backseatjuan
Banned
Baba Vanga - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baba_Vanga
She was Bulgarian, so her language is closer to Russian, that is why I translated this from Russian. I could not find a good English translation.
Why am I posting this? Because there is some major sh!t around Syria. Just take a look at it, there is ISIS, there is Turkey+Jordan coalition, there is USA, there is Russia. If you hadn't had your head packed inside your ass for the past few years then you could say something like this:
* USA created ISIS
* Turkey supports ISIS
* Jordan supports ISIS
* USA, Turkey, and Jordan and their indians ISIS is pretty much one and the same
So the question begs an answer. Whose feet will the Syria fall to? Who will win this conflict? Let's say Russia will win:
Then why the Europe will be empty?
Let's say USA (Turkey, Jordan) will win:
Then why the Europe will be empty?
We could assume that ISIS will use chemical weapons, or dirty bombs, but that is not going to be enough to kill off Europe. Maximum a dirty bomb or chemical attack can do is devastate a city like Paris, but not the whole of Europe. Obviously we are speaking of Nuclear apocalypses. There is another Vanga prediction that speaks of chemical rain, and that prediction is about Facusima - in other words, chemical rain is nuclear fallout.
There are NATO nukes all over Europe, those are targeted by Russia. So I think it would be fair to assume that the only way Europe will die off if there is a full scale nuclear response by Russia.
Now, why would Russia use nukes? Russian doctrine is defense, that means that it will be attacked.
Back to Syria. There are forces there, both NATO and Russia. Russia has been invited to conduct air missions against ISIS by Syrian president Assad. Russia is the only legitimate foreign power in Syria, NATO, Turkey, USA, Jordan, has same legitimacy in Syria as ISIS - by law. So the real pretense for conflict escalation will be, the way I see it, some international action, which will make Assad illegitimate.
With Assad's illegitimacy acknowledged through international organization, such as UN, or the way it has been done in Iraq, if NATO itself decided to take action, that is the basis for conflict escalation - meaning, real confrontation between USA and Russia, be it on the ground, or in the air.
Sh!t is bad in Syria now, ISIS aside. Turkey is firing across its border at Syrian army, which is fighting ISIS. Jordan is now entering this conflict, with its planes already in Turkey.
It is hard to say when will this thing escalate into a real confrontation, but I think soon, because this situation can not last longer than 1 year. Syrian army with the help of Russian aviation practically won the conflict with ISIS, and if Turkey+Jordan+USA soon won't act, ISIS will fall, and Syria will get its country back.
I think something major will happen soon - perhaps mid summer, perhaps early fall. Then after US elections will escalate.
Vanga clearly separates WW3 and apocalypse. For me that means that first there will be a small conflict involving nukes that will devastate Europe. Then after it, there will be a full scale ICBM 50 megaton per warhead kill cities in a flash world wide apocalypse.
^^In the spring war will begin on the east. And then after that war will be WW3. And after WW3 apocalypse. People will use chemical weapons, Europe will be empty...«Весной начнется война на Востоке. И тогда придет после неё Третья Мировая. А после и сам апокалипсис. Люди используют химическое оружие, будет пустая Европа…».
^^They ask me often, when will the time come for WW3 and apocalypse in the world? But I always say, not soon. Because Syria hasn't give up yet. Soon it (Syria) will fall to the feet of victor, but the victor will not be who he is.«Меня часто спрашивают, скоро ли придет это время для Третьей Мировой войны и апокалипсиса во всем мире? Но я всегда говорю, что нет, не скоро. Потому что ещё Сирия не пала. Скоро она падет к ногам победителя, но победителем окажется не тот».
She was Bulgarian, so her language is closer to Russian, that is why I translated this from Russian. I could not find a good English translation.
Why am I posting this? Because there is some major sh!t around Syria. Just take a look at it, there is ISIS, there is Turkey+Jordan coalition, there is USA, there is Russia. If you hadn't had your head packed inside your ass for the past few years then you could say something like this:
* USA created ISIS
* Turkey supports ISIS
* Jordan supports ISIS
* USA, Turkey, and Jordan and their indians ISIS is pretty much one and the same
So the question begs an answer. Whose feet will the Syria fall to? Who will win this conflict? Let's say Russia will win:
Then why the Europe will be empty?
Let's say USA (Turkey, Jordan) will win:
Then why the Europe will be empty?
We could assume that ISIS will use chemical weapons, or dirty bombs, but that is not going to be enough to kill off Europe. Maximum a dirty bomb or chemical attack can do is devastate a city like Paris, but not the whole of Europe. Obviously we are speaking of Nuclear apocalypses. There is another Vanga prediction that speaks of chemical rain, and that prediction is about Facusima - in other words, chemical rain is nuclear fallout.
There are NATO nukes all over Europe, those are targeted by Russia. So I think it would be fair to assume that the only way Europe will die off if there is a full scale nuclear response by Russia.
Now, why would Russia use nukes? Russian doctrine is defense, that means that it will be attacked.
Back to Syria. There are forces there, both NATO and Russia. Russia has been invited to conduct air missions against ISIS by Syrian president Assad. Russia is the only legitimate foreign power in Syria, NATO, Turkey, USA, Jordan, has same legitimacy in Syria as ISIS - by law. So the real pretense for conflict escalation will be, the way I see it, some international action, which will make Assad illegitimate.
With Assad's illegitimacy acknowledged through international organization, such as UN, or the way it has been done in Iraq, if NATO itself decided to take action, that is the basis for conflict escalation - meaning, real confrontation between USA and Russia, be it on the ground, or in the air.
Sh!t is bad in Syria now, ISIS aside. Turkey is firing across its border at Syrian army, which is fighting ISIS. Jordan is now entering this conflict, with its planes already in Turkey.
It is hard to say when will this thing escalate into a real confrontation, but I think soon, because this situation can not last longer than 1 year. Syrian army with the help of Russian aviation practically won the conflict with ISIS, and if Turkey+Jordan+USA soon won't act, ISIS will fall, and Syria will get its country back.
I think something major will happen soon - perhaps mid summer, perhaps early fall. Then after US elections will escalate.
Vanga clearly separates WW3 and apocalypse. For me that means that first there will be a small conflict involving nukes that will devastate Europe. Then after it, there will be a full scale ICBM 50 megaton per warhead kill cities in a flash world wide apocalypse.
Last edited: