An example of what immigration brings
- Thread starter Stagger Lee
- Start date
( . )( . )
Banned
Uh oh not the "cry some moar" burn!!
Projection? Stating some home truths is hardly "crying" gaylan. Are you running out of sh!t to say?Jaylan said:
Stagger Lee
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2009
- Messages
- 2,168
- Reaction score
- 138
Yeah like even 1860 America it was multicultural. Cry moar. 2014 Ferguson cry moar. Meanie frat boys. Cry cry.Jaylan said:
It doesn't sound like you really like multiculturalism with all your crying.
You know how I relax after work during the week? A relaxing glass of white whine while catching up on the news.
On the weekends though, I get ready to party and grab my favorite liquor. Work hard, play hard.
Carry on gents.
On the weekends though, I get ready to party and grab my favorite liquor. Work hard, play hard.
Carry on gents.
I know, Im such a real racist for mocking race trolls on Sosuave. Meanwhile Danger has nothing to say about the continual anti-minority posts on this forum. Fvking hilarious bullsh!te right there. One can defend their tribe without the hyperbolic and usually outright obvious anti-minority rhetoric that is constantly posted here.
Yet when someone steps in to counter this consistent flow of racial crap, theyre the racists? lololol. Yeah, how dare Jaylan and others speak out against or mock those who constantly belittle, ridicule, and bash non-whites and non-right wingers.
Yet when someone steps in to counter this consistent flow of racial crap, theyre the racists? lololol. Yeah, how dare Jaylan and others speak out against or mock those who constantly belittle, ridicule, and bash non-whites and non-right wingers.
You do realize there were tens of thousands (millions?) or Africans and Indians in the United States at the time or it's founding. And that a good portion of the land that became the United States had tens (hundreds?) of thousands of Mexicans living in it right? That's the very definition of multicultural and America has always been multicultural and that's been it's strength.( . )( . ) said:No it wasn't. It was predominantly Europeans all of whom shared similar IQ's and K-selected life ideologies as the host populace. Was nothing like this atomized multi-kulti poz we have today, wouldn't even have been possible to build and sustain a leading higher civilization if it was. Stop BSing.
Btw a lot of Americans enjoy different countries and cultures. It used to be called travelling. On the plus side I'm glad we've proved you don't "love your country" and now we're up to you "liking" it ....If we just had a few more non-whites of course.
And your argument about "love" vs. "like" is the kind my daughter would've had with me a couple years ago when she was 7.
( . )( . )
Banned
And yet you seem to be struggling to grasp that it was still 90% white just 70 odd years ago. It wasn't the same disconnected multi-kult dystopia we see today no matter how hard you wish it was.FairShake said:
Ironically says the dude who was just caught out in a lie. "I love my country"....except not really because it's still too whiteFairShake said:
http://imgur.com/LnY2QJHJaylan said:
Stagger Lee
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2009
- Messages
- 2,168
- Reaction score
- 138
Absolutely not. There were ZERO blacks when the Colony was started. There was a peak percentage ~19% of black population in 1790 (700,000), but they were mostly in the south. No one denies the US has always been about 15% black, but multiculturalism is a 1960's and onward policy. There were a few thousand Amerindians but they were living in completely separate nations and were at war. There were no Mexicans to speak of, only a few thousand subjects of Spain during the time in parts of the southwest. Everything you've said is incorrect and meaningless. You need to read about the demographics from 1600-1960, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Historical_racial_and_ethnic_demographics_of_the_United_States#White_.28non-Hispanic.29.FairShake said:
Kupid Diggs
Don Juan
All I'm getting out of this post, is white guys are mad because they can't talk ****, beat, mistreat, or kill minorities like they used to do back in the day. Poor guys... Cry me a river, better yet here's a straw, go suck it up.
Bible_Belt
Master Don Juan
What's the cause of action here? I just don't see it. I don't see any grounds to sue that has any chance of winning. Even if they are trying to fight a PR battle, they're only digging a deeper hole for themselves.dasein said:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/03/...-to-sue-university-and-president-david-boren/
SAE’s Oklahoma chapter — angry at being ‘tarred and feathered’ — plans to sue university
Stagger Lee
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2009
- Messages
- 2,168
- Reaction score
- 138
I'm not the lawyer but constitutional law experts say the cause to action is OU is a state actor and cannot infringe or impose consequences on free speech per the 1st amendment except for very specific and narrow exceptions. The Supreme Court and other courts have ruled that previously. Also due process rights and equal protection are being violated.Bible_Belt said:
Universities with their PC rules have infringed on free speech and thought in the biological sciences, psychology, social sciences, political sciences etc and students and certain student groups and speakers for too long as it is.
Poonani Maker
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2007
- Messages
- 4,417
- Reaction score
- 929
Mount Ararat is at the edge of the Black Sea, way the hell away from the Holy Land of Palestine, where most of the Bible did NOT take place. Mount Ararat is exactly where a boat would have ended up which was escaping from the flood that created the Black Sea.
There are several theories, as usual, of how the flood looked. We know for sure that about seven thousand years ago there was a tiny bridge of land where Istanbul now sits, and that piece of land protected the fresh water inland sea where the Black Sea now sits, as well as a huge amount of dry land.
So when the sea level rose and Mediterranean water came over into the lake and onto the land, people there had to move fast. They had to become used to steady movement into new lands, year after year after year. They developed a people which adapted or died.
C.D. Darlington, F.R.S. and Oxford geneticist, pointed out that Americans became blonder as they moved West. That fact has been ignored, but never disputed.
So the people who adapted or died had to conquer new lands all the time. It became part of their heritage.
And they KEPT moving.
The ancestors of today’s Americans began their westward trek many, many years ago. But today’s historian has almost no interest in most of that westward movement, the part that took place before they crossed the Atlantic into America. Few of today’s Americans are aware that most of the real and historical “Wagons West!” saga ever took place.
For thousands of years, the ancestors of today’s white Americans traveled from the ancient Indo-European homeland somewhere far to the east of Poland. They migrated steadily west and south from there. Our Indo-European ancestors moved steadily westward into Europe.
Only after they had been in Western Europe for many, many centuries did a part of this Indo-European people go on to settle America.
Americans who arrived on these shores over a century and a half ago would not have recognized ancient Roman or Egyptian or Grecian housing and clothing. But the homes of the Germanic and Celtic “barbarians” would have looked very familiar indeed.
The “barbarians’” clothing was not the togas or robes of Greece or Rome, much less that of Egypt. They wore shirts and pants. An old Celtic outfit looks like a suit of primitive but very recognizable Western clothing.
But our children are taught that THEIR ancestors had no history. History comes from Egypt, up through Greece and Rome, and on to our brutish, scarcely human ancestors in Northern Europe.
Back in the real world, real Western history goes back to a westward trek our American ancestors would have readily recognized.
We have no idea when the first wagon set out.
We do know that the first wagon journey that led to to today’s America was at least four thousand years ago. Some of our ancestors were probably called “Scythians” in the ancient Middle East. They brought the wheel to Egypt. Before them, the Egyptians had no wheel. Egypt had no iron until another group of people rolled south, an Indo-European group called the Hittites, and brought it with them. In fact, there is no real evidence that the Egyptians’ rigid, priest-ridden, pyramidal society ever INVENTED anything.
Egyptian history is filled with these northern invasions. Greek history is also a series of northern invasions. Then Roman history becomes a series of northern invasions. In fact, the Italic tribes, some of whom became Romans themselves, were almost certainly northern invaders into the Italian peninsula before history takes note of them.
But the people who rolled into Egypt and into Greece and into Rome were not only from the north, but from the northeast as well. They rolled into Iran about two thousand years Before Christ and the name “Iran” — as you probably know — means “Aryan.” Aryan is also the word those who invaded India from the north and set up the caste system called themselves.
“Caste” is a Portuguese word. The old Indian word for caste is “varna,” which means “color.”
All of these groups were part of the great movement of the same people, the people the ancients called “Scythians” and “barbarians.” Other branches of this same westward drive ended up in America and bred you and me.
Ireland was named “Erin” by the Celts for exactly the same reason that “Iran” and the Indian “Aryans” got their names. Erin, Iran, Aryan — they are all the same name. One of the great linguistic discoveries of the nineteenth century was that many words from ancient Persian and ancient Indian, or Sanskrit, are almost exactly the same as the same words in English, Old Irish (Gaelic), German, Greek, Latin, Russian and all the languages related to them.
And what is the excuse for this total perversion of history? It is the same one that pops up everywhere else in our perverted society: Hitler talked about Aryans, so anybody who traces their history this way is anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
There are several theories, as usual, of how the flood looked. We know for sure that about seven thousand years ago there was a tiny bridge of land where Istanbul now sits, and that piece of land protected the fresh water inland sea where the Black Sea now sits, as well as a huge amount of dry land.
So when the sea level rose and Mediterranean water came over into the lake and onto the land, people there had to move fast. They had to become used to steady movement into new lands, year after year after year. They developed a people which adapted or died.
C.D. Darlington, F.R.S. and Oxford geneticist, pointed out that Americans became blonder as they moved West. That fact has been ignored, but never disputed.
So the people who adapted or died had to conquer new lands all the time. It became part of their heritage.
And they KEPT moving.
The ancestors of today’s Americans began their westward trek many, many years ago. But today’s historian has almost no interest in most of that westward movement, the part that took place before they crossed the Atlantic into America. Few of today’s Americans are aware that most of the real and historical “Wagons West!” saga ever took place.
For thousands of years, the ancestors of today’s white Americans traveled from the ancient Indo-European homeland somewhere far to the east of Poland. They migrated steadily west and south from there. Our Indo-European ancestors moved steadily westward into Europe.
Only after they had been in Western Europe for many, many centuries did a part of this Indo-European people go on to settle America.
Americans who arrived on these shores over a century and a half ago would not have recognized ancient Roman or Egyptian or Grecian housing and clothing. But the homes of the Germanic and Celtic “barbarians” would have looked very familiar indeed.
The “barbarians’” clothing was not the togas or robes of Greece or Rome, much less that of Egypt. They wore shirts and pants. An old Celtic outfit looks like a suit of primitive but very recognizable Western clothing.
But our children are taught that THEIR ancestors had no history. History comes from Egypt, up through Greece and Rome, and on to our brutish, scarcely human ancestors in Northern Europe.
Back in the real world, real Western history goes back to a westward trek our American ancestors would have readily recognized.
We have no idea when the first wagon set out.
We do know that the first wagon journey that led to to today’s America was at least four thousand years ago. Some of our ancestors were probably called “Scythians” in the ancient Middle East. They brought the wheel to Egypt. Before them, the Egyptians had no wheel. Egypt had no iron until another group of people rolled south, an Indo-European group called the Hittites, and brought it with them. In fact, there is no real evidence that the Egyptians’ rigid, priest-ridden, pyramidal society ever INVENTED anything.
Egyptian history is filled with these northern invasions. Greek history is also a series of northern invasions. Then Roman history becomes a series of northern invasions. In fact, the Italic tribes, some of whom became Romans themselves, were almost certainly northern invaders into the Italian peninsula before history takes note of them.
But the people who rolled into Egypt and into Greece and into Rome were not only from the north, but from the northeast as well. They rolled into Iran about two thousand years Before Christ and the name “Iran” — as you probably know — means “Aryan.” Aryan is also the word those who invaded India from the north and set up the caste system called themselves.
“Caste” is a Portuguese word. The old Indian word for caste is “varna,” which means “color.”
All of these groups were part of the great movement of the same people, the people the ancients called “Scythians” and “barbarians.” Other branches of this same westward drive ended up in America and bred you and me.
Ireland was named “Erin” by the Celts for exactly the same reason that “Iran” and the Indian “Aryans” got their names. Erin, Iran, Aryan — they are all the same name. One of the great linguistic discoveries of the nineteenth century was that many words from ancient Persian and ancient Indian, or Sanskrit, are almost exactly the same as the same words in English, Old Irish (Gaelic), German, Greek, Latin, Russian and all the languages related to them.
And what is the excuse for this total perversion of history? It is the same one that pops up everywhere else in our perverted society: Hitler talked about Aryans, so anybody who traces their history this way is anaziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
The simplest answer is, ironically, 42 USC S. 1983 under the Ku Klux Klan Act. I suspect that SAE will be seeking primarily injunctive relief, and individual students could likely seek monetary damages. Also read the case I linked earlier seeking injunctive relief.Bible_Belt said:
http://lawbrain.com/wiki/Section_1983
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enforcement_Act_of_1871_(third_act)
"Every person who under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, Suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia."
Due Process
http://www.federalpracticemanual.org/node/57
Just for information purposes, against feds, Bivens and limitations on it; possible implied cause of action 5.2.B
http://www.federalpracticemanual.org/node/30
Still feds, Old law review article, have not shepardized
http://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1734&context=vulr
Stagger Lee
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2009
- Messages
- 2,168
- Reaction score
- 138
Meanwhile in Jaylan's multicultural paradise of NY:
A young, white couple were walking down the street around 2:00 am in Queens, when a Latino couple crossed the street and got behind them. Then the male Latino yelled “I’m going to kill you white boy,” in Spanish, and attacked the 24-year old white male victim from behind.
He slashed the victim's throat and then ran off.
It's all good though, since the victim was white this time.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/man-slashed-throat-apparent-hate-crime-queens-article-1.2148582
A young, white couple were walking down the street around 2:00 am in Queens, when a Latino couple crossed the street and got behind them. Then the male Latino yelled “I’m going to kill you white boy,” in Spanish, and attacked the 24-year old white male victim from behind.
He slashed the victim's throat and then ran off.
It's all good though, since the victim was white this time.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/man-slashed-throat-apparent-hate-crime-queens-article-1.2148582
speed dawg
Master Don Juan
If this white guy had been carrying a gun, there would be one less 3rd world thug to deal with. I'm starting to think that's the best way to deal with this stuff. The cops will never find the guy.Stagger Lee said:
Shame the "thug" harmed some innocent people. Itd be better if guys like him targeted fellow worthless people, namely the big mouth e-racists that are so brave online. But of course you cannot target those who are so cowardly and quiet in the real world.
Anyways, I love how you guys think this criminal stands for anything but his own fvked up world view.
EDIT - And as someone familiar with Ridgewood Queens, there are thugs of all backgrounds. When I was in high school there was a gang roaming around called ABI, Albanian Boys Incorporated. And ABI beefed with everyone. So quit your race bullsh!t.
Anyways, I love how you guys think this criminal stands for anything but his own fvked up world view.
EDIT - And as someone familiar with Ridgewood Queens, there are thugs of all backgrounds. When I was in high school there was a gang roaming around called ABI, Albanian Boys Incorporated. And ABI beefed with everyone. So quit your race bullsh!t.
Stagger Lee
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2009
- Messages
- 2,168
- Reaction score
- 138
That's been my point. Now you admit it. Multiculturalism leads to thugs and gangs of all backgrounds. Albanians just like latinos are both still ethnic groups and are not really traditional immigrants.Jaylan said:
This is not just some equal opportunity thug. Even the police are calling this a random racial hate crime. You know how rare the police will say that when a white is attacked?
True. I bet it's hard to get concealed handgun permit in NYC though. I'm not sure what the authorities there do to you if you defend yourself with hand gun without a CC permit, probably about as bad as death. It's a pain carrying a gun all the time and you need eyes in the back of your head. According to liberals multiculturalism+gun control=win :cheer:.speed dawg said:
( . )( . )
Banned
If my passive aggressive poopy-talk translator is working correctly I think what gaylan is trying to say is he's wishing ill will toward dudes who dare to quote crime statistics.Jaylan said:
Crime stats be rayciss.
Multiculturalism leads to thugs? No thats stupidity right there. What leads to thugs is poverty and lack of a good upbringing. You wont find a gang of street toughs largely compiled of middle or upper class folks.
Ridgewood is an area of Queens with a good portion of families without significant amounts of disposable income.
Ridgewood is an area of Queens with a good portion of families without significant amounts of disposable income.
Nah, Im saying that I know for a fact that big talkers online are quiet in real life...and that internet big mouths tend to sh!t breaks in tough real life situations.b!tch tits said: