The Misandry Bubble article

[PeasantPlayer]

If you have ADHD skip to The Primal Man and women

Why does it seem that American society is in decline, that fairness and decorum are receding, that socialism and tyranny are becoming malignant despite the majority of the public being averse to such philosophies, yet the true root cause seems elusive? What if everything from unsustainable health care and social security costs, to stagnant wages and rising crime, to crumbling infrastructure and metastasizing socialism, to the economic decline of major US cities like Detroit, Cleveland, Pittsburgh, and Baltimore, could all be traced to a common origin that is extremely pervasive yet is all but absent from the national dialog, indeed from the dialog of the entire Western world?

http://www.singularity2050.com/2010/01/the-misandry-bubble.html

 

[Greasy Pig]

I'll have to read it in instalments but what I've read so far is very, very good.

 

[JoeMarron]

I remember my mind being blown after reading this and was planning to make a post but it slipped my mind. It's interesting that he thinks it'll come to and end by 2020. That's a big difference from the opinion of many dudes who claim that we're screwed and will suffer under feminism for generations to come.

 

[Wolfgang D]

Thank you, Peasant! I read this one about two weeks ago but couldn't find it again. I thought I had read it on the-spearhead.com, so I kept looking there.

This is an excellent article on feminism and psychology and real facts, should be mandatory reading in schools. Lots of thought-worthy material.

For example, this part:

The Primal Nature of Men and Women : Genetic research has shown that before the modern era, 80% of women managed to reproduce, but only 40% of men did. The obvious conclusion from this is that a few top men had multiple wives, while the bottom 60% had no mating prospects at all. Women clearly did not mind sharing the top man with multiple other women, ultimately deciding that being one of four women sharing an 'alpha' was still more preferable than having the undivided attention of a 'beta'. Let us define the top 20% of men as measured by their attractiveness to women, as 'alpha' males while the middle 60% of men will be called 'beta' males. The bottom 20% are not meaningful in this context.

.......

To provide 'beta' men an incentive to produce far more economic output than needed just to support themselves while simultaneously controlling the hypergamy of women that would deprive children of interaction with their biological fathers, all major religions constructed an institution to force constructive conduct out of both genders while penalizing the natural primate tendencies of each. This institution was known as 'marriage'. Societies that enforced monogamous marriage made sure all beta men had wives, thus unlocking productive output out of these men who in pre-modern times would have had no incentive to be productive. Women, in turn, received a provider, a protector, and higher social status than unmarried women, who often were trapped in poverty. When applied over an entire population of humans, this system was known as 'civilization'.

All societies that achieved great advances and lasted for multiple centuries followed this formula with very little deviation, and it is quite remarkable how similar the nature of monogamous marriage was across seemingly diverse cultures. ....... So what happens when the traditional controls of civilization are lifted from both men and women?

In an 'at will' employment arrangement between a corporation and an employee, either party can terminate the contract at any time. However, instead of a few weeks of severance, imagine what would happen if the employer was legally required to pay the employee half of his or her paycheck for 20 additional years, irrespective of anything the employee did or did not do, under penalty of imprisonment for the CEO. Suppose, additionally, that it is culturally encouraged for an employee to do this whenever even minor dissatisfaction arises. Would businesses be able to operate? Would anyone want to be a CEO? Would businesses even form, and thus would any wealth be created, given the risks associated with hiring an employee? Keep these questions in mind as you read further.

So why are 70-90% of divorces initiated by women (she files 70% of the time, and the other 20% of the time, she forces the man to file, due to abuse or adultery on the part of the woman)? Women have always been hypergamous, and most were married to beta men that they felt no attraction towards, so what has changed to cause an increase in divorce rates?

 

[PlayHer Man]

I read this a while back. The Misandry Bubble article is very good.

Even as a DJ who does well with women, you must admit there is little motivation to be a father and husband these days. Younger men are increasingly choosing to stay single. Its just easier than taking care of untrustworthy and ungrateful women.

Also, men can get sex with less investment. The women who require high investment on the male's part often get passed over by quality men because they are too "high maintenance".

So the traditional women end up with wimpy betas who they eventually cheat on because they have no attraction for them. The top men don't commit because all the women are chasing them.. so why bother? :crackup: :crackup:

In the end.. women will suffer.. A LOT.

The world really NEEDS men as providers, protectors, husbands and fathers... problem is --> The world doesn't want to reward men for doing these things. Men should just "do them" because its their job. That doesn't fly these days with most men.. so they are choosing instead to stay single and go their own way.

Its a gradual but CONSISTENT shift. 2020 is likely when the shift will be noticeable enough to have serious ramifications on women's quality of life. We'll see....