Hello Friend,

If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.

It will be the most efficient use of your time.

And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.

Thank you for visiting and have a great day!

Student tells professor of sex class that women get b1tchy when thry dont get d1ck

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
17,936
Reaction score
12,147
Location
DFW, TX

She called him "misogynistic". Most of our observations is women that go prolonged time without sex are quicker to anger and bitchier. When they are back to regular sex they are nicer and alot more relaxed.
 

Who Dares Win

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
7,545
Reaction score
5,897
That would explain a lot.

In my opinion they get angry and b1tchy when they dont get laid while they get sad and depressed when they dont get validated.

Which is why an armed terrorist is usually more reasonable than the everyday karen, thankfully karen has no other means than her ability to lie.
 

Lucky666Dice

Don Juan
Joined
Sep 9, 2020
Messages
18
Reaction score
13
Age
29
I find that hypothesis right.

In my native language there is that saying, which in translation to English goes like this:

"A woman that does not get a d!ck, quickly becomes a prick."
 

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,626
Reaction score
8,602
Age
34
That would explain a lot.

In my opinion they get angry and b1tchy when they dont get laid while they get sad and depressed when they dont get validated.
This is true.

Which is why an armed terrorist is usually more reasonable than the everyday karen, thankfully karen has no other means than her ability to lie.
Bruh.

As entitled as Karen is, we haven’t seen too many of them blowing up buildings or shooting up schools. There’s no need for the rhetoric.
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
17,936
Reaction score
12,147
Location
DFW, TX
That would explain a lot.

In my opinion they get angry and b1tchy when they dont get laid while they get sad and depressed when they dont get validated.

Which is why an armed terrorist is usually more reasonable than the everyday karen, thankfully karen has no other means than her ability to lie.
Even if they go without d1ck intentionally we know they are worse azz holes and more judgemental without c0ck. So I dont give a darn about this professors straight up lies to protect her political view. Even she knows that kid was right.
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
17,936
Reaction score
12,147
Location
DFW, TX
This is true.



Bruh.

As entitled as Karen is, we haven’t seen too many of them blowing up buildings or shooting up schools. There’s no need for the rhetoric.
Karen lust and orgasmic explosion is when she's successful at fvcking a man over.
 

Who Dares Win

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
7,545
Reaction score
5,897
This is true.



Bruh.

As entitled as Karen is, we haven’t seen too many of them blowing up buildings or shooting up schools. There’s no need for the rhetoric.
Karens gets innocent men jailed to have a promotion or to "get even" when they dont bow down, the only reason they dont shoot people is because they lack the emotional and technical skills and tools to do so.

The most bad ass of the navy seals would not shoot an hurt men with no guns sitting and bleeding on the ground, karens would finish him to settle a divorce and lie about it to their own kids keep that in mind, we have plenty of episodes like that.
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
17,936
Reaction score
12,147
Location
DFW, TX
This is true.



Bruh.

As entitled as Karen is, we haven’t seen too many of them blowing up buildings or shooting up schools. There’s no need for the rhetoric.
They get their random release fvcking men over
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
17,936
Reaction score
12,147
Location
DFW, TX
I agree with that. However, it was an exceptionally stupid comment to say that armed terrorists are more reasonable.
The reason they dont get to enough rage to cause mass destruction is theirs billions of males to screw over. Plus a society and system which enables it and looks the other way.
 

Who Dares Win

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
7,545
Reaction score
5,897
I agree with that. However, it was an exceptionally stupid comment to say that armed terrorists are more reasonable.
Am armed terrorist aims to money, tv broadcasts, political goals or conditions that can be negotiated to limit damages while over emotional people with no aim or goals lead from their feelings are not REASONSABLE.

Ask any police officer and he will confirm that a terrorist holding hostages is much better to deal with than someone that has no control over his emotions and feelings and could harm innocent for no reason beside his emotioanal state without any reasoning or logic.

But hey feel free to disagree, if you believe an angry kid with a pistol shouting and throwing a tantrum is less dangerous than a cold calm criminal that weights pros and cons its fine to me, we had similar convos before.

The reason they dont get to enough rage to cause mass destruction is theirs billions of males to screw over. Plus a society and system which enables it and looks the other way.
He cant tell the difference between threat and risk, between means and intention.
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
17,936
Reaction score
12,147
Location
DFW, TX
Am armed terrorist aims to money, tv broadcasts, political goals or conditions that can be negotiated to limit damages while over emotional people with no aim or goals lead from their feelings are not REASONSABLE.

Ask any police officer and he will confirm that a terrorist holding hostages is much better to deal with than someone that has no control over his emotions and feelings and could harm innocent for no reason beside his emotioanal state without any reasoning or logic.

But hey feel free to disagree, if you believe an angry kid with a pistol shouting and throwing a tantrum is less dangerous than a cold calm criminal that weights pros and cons its fine to me, we had similar convos before.


He cant tell the difference between threat and risk, between means and intention.
I was talking about why women don't build up to that point of wanting to terrorize large groups. They are able to inflict pain at will to men to make themselves "feel" better, or to absolve themselves of those feelings. They never build up to a point of rage where they want to hurt a large grouping of people.

Alot ( not all ) of the "mass" killings had an initiative, to make a statement. Alot of it was political or oriented to one group making a statement to another.
 

Who Dares Win

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
7,545
Reaction score
5,897
I was talking about why women don't build up to that point of wanting to terrorize large groups. They are able to inflict pain at will to men to make themselves "feel" better, or to absolve themselves of those feelings. They never build up to a point of rage where they want to hurt a large grouping of people.

Alot ( not all ) of the "mass" killings had an initiative, to make a statement. Alot of it was political or oriented to one group making a statement to another.
The difference between the two is reason and being able to abstract thinking, terrorists do while angry women dont, you have a good point about the build up factor, thats true.

Also the build up is related to principles and not only the "personal" side, its a sum of both.
 

Bible_Belt

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
17,021
Reaction score
5,605
Age
48
Location
midwestern cow field 40
There was a doctor in the 90s who published research that concluded women have much more stable hormones if they were having unprotected sex. He worked at a large hospital in nyc. Feminists started picketing and harassing him, because he dared to imply that women needed men. The poor guy never really understood why the feminists were after him, and he quickly retired to save his workplace the embarrassment.
 

Lynx nkaf

Banned
Joined
Nov 17, 2019
Messages
1,890
Reaction score
1,234
There was a doctor in the 90s who published research that concluded women have much more stable hormones if they were having unprotected sex. He worked at a large hospital in nyc. Feminists started picketing and harassing him, because he dared to imply that women needed men. The poor guy never really understood why the feminists were after him, and he quickly retired to save his workplace the embarrassment.
I remember this. It's true though.
 
Top