Vulpine
Master Don Juan
Darwinism.( . )( . ) said:I don't understand what you're trying to get at.
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.
Darwinism.( . )( . ) said:I don't understand what you're trying to get at.
You've said it a hundred times. Maybe a thousand. And every time you say it, you train your brain to freeze the next time she walks into the room.
Leagues are a myth invented by guys who are scared of women.
She's a person. She has bad breath in the morning. She picks songs she can't sing in the shower. She overthinks her own texts.
Walk over. Say something. The league dissolves the second you open your mouth.
Easy pilgrim, no need to bash my alleged ego. I used to be a devout Catholic, and even went to daily mass.speed dawg said:I'm not a fan of evolution at all. I think when things 'evolve', it's really human beings continuously learning lessons and teaching those lessons to the next generations. Animals too, although that's a different level of evolution. Think about it, how does ones' genetics change over a lifetime? I don't believe they can. I also think that anyone who believes humans evolved from an animal are nuts, it's just not possible.
So I have a book filled with full-filled prophecies, makes sense and is basically the only book that has withstood the test of time, as my proof of things. What do you have? A couple of dude's opinions, and your own ego?
Then you have the gall to say there are things beyond our comprehension. Nice.
Well, not just regarding homosexuals, but also the carousel riders (and otherwise crazy chicks) that don't get knocked up while they could. Neither gets to pass their genes.vulpine said:Darwinism
That paragraph about ego was not directed toward you, but rather Tyte `EyEs. See post #35.taiyuu_otoko said:Easy pilgrim, no need to bash my alleged ego. I used to be a devout Catholic, and even went to daily mass.
After reading TONS of books, and doing a lot of independent THINKING, I have come to the conclusion that evolution (slow changes over THOUSANDS of generations) is the best description YET to come even close to describing who we are and how we got here.
And yes, some things, MOST things are WAY BEYOND human comprehension.
The Bible (or any other holy book) is but one attempt at explanation.
Science is another one.
There is ZERO reason to think why the two should be mutually exclusive, UNLESS one's ego demands it be so.
Many great thinkers (compared, to say, keyboard jocks) tend to agree.
Einstein on Religion
(btw, I searched for Einstein's views on anal sex but came up empty.)
She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.
Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.
The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.