no rebuttal your only response is name calling and a lame attempt at contempt "lol".

Nowhere is it written that "unless you are attracted to all races, you are a racist person".

I thought the COMPARISON to the unfair INTOLERANCE of homosexuals would be a simple enough example that anyone could follow. Guess I was wrong "lol"
I gave an explanation as to why your analogy is dumb... i did not call you any names i described you silly analogy as dumb. which it is. .. all humans are the same.. we "choose" to be different as a part of natural competition..
 

ketostix

Banned
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
3,873
Reaction score
55
Cr1msonKing said:
http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSL1885586220070718

There goes your head in you a$$ theory, refuted by scientists rather than rednecks hypothesizing in a bar.

The first human evolution occurred in Africa.

Your putting words in PS's mouth. He gave props to women who had the courage to go out with a black male, cuz of the stigma attached to interracial dating, and the tribulations she would face. He didn't say their doing it for the sole reason of the taboo of going black.

You just love to translate EVERYTHING you hear into something that fits your reality.


Where is your proof? About the phenotype.
Dude you don't know anything about evolution. Let's just say evolution was a fact. The evidence that humans evolved in Africa has a lot of problems. The credible evidence of the first humans is found in Europe, but lets put that aside. Anyone knows that black is a dominate phenotype and an divergence in phenotype from a mixed phenotype. You could not breed light complexioned blondes from black lineage, just as you couldn't take recessive blondes and create a black lineage. The two extremes are obviously divergent tribes from a middle genotype. The first humans had to be a middle phenotype and genotype. It's just self-evident to anyone who's observed various animal breeds and has an even basic understanding of phenotype expression.

The point is, it's really obviously you're the one that's ethno-centric. It's clear with your terms like "Redneck" and your implication that someone like PS's beliefs are backed up by "proven science". The cedible evidence is that humans were in Europe and the middle-east first. You can call that ignorant if you want. I call it ethno-centric an agenda driven to make statements like "Everyone came from blacks". Everyone came from the same first species but we don't exactly know how they looked and behaved. Most likely they were a middle phenotype.
 

speakeasy

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
2,782
Reaction score
77
Damn, you guys are still at this?

Speaking of white women, I think they look great in their early to mid 20s, but have you guys noticed that once they hit 30-35ish the slope down is pretty steep? Especially if they've spent time out at the beach? Maybe that's why Hefner keeps spinning his plates with a fresh rotation of 18-25 year old blondes and gives them the boot before they get too old.

Can you believe Donatella Versace is ONLY 54???
http://www.celebrity-gossip.net/images/thumbnails/donatella-versace-12248-8.jpg

Now compare to Tina Turner who is just shy of 70:
http://www.myclassiclyrics.com/artist_biographies/Tina_Turner_Biography_2.jpg

Crazy. Not trying to start any sh*t, just making an observation. My parents are both almost 60 and neither of them has a single wrinkle. But most my white friends are showing age lines by their late 20s. I wonder why that is?

Maybe my plan should be to bang young white girls while I'm single, but marry a black woman when I'm ready for the long haul.
 

ketostix

Banned
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
3,873
Reaction score
55
There's plenty of white women that age well and look good for their age. Demi Moore is one example. You just have to stay away from the over sun exposured blondes. I'm not into fair complexioned blondes anyway. Generally Asian women age the best so if I'm going to go out of my race I could always marry an Asian woman when I'm older :cool:.
 

Latim

Don Juan
Joined
Jul 22, 2008
Messages
24
Reaction score
1
Location
many places
ketostix said:
There's plenty of white women that age well and look good for their age. Demi Moore is one example. You just have to stay away from the over sun exposured blondes. I'm not into fair complexioned blondes anyway. Generally Asian women age the best so if I'm going to go out of my race I could always marry an Asian woman when I'm older :cool:.
interracial marriage? :trouble:

We don't take kindly to your kind. :trouble:
 

rakishness

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Sep 16, 2006
Messages
484
Reaction score
4
ketostix said:
PS in his own words said white women who date black guys believe they are giving the finger to every white person in their lives. He also believes an erroneous claim that humans all came out of Africa. Actually the most credible evidence of humans farthest back in history comes out of Europe. There's the cave paintings near France dated 25,000 years ago, and the ice man the oldest human remains was found in the European Alps. The evidence of humans in Africa first amounts to dubious bone fragments that often times turn out to be animal, or some dubious genetic hypothesis. Point is people believe unproven things and that forms and supports the basis of their beliefs. Common average genetic knowledge tells you that earliest man would have to be fairly nuetral phenotype or genotype. Basically a mutt which cuacasians generally are. So if one is going to make a simple statement it would be more accurate to say all humans came from medium complexion or brown people or even caucasian. I simply prefer a medium phenotype.
That's debatable. I only posted the clip because I loved the way he made fun of this site. Calling sosuave the "funny papers". HAHA.
 

Truman181

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
298
Reaction score
27
DonGorgon said:
all humans are the same.. we "choose" to be different as a part of natural competition..
So it's your opinion that we all inherently the same but "choose" to be different?

A gay person chooses to be attracted to other men?

A black/white guy chooses to be attracted to black/white women?

My argument was that a person is attracted to whatever it is they are attracted to.

A gay person is attracted to other men and that is fine for them. But I don't think it's a choice.

Some white/black guys are only attracted to white/black women and that is fine but it's not a choice.

Some white/black guys are only attracted to blonds, or brunettes, or girls with blue eyes, or green eyes, or small butts, or big butts, or girls with long legs, or short girls, or girls with big t1ts or girls with small t1ts.

My point is EVERYONE has a preference. Everyone has criteria for their attraction. And that is not a choice.
 

oakraiderz2

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 26, 2002
Messages
4,633
Reaction score
28
Age
37
Location
Colorado
ketostix said:
PS in his own words said white women who date black guys believe they are giving the finger to every white person in their lives. He also believes an erroneous claim that humans all came out of Africa. Actually the most credible evidence of humans farthest back in history comes out of Europe. There's the cave paintings near France dated 25,000 years ago, and the ice man the oldest human remains was found in the European Alps. The evidence of humans in Africa first amounts to dubious bone fragments that often times turn out to be animal, or some dubious genetic hypothesis. Point is people believe unproven things and that forms and supports the basis of their beliefs. Common average genetic knowledge tells you that earliest man would have to be fairly nuetral phenotype or genotype. Basically a mutt which cuacasians generally are. So if one is going to make a simple statement it would be more accurate to say all humans came from medium complexion or brown people or even caucasian. I simply prefer a medium phenotype.
I think you know youre full of sh*t but you like to see how far you can push it. Clearly youve never taken an anthro class, because if you had, you would know what theories of evolution exist. And you would know that research most heavily supports the out of africa theory. 25,000 years ago is the best you can do? How about the autralopithicine "lucy" who was discovered about 3.5 million years ago. Youre so biased and despise the idea of dark skinned people being the first humans to walk the earth. No one is trying to say everyone came from blacks. Thats just how you see it and you hate the thought of coming from something like that. If melatonin is responsible for our pigment, dont you think its possible that over the course of millions of years, people in colder climates stopped producing as much melatonin because of cold temperatures?

Youre STILL trying to say other people are ethnocentric when clearly you are. Neanderthals were around 25,000 years ago, whose to say they didnt they didnt create the paintings? I bet you dont want a neanderthal to be the first humans on earth...
 

AceJack

New Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2009
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am not going to read all 12 pages but my answer to the OP is I would not care. If one does, I am sorry to say, you are racist.
 

Truman181

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
298
Reaction score
27
oakraiderz2 said:
Youre STILL trying to say other people are ethnocentric when clearly you are. Neanderthals were around 25,000 years ago, whose to say they didnt they didnt create the paintings? I bet you dont want a neanderthal to be the first humans on earth...
I think it's silly to say that blacks came from Africa. How do we know that 20,000 years ago black people weren't in the US and white people weren't in Asia and "Asian" people weren't in Africa?

I actually think it's silly to label someone as AFRICAN-American just because they are black.

People are too sensitive. I call a black person black just as I call a white person white. It's kind of a joke to pretend that we don't have different skin color. We just need to accept our differences instead of pretending we don't have any. Because at the end of the day, we're still just people.
 

ketostix

Banned
Joined
Feb 10, 2005
Messages
3,873
Reaction score
55
Truman181 said:
I think it's silly to say that blacks came from Africa. How do we know that 20,000 years ago black people weren't in the US and white people weren't in Asia and "Asian" people weren't in Africa?

I actually think it's silly to label someone as AFRICAN-American just because they are black.

People are too sensitive. I call a black person black just as I call a white person white. It's kind of a joke to pretend that we don't have different skin color. We just need to accept our differences instead of pretending we don't have any. Because at the end of the day, we're still just people.
Exactly. A lot of these anthropologist can't be taken seriously. They are obviously picking an agenda and trying to prove it later. I mean how silly is the theory that "cold weather made people lose their melatonin and hot weather did the opposite". The Sahara and the middle east is the hottest and sunniest region on earth and North Africans and middle-easterners have been in this desert for as long as anyone can go back in history and are light-medium complexioned and catergorized as Caucasian. It's obvious to any non biased person with half a brain that blacks and whites are two diferent tribes most likely splintered off from a previous tribe. And the difference isn't just skin color, it's also genotype differences. They've found huminoid artifacts in Europe just as old as what's been found in Africa. Maybe we did descend from Neanderthals. No one really knows. But trust me there's an agenda in certain fields of "science". Regardless of origin we're different races now and I don't see anything wrong with that in itself.
 

speakeasy

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 4, 2006
Messages
2,782
Reaction score
77
Cr1msonKing said:
PS stated that the first Humans evolved in Africa.

Where as your stating they evolved in the Middle East and Europe, 25,000 years ago.


My university anthropology class teaches me the "Out of Africa" theory.

The common belief about our origins among the majority of scientists is that we evolved in Africa, around 200,000.


I'd love to see links to factual evidence. I just can't hold you on your word, when I've been told otherwise.

The internet makes searching easy, and since your belief is "right", it shouldn't be too hard to find on Google.
Don't hold your breath, everytime you challenge him with links, stats and actual facts, he replies with anecdotes and claims that the researches and scientists you pull your facts from are all biased, yet provides no proof of for his theories. You're wasting your time with him. That's why I got out the debate.
 

Truman181

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
298
Reaction score
27
Cr1msonKing said:
PS stated that the first Humans evolved in Africa.
PS? No acronyms man, I'm not the brightest bulb in the box.

Listen my whole point was it doesn't matter where we came from. We all have differences based on our races. Let's accept those differences instead of trying to pretend we're all the same.

I'm being naive. I know that.
 
Top