I see the college campus culture of safe spaces and ideology of comfort graduating with most women and continuing with them in the form of their smart phones and the dating apps. On their phones and through their apps, they can create an artificial safe space where they think they can continuously engage an unknown guy for as long as they want until they feel comfortable and want to progress it to a real meetup.
You can see this manifest itself today as most women consider it an entire phase/status of the mating dance to be "talking" to a guy before actually "dating."
But remember, most women don't know or don't want to acknowledge what they most primally emotionally respond to. Sure, the process of "meeting" and "talking" and then dating can lead a woman to find a guy who she is maybe a 7 on a scale of 1 to 10 attracted to, but by virtue of his being willing to placate and indulge her delicate sensibilities and comfort level by progressing through whatever virtual communication hoops she's set up, she'll never be as deeply emotionally attracted to him (and she will in secret resent his malleability and pedestalizing white knight-esque patience) as she will be to a man who she feels instantly attracted to and who refuses to placate and indulge and who instead attempts the most direct contact he can.
I'm a firm believer in being direct and being unwilling to play by a woman's rules to indulge these ridiculous whims. You're interested in what you're interested in - whether that's her number or setting a date on the spot - and your interest is a compliment that should not in ANY way be taken for granted. If she's not willing to act on your limited time offer, you are not sticking around for breadcrumbs or scraps. You're on to the next. It may lower your conversion percentage but in the long run, you're saving yourself time lost from conversing with low-interest fence straddlers. It's just not worth it.
Be direct. Cut through their nonsense. It's worth it in the long run.
You can see this manifest itself today as most women consider it an entire phase/status of the mating dance to be "talking" to a guy before actually "dating."
But remember, most women don't know or don't want to acknowledge what they most primally emotionally respond to. Sure, the process of "meeting" and "talking" and then dating can lead a woman to find a guy who she is maybe a 7 on a scale of 1 to 10 attracted to, but by virtue of his being willing to placate and indulge her delicate sensibilities and comfort level by progressing through whatever virtual communication hoops she's set up, she'll never be as deeply emotionally attracted to him (and she will in secret resent his malleability and pedestalizing white knight-esque patience) as she will be to a man who she feels instantly attracted to and who refuses to placate and indulge and who instead attempts the most direct contact he can.
I'm a firm believer in being direct and being unwilling to play by a woman's rules to indulge these ridiculous whims. You're interested in what you're interested in - whether that's her number or setting a date on the spot - and your interest is a compliment that should not in ANY way be taken for granted. If she's not willing to act on your limited time offer, you are not sticking around for breadcrumbs or scraps. You're on to the next. It may lower your conversion percentage but in the long run, you're saving yourself time lost from conversing with low-interest fence straddlers. It's just not worth it.
Be direct. Cut through their nonsense. It's worth it in the long run.