Hello Friend,
If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.
It will be the most efficient use of your time.
And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.
Thank you for visiting and have a great day!
My hunch is that nearly all of these relationships or what we call “boyfriends and girlfriends” are utterly worthless, hence why they are changed like underwear.
You have a valid point on the worthlessness of relationships in this era. This goes well with my heavily promoted "shelf life of goodness of relationships" idea. Marriages are worthless in this era as well. No fault divorce exists and women can leave whenever they want. Additionally, the family court system benefits women. There's not much of an incentive for women to stay in marriages in the current era.
Yes, read Taken into Custody and the New Politics of Sex by Dr. Stephen Baskerville if you wish to take a deep dive.
One way. Another way is to impregnate her when she is young.
Is that the chick that was on Mythbusters?
I remember that statement. I think the Murphy Brown character - i.e., VERY successful female professional - is really too small of cohort to make a difference. Most professional women aren't like that, and would want marry to get the full family - with the problem being their hypergamy.
With Gen-Z's sex habits, it's not shocking, nor hard to belive sosuave will have you believe every girl out here is trying to date Chad/Tyrone or even getting ****ed down. However my limited real world anecdotal data would disagree.
I don’t know what that is.
Many men think sex is like pron, many women think dating is like instagram.
Murphy Brown aired from 1988 - 1998. I was in kindergarten through 9th grade while the show aired and never watched an episode.I remember that statement. I think the Murphy Brown character - i.e., VERY successful female professional - is really too small of cohort to make a difference. Most professional women aren't like that, and would want marry to get the full family - with the problem being their hypergamy.
What made Quayle's statement so off-point is that Murphy Brown's specific situation - i.e., very wealthy, and with lots of male platonic friends (not necessarily orbiters) - was not generating problems for society, and that her situation was far removed from that of poor single mothers, something that Republicans weren't very interested in helping.
Men on SoSuave want relationships for the convenience factor. Even if a man doesn't want to get married or have children, a committed relationship does help a man with getting sex. The man doesn't have to hunt as much for sex if he keeps a committed relationship.
I was an adult when it aired, and I didn't watch it either. I think it was the first cultural touchstone show showcasing the urban elite, where the women were bossbabes, and the men were light in the loafers. It was also not long after cable TV became a thing, and so the big, conventional networks did not have to go for a mainstream audience, and instead went for an audience that they could sell to their advertising customers - and if there is one thing that barren feminists and girly men do, it's spending on frivolous, high mark-up stuff. I think this is the reason why conventional network TV became so coastal urban - this can be contrasted with the country-hick shows that were popular in the '60s (e.g., Beverly Hillbillies, Green Acres, Andy Griffith, Petticoat Junction, Hee-Haw), a show trope that continued on with the Nashville Network or County Music Television, etc. The wildly popular show "Dallas" was a bit of country-hicks as elite.
I wouldn't go to Appleby's and the like, but rather a few locally owned restaurants that had a similarly priced menu. I guess I was doing this in the USA at a time when women didn't "professionally date", so I would only get an affirmative with a gal that was at least somewhat interested in me - and in Eastern Europe thereafter, and it was hard to find an expensive place to eat.
I see no other reason for commitment other than child raising and/or mutual, serious life goals. All else is playing house.
I would add an other side of convenience which is someone that can handle the grocery shopping and minor house chores or give you company and some help here and there.
It provides a sense of stability for his sex life. It provides a regular connection. It frees him up to do things that are more productive than chasing women.
I think both of you are right if we take into consideration that most modern women are not ltr/marriage worthy but there are still some needles in a haystack out there.
I agree, I see it both ways as well. There was a time in my life that I changed out women every 2-4 months. It was fun and sex, with no committment. It got really old too, it was also a lot of work keeping the pump primed with fresh talent. Its also pretty shallow.
