“The 22 Rules That Flip the Script With Women… And How You Can Use Them Tonight”

Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.

Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers.  Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.

I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.

Read more...

My % on ugly, average, attractive, hot is accurate!!

mahon83050

Banned
Joined
Jun 16, 2000
Messages
2,641
Reaction score
6
Location
Toms River,NJ United States
For those of you remember my previous post about people aged 18-35 or so belonging to 1 of 4 looks categories, that was CLOSED.

http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=125439&highlight=category


Since I tend to HAVE ALOT OF TIME on my hands, I wanted to test to see of what I previously proclaimed was somewhat accurate. I looked at SENIOR high school pictures from various yearbooks that I have from the early to mid 90's. I chose SENIORS ONLY because they had the only color pictures. I counted the # of women in the graduating class and then counted the # of women that would be considered attractive (based on the rules of facial balance and facial symmetry) There was no biased here, I simply looked at EVERY CAUCASIAN woman's face and judged it as attractive based on symmetry and ruled out biases and preferences such as hair style, hair color, eye color etc. AND PLEASE DON'T TELL ME LOOKS ARE SUBJECTIVE. They are subjective to an extent (height, hair color, hair style, boobs, eye color, etc). I am TALKING ABOUT THE SCIENCE OF FACIAL SYMMETRY. Cosmetic Surgeons, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons and Orthodontists follow this formula and try to achieve harmony and balance in each patient.

Some of you may say, SURE MAHON, YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. Then I would say, how many guys would find a woman with a gummy file and hook nose more attractive than a woman with a nice smile and straight nose? Not many.......

ANYWAYS.....

After looking at about 5-6 different SENIOR graduating classes pics of WOMEN ONLY (each class had about 200 women), I found the SAME CLOSE results EVERY TIME. The Percentage of attractive women was usually anywhere from 37% to 45% or so. Out of these attractive women, only about 5% were extremely good looking where the rest were cute/attractive. So the AVERAGE LOOKING PEOPLE (neither attractive nor ugly) were the MAJORITY at around 55%-60% and UGLY WOMEN AT ABOUT 5%.

However, Most people are slightly better looking in person so it is best to say, the attractive to average/unattractive ratio is about 50/50.

EVERY MAN WANTS AN ATTRACTIVE LOOKING WOMAN (PERSONALITY EXCLUDED).

GOOD NEWS: For those who are still UNDER 35, there are plenty of attractive looking woman around.

BAD NEWS: For every attractive woman, there is one that is not attractive and sometimes a little more. As we all know, there ARE NOT ENOUGH Attractive looking women to go around for everybody, so THERE IS IMMENSE competition for attractive women.

ON A SIDE NOTE: I think this scale is accurate for North America where we have women whose ancentry includes every country in Europe. THe Countries in Scandinavia, Eastern Europe and some Latin American countries probably have a higher percentage of attractive women than North America.

The United Kingdom and the Middle East are probably in worse shape than North America.


AND PLEASE...I have OCD where I am always thinking about something and will beat the topic to death and become obsessed with it...hence my certain hangups on certain topics.
 

What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.

You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

Deep Dish

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 25, 2002
Messages
2,191
Reaction score
175
There is a question which has brewing in my mind for the past week. I was going to make a separate thread but I think this thread is appropriate.

Does Stephen Jay Gould's theory of evolution apply to human attraction?

Gould argued evolution operates with the same principle as baseball. Early last century, there were a number of players who averaged over .400. However, the top averages have steadily decreased while the average player has remained at a steady .260. It doesn't mean baseball has gotten worse, but actually better. The steady average means pitchers have improved at the same rate as batters, but the scarcity of hitters averaging .400 means it's harder for the same athletic performance to stand out from improved standards. So, will the same happen with human attraction? Will the "HB" eventually be placed on the endangered species list as the average woman becomes hotter?

(And yes, attractiveness has two universal rules, symmetry and following the Golden Ratio of nature, 1:618. Of course, anything beyond that is subjective.)
 

Mr.Positive

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 13, 2007
Messages
1,855
Reaction score
99
Deep Dish said:
There is a question which has brewing in my mind for the past week. I was going to make a separate thread but I think this thread is appropriate.

Does Stephen Jay Gould's theory of evolution apply to human attraction?

Gould argued evolution operates with the same principle as baseball. Early last century, there were a number of players who averaged over .400. However, the top averages have steadily decreased while the average player has remained at a steady .260. It doesn't mean baseball has gotten worse, but actually better. The steady average means pitchers have improved at the same rate as batters, but the scarcity of hitters averaging .400 means it's harder for the same athletic performance to stand out from improved standards. So, will the same happen with human attraction? Will the "HB" eventually be placed on the endangered species list as the average woman becomes hotter?

(And yes, attractiveness has two universal rules, symmetry and following the Golden Ratio of nature, 1:618. Of course, anything beyond that is subjective.)
Could the answer be that we're just over thinking everything?

Attractiveness is subjective after all..
 
Top