A
AJ84
Guest
So like more of a general gauge of interest, like by date three there should be some indication that she’s into you sexually at the very least? Yeah I can see wanting to know by the third date, that’s there’s chemistry and some action that implies sex very soon. But I guess even then there’s no guarantee. I can see how the only guarantee of sex is when it’s actually happening lol so I get why a guy would want to move towards that sooner rather than later.do you ladies believe that sosuave is a hivemind or just one guy with a bunch of sock accounts or....?
there's guys on here who think sex means little, there's guys on here who think sex is everything, there's guys on here who think a girl who fvcks them is a slvt. there's guys on here who think a girl who doesn't fvck them is a wannabe nun
but like, most of the time these aren't the same guys. or they're guys with a reasonable middle ground like "sucking me off in the bathroom of a club is a little too hoe-ish, but I don't wanna wait til I'm engaged either"
idiots who think that a girl has to fvck them precisely on date 3 (any earlier she's a slvt, any later she's a game playing prude) are very rare.
it's like how there's a three episode test for anime (japanese cartoons). it doesn't mean that any anime that is good will be good by episode 3, or that it cannot get bad in episode 4 from a good start, neither of those scenarios are uncommon.
it means that on average, you'll figure out if you'll like most shows by episode 3, and anything that takes longer is an exception or a minority, rather than the rule. you're taking a few acceptable losses to save time and energy because it's better than watching 2 dozen shows every 3 months and only liking half of them.
in the same vein, the idea behind the 3 date rule is that it is thought, most of the time waiting longer than that isn't worth the investment for the guy in question and it's almost guaranteed that he would have a better time trying to get another girl instead. like how they say you shouldn't try to chase an uninterested girl and change her mind, but rather you should find one who likes you in the first place to avoid the sunk cost fallacy.
obviously there are girls who would be fantastic if you only waited on their leisure for sex, but the idea is that it's supposed to be far more likely that waiting longer than 3 dates would bear no useful fruit, if not then the rule needs to be updated to the 5-6 date rule or whatever.
I like how you don't seem to realize that taking pride in being an unconquered fortress is the exact same thing as a guy taking pride in uniting the world under his glorious banner.
women: Morior Invictus
men: Veni, Vidi, Vici
it's the same thing, it's cognitive dissonance to claim otherwise.
But alot of women are running an opposite strategy of waiting longer so that they are not seen or treated like a sl*t. I have gone on dates with a guy I was definitely very attracted to and wanted to sleep with right away but held off for the above reasons. I did however progress physical stuff on date three and date four then date five it happened. But if I didn’t progress anything and kept having platonic dates he would of dropped off, understandably.