Do you think AI security apps will cause PUAs to be banished from nightclubs?

[MatureDJ]

I was reading this, and it got me interested:

This ID Scanner Company is Collecting Sensitive Data on Millions of Bargoers

PatronScan says it sells security. Privacy advocates worry it’s selling mass surveillance.

onezero.medium.com

PatronScan’s services extend beyond just spotting fake IDs, however. In its promotional material, PatronScan claims — without citing a source — that “95% of incidents are caused by 1% of patrons.” When a patron allegedly misbehaves, a staffer can flag their scanned ID in the system, and tag their indiscretion from PatronScan’s list of banned acts: “Assault,” “disturbance,” “drug possession,” “drug trafficking,” “fake ID,” “fighting,” “gang violence,” “public intoxication,” “sexual assault,” “theft,” “private,” or “other.”

My opinion: Macking will be categorized as "other". Chicks will figure out that by complaining about a PUA, he will get on this banned list. It will be OVER for NightGameCels.

 

[2Rocky]

With technology it would be easy to create an "86'ed" list if all the venues were on the same software.

Troublemakers, angry drunks, dine and dashers better watch out. You can't be anonymous in the big crowd anymore.

Hint.....Don't make women complain about your approach and you will be fine...

 

[SW15]

There is no such thing as a NightGameCel. Many men get laid from night game approaching. There are incel men that fail that every type of interaction. You're either incel or you're not.

I would agree that bad approaching would be categorized under "other" or "disturbance".

Most men will be unaffected by PatronScan. Article is nearly 3 years old.

Indoor masking is a much bigger problem affecting night game than PatronScan.

PUAs are near the bottom of the list of concerns for mall security. PUAs doing approaches will be lower on the list of PatronScan concerns.

 

[firstbornunicorn]

Stop posting this garbage