Canada Just Got More Gay

[Desdinova]

Bill C-16 just passed. It's purpose is to protect trans-gender people. Good for them. The next step is to make it into a real law.

So now, if I wanna go get myself a nice solid hard on, all I have to do is put on a wig, a little make-up, head down to the public pool, and watch wet women in the change rooms.

Good job, Canada!

 

[Bible_Belt]

There have been high school athletes recently in the US, who were males who decided to identify as females, so they let them compete in the girl's sports. Texas has wrestling for girls, and one such guy just took the girl's state championship. The same thing happened in Florida at the state track meet. Florida also has a professional mma fighter who is a dude who fights women. From what I hear, he's not even that good of a fighter. He just muscles around his opponents, because he is a guy fighting girls.

 

[Desdinova]

The interesting thing that's happening is it's causing a giant split between LGTBQ and feminism.

http://womanmeanssomething.com/why-bill-c-16-destroys-womens-rights-identity-and-freedoms/

This might possibly be true if there was some definition of what constituted “woman” under the category of gender. But not only is there no criteria for “woman” under the class of gender, Bill C-16 specifically legislates that woman can mean anything. But what almost all our officials and leaders are somehow missing is that if you say a particular thing means anything, you are thereby saying it means nothing. The importance of this cannot be exaggerated. This isn’t psychology or sociology, it is math and logic. Referents need to have something they refer to. Language must point to some reality.

I honestly didn't see this coming. I thought men would bring on war against feminism, but it's the LGTBQ who's doing it. The funny part is it was mainly women who were fighting for the rights of LGTBQ. It's all backfiring.

This creates two problems concerning the identities, protections, and freedoms of female women, some half our population. The first is that it will undermine the value and worth of girls and women everywhere. Whether it is right or not, we do not speak in public of “females”, or “biological females”, we speak of “girls” or “women”. The irony of why we speak this way is because we intrinsically know that women are not just breasts, hips and a vagina. They have value, worth, and attributes beyond their bodies and biology. But if we enshrine in law that “woman” has no distinct value or definition, we cut off discussion and celebration of these supra-biological attributes.

The best part? Our Prime Minister who identifies himself as a feminist is the one helping push this through.

Canada is turning into one hell of a disaster.

 

[Serenity]

The LGBTQ community is crazier than feminists. Feminists at least recognize the fact that there's 2 genders, if there wasn't they couldn't polarize the discussion between men and women the way they do. Now if anyone can be anything (or nothing), then what do feminists attack?

Honestly I think this is kinda hilarious, although there's bad consequences to this. Confusion does not serve anyone.