countermart
Don Juan
Ref: Do women only love you for what you can do for them?
I totally get the cave person youth, provisioning dynamic, but so what. We are not just base animals, we should by now have a sense of right and wrong. Most of us don’t go around clubbing people to death because we don’t like them. There are laws to stop this. We do have reason, and some type of concept of equity.
Although I’ll admit I don’t see much of either in some divorce courts.
But let’s take my $30 million “sweetheart”. It was obvious that she was out to get the guy’s money from the start. The moment she showed me the large diamond ring on her finger I knew the guy was doomed. It was only a matter of time.
The real point is intent.
My sexy “friend” knew exactly what she was doing. She was going to marry the guy, hang around for a few years, divorce him and come away with a lot of money. That was her intent.
Outside marriage in any other undertaking such intent is fraud/theft. Because of intent this is nothing but robbery, straight out theft.
Society entirely accepts this type of (mostly) female fraud.
There is absolutely nothing illegal about marrying a guy with the intent to rip off his money in a few years.
Which brings me to the divorce industry.
The divorce industry is big business, worth billions in legal billing every year.
The marriage-divorce industry is strongly supported by society, with government and religion pushing people towards marriage, and a protected legal system crunching money out of people when it ends badly in 50% of cases.
If society wanted to prevent this fraud commonly perpetrated by women against men to access their resources then it needs to do one thing and one thing only.
Society should make prenuptial and cohabitation/binding agreements compulsory.
Let’s end the rip off, and let the deal be done at the start.
Society has many types of financial laws to protect people from fraud, including compliance, statements of advice, and disclosure requirements.
It has these laws in place to protect people commonly from themselves.
It is not sufficient that the prenuptial option simply exists as a choice.
Society does nothing to prevent or reduce what amounts to marriage or cohabitation fraud.
If the Manosphere wants to achieve anything useful then it should be pushing for compulsory marriage and cohabitation/binding agreements via a change in government policies.
Just this change alone would go a long way to destroying a big part of the legal billing in divorce courts.
Why are many governments allowing the continuance of a system that takes billions off already stressed and broken families every year?
To be binding prenups must have independent legal advice for both parties to demonstrate understanding before signing. Then they will generally stand up in court - However, consult your lawyer first for independent legal advice on your specific situation and local laws.
Taking the money side out of divorce proceedings would leave mostly just child issues to be dealt with and also save millions for governments in court provision costs.
But watch the divorce industry and feminists bleat!
I totally get the cave person youth, provisioning dynamic, but so what. We are not just base animals, we should by now have a sense of right and wrong. Most of us don’t go around clubbing people to death because we don’t like them. There are laws to stop this. We do have reason, and some type of concept of equity.
Although I’ll admit I don’t see much of either in some divorce courts.
But let’s take my $30 million “sweetheart”. It was obvious that she was out to get the guy’s money from the start. The moment she showed me the large diamond ring on her finger I knew the guy was doomed. It was only a matter of time.
The real point is intent.
My sexy “friend” knew exactly what she was doing. She was going to marry the guy, hang around for a few years, divorce him and come away with a lot of money. That was her intent.
Outside marriage in any other undertaking such intent is fraud/theft. Because of intent this is nothing but robbery, straight out theft.
Society entirely accepts this type of (mostly) female fraud.
There is absolutely nothing illegal about marrying a guy with the intent to rip off his money in a few years.
Which brings me to the divorce industry.
The divorce industry is big business, worth billions in legal billing every year.
The marriage-divorce industry is strongly supported by society, with government and religion pushing people towards marriage, and a protected legal system crunching money out of people when it ends badly in 50% of cases.
If society wanted to prevent this fraud commonly perpetrated by women against men to access their resources then it needs to do one thing and one thing only.
Society should make prenuptial and cohabitation/binding agreements compulsory.
Let’s end the rip off, and let the deal be done at the start.
Society has many types of financial laws to protect people from fraud, including compliance, statements of advice, and disclosure requirements.
It has these laws in place to protect people commonly from themselves.
It is not sufficient that the prenuptial option simply exists as a choice.
Society does nothing to prevent or reduce what amounts to marriage or cohabitation fraud.
If the Manosphere wants to achieve anything useful then it should be pushing for compulsory marriage and cohabitation/binding agreements via a change in government policies.
Just this change alone would go a long way to destroying a big part of the legal billing in divorce courts.
Why are many governments allowing the continuance of a system that takes billions off already stressed and broken families every year?
To be binding prenups must have independent legal advice for both parties to demonstrate understanding before signing. Then they will generally stand up in court - However, consult your lawyer first for independent legal advice on your specific situation and local laws.
Taking the money side out of divorce proceedings would leave mostly just child issues to be dealt with and also save millions for governments in court provision costs.
But watch the divorce industry and feminists bleat!
