Hello Friend,

If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.

It will be the most efficient use of your time.

And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.

Thank you for visiting and have a great day!

George Lucas

cazzie

Don Juan
Joined
Jul 15, 2003
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
http://www.wired.com/news/digiwood/0,1412,...2,68017,00.html

Technology may soon spell doom for the big blockbuster, predicted the king of blockbusters himself -- George Lucas.

Theatrical and licensing revenues from the six-part Star Wars series have topped $13 billion and continue to grow, but Lucas believes the days of such high-budget epics may soon be over.

"I'm not doing $100-million movies anymore," Lucas said on Saturday. "I'm more interested in smaller ones. Each time you do a $100-million movie, the chances are greater that you're not going to make your money back."

He added: "Box office numbers have been going down since World War II. They're on a slide and will continue to be. The profitable areas are now television and DVD, and the entire paradigm is shifting dramatically," Lucas said. "People will always go to theaters, because they will always like a social experience, but I don't think it's going to be as big as it is now."

Lucas said he will not be alone in Hollywood. The growth of home theaters, new delivery mechanisms and alternative viewing devices like mobile phones will inevitably alter moviemaking.

"The big tent-pole movies will be the first victim of the rapid technological changes we're seeing now," he predicted. "We're just not going to see those being made anymore."

The shift from big-screen epics toward television and mobile devices is also inspiring an aesthetic shift, Lucas said.

"There is a difference between how you make things for big screen and small screen. When you're designing for DVD, you tend to end up with more close-ups, and your wide shots aren't so wide. I don't subscribe to that stylistic shift, but a lot of kids making movies now grew up on TV and DVDs -- not films in theaters -- so that's how they make movies. I prefer to make them for the big screen, and they tend to work out alright."

Speaking just two days before the Supreme Court's landmark MGM v. Grokster decision on file-sharing technologies, the longtime proponent of all things digital said Hollywood must figure out how to sell its wares online.

"We're in a transitional period with delivery of material on (the) internet, and piracy is (a) huge factor," he said. "Why pay for something when you can get it for free on opening day? There has to be an international effort. If they don't solve this problem of how to sell over the internet, the business is going to shrink, and what's produced will be more like TV movies. They'll be low budget, and there won't be as many of them."

When asked whether he believes that government should take an increasingly assertive role in legislating filesharing, Lucas pointed to the need for better ways to deliver content in fee-based systems online.

"This is bigger than a question of the role that federal government should take in antipiracy -- it's a social issue," Lucas told Wired News. "We need to convince people that creatives need to get paid or they can't create, and we need to short circuit the idea that all the money goes to corporations. This is an international problem that involves international governments, but also a cultural shift."

Built on the site of a demolished military hospital, Lucas' 865,000-square-foot Letterman Digital Arts Center will be home base for the mogul's electronic game, licensing, promotion and online ventures.

Lucas said the new site will allow workers at Lucasfilm, Industrial Light and Magic, and LucasArts to collaborate more seamlessly.

More than 1,500 people will work at the center, connected by a high-speed fiber optic network that will allow fast, simultaneous collaboration. And while a lot of Lucas' staff will soon be working at the new headquarters, Lucas won't.

The Marin County resident prefers to avoid the pain of the clogged trans-bay commute, and will instead remain ensconced at Skywalker Ranch, where he's currently working on the Indiana Jones sequel and Red Tails, a feature about black fighter pilots in World War II.

"I'm going to spend the next 18 months squaring things away and producing projects I haven't had time to look at for the past few years," he said. "Then I'm going to go off and direct my own little experimental films that won't have anything to do with this company."
 

familyguyfan

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
551
Reaction score
0
Well I'm sure more people would go to the movies if they weren't $10 a ticket. It's outrageous now. It's not even worth it to go unless you know you'll love the movie. Just 3 or 4 years ago movies were still around $7 a ticket, but they've gone up in price drastically.

And if they argue that $10 is what they need in order for them to make a profit, then producers need to stop paying some actors $20 million a movie. That's rediculous. No actor needs that much money per film, and that money would be much better spent elsewhere.
 

Ever onward

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 11, 2004
Messages
968
Reaction score
3
I agree family guy fan, ticket prices have gotten outrageous. But so has the price of everything else.

Anyways, I think George Lucas is correct in that "blockbusters" are on the decline. I think the biggest reason for this is because of the competition. Back in the 70's when the original Star Wars came out, there were maybe a handful of other movie releases during the summer months.

Now there is a new "big name" movie every week. SW Episode III made a ton of money, but there was no way it could continue to dominate box office sales for very long. Competing against Madagascar, Batman Begins, War of the Worlds, Mr. and Mrs. Smith, Fantastic 4, Revenge of the Sith quickly became "last weeks release" and soon dropped off in box office revenue.

At least the last Star Wars movie kicked ass! George Lucas once again made a great movie. Turns out he's not just a flannel shirt wearing, toy salesman after all.
 

Julian

Banned
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
4,765
Reaction score
1,224
i havent been to a movie since 8 mile.

Well i lie i went to a couple flicks at the cheap seats (1.50 a ticket) but those dont count.
 

D!ck Ramsey

Don Juan
Joined
Sep 22, 2004
Messages
158
Reaction score
3
I hate George Lucas.

He made me believe with the first trilogy and I was a diehard StarWars fan for years. Collected the toys/memorabilia and everything. I even kept the faith after Episode 1 & 2 were a horrible let down, telling people that they were just a setup for Episode 3 and that it would rock.

Then I saw the last one and I felt...nothing. The acting sucked, I felt no empathy for Anakin or his stupid wife. General Grievous was supposed to be this badass JediKiller, but they never got into his story. It really was a godawful film and I wish I could have my ten bucks back.

Now when my friends ask me to go see it I tell them to wait till it comes out on TV...not even worth the DVD rental.

If I ever see Mr. Lucas on the street I am gonna shove a plastic lightsaber up his fat ass and hit the switch so I can enjoy the muffled sound....VHROOOOOMMMMMM!!!

The good news is that I recently sold all my StarWars crap on eBay and made off with over $5,000. Hooray for me!
 

Tell her a little about yourself, but not too much. Maintain some mystery. Give her something to think about and wonder about when she's at home.

Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.

diplomatic_lies

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 4, 2002
Messages
4,367
Reaction score
8
Let's say you have 4 people going to watch a movie.

DVD rental - $0.50 per person
Movie ticket: $10 per person

Homemade popcorn: $1
Movie popcorn: $1000 (well not really, but at least $10)


With many people getting really good home theatre systems, there's no motivation to go to the movies anymore. Just go to a friend's house, rent a DVD, and pop it in.
 

squirrels

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 15, 2003
Messages
6,620
Reaction score
182
Age
45
Location
A universe...where heartbreak and sadness have bee
Originally posted by cazzie

"I'm not doing $100-million movies anymore," Lucas said on Saturday. "I'm more interested in smaller ones. Each time you do a $100-million movie, the chances are greater that you're not going to make your money back."

He added: "Box office numbers have been going down since World War II. They're on a slide and will continue to be. The profitable areas are now television and DVD, and the entire paradigm is shifting dramatically," Lucas said. "People will always go to theaters, because they will always like a social experience, but I don't think it's going to be as big as it is now."
No, George. There's a LOT of money still to be made on the big screen. Of course, it helps if the movies you make don't SUCK. :rolleyes:

Arrogant ass...puts out sh!tty movies and then blames a "shift in the media paradigm" on him not making as much money, rather than the fact that the movie industry in general (and Lucas in particular) can't come up with a fresh idea, let alone a good expression of that idea, to save their lives.

Just like the RIAA puts out sh!tty cookie-cutter music and $20 CDs with 2 listenable tracks and blames their sales-slide on "illegal music sharing" when customers rebel.

George has got the right idea of going back to DVD with his movies, but not because that's the way consumers are leaning as opposed to theaters. It's because he just can't make a movie any more that people want to see.

If that's because he wants to get back to more independent films and do things more for art's sake than to entertain people, then that's fine. But direct-to-DVD releases has always been an indicator that a production company or director is completely washed-up...or never was any good to begin with. The reason that the big-screen box office numbers are sliding is because people in this century expect MORE out of their movies and directors like Lucas REPEATEDLY fail to produce.
 

Yotsuya-san

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Jan 11, 2004
Messages
393
Reaction score
1
Location
Maison Ikokku
With Episode III, Mr. Lucas has finally realized that he has long ago exhasted the idea that he's ever had. It's come home to him that he is and always was a one trick pony.

Despite all this talk about a SW tv series prequel to episode IV, I don't see the sense in it. One reason?: Star Trek: Enterprise!

But if he really wants to milk SW for the last drop he'll ever get, then maybe he should do the right thing. Remaster and release the original trilogy on DVD in it's original form! Let the franchise go out on a positive note at least.
 

TinyFzzyKiwi

Don Juan
Joined
Mar 19, 2004
Messages
171
Reaction score
0
Age
36
4 5 and 6 were good movies, but 1 and 2 just sucked. 3 was definatly somewhere in between. It makes sense though, how well are you going to do with 6 movies all having the same basic theme running in each? That and dialogue really isn't his thing, at least in the latest 3 movies.

The action was pretty good though.
 

familyguyfan

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 2, 2005
Messages
551
Reaction score
0
Originally posted by Yotsuya-san

But if he really wants to milk SW for the last drop he'll ever get, then maybe he should do the right thing. Remaster and release the original trilogy on DVD in it's original form! Let the franchise go out on a positive note at least.
Uhhh, isn't that what he just did?
 

TACH

Don Juan
Joined
Sep 3, 2001
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
Location
Small town ,Alabam
George Lucas is a hack. He got lucky with a crap idea. Then he ruins effects for everyone, and turns his films into 2 hours of special effects. Hell, they aren't even special any more.

Of course, the blame can't fit solely on his shoulders, but he really did over do it.
 
Top