MatureDJ
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2006
- Messages
- 12,497
- Reaction score
- 5,049
From the conservative columnist of the New York Times, no less!
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/02/opinion/incels-sex-robots-redistribution.html
http://www.overcomingbias.com/2018/04/two-types-of-envy.html
But of course, the Femynocracy is apoplectic about the idea of sexbots:
https://www.salon.com/2018/05/04/sexbots-arent-the-answer-to-misogynist-incel-rage
EDIT: Read through the reader comments; some of the nastiest femynocracy bile you'll ever see.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/02/opinion/incels-sex-robots-redistribution.html
Here is a link to Hanson's article:Well, actually, first it brings me to the case of Robin Hanson, a George Mason economist, libertarian and noted brilliant weirdo. Commenting on the recent terrorist violence in Toronto, in which a self-identified “incel” — that is, involuntary celibate — man sought retribution against women and society for denying him the fornication he felt that he deserved, Hanson offered this provocation: If we are concerned about the just distribution of property and money, why do we assume that the desire for some sort of sexual redistribution is inherently ridiculous?
After all, he wrote, “one might plausibly argue that those with much less access to sex suffer to a similar degree as those with low income, and might similarly hope to gain from organizing around this identity, to lobby for redistribution along this axis and to at least implicitly threaten violence if their demands are not met.”
http://www.overcomingbias.com/2018/04/two-types-of-envy.html
But of course, the Femynocracy is apoplectic about the idea of sexbots:
https://www.salon.com/2018/05/04/sexbots-arent-the-answer-to-misogynist-incel-rage
EDIT: Read through the reader comments; some of the nastiest femynocracy bile you'll ever see.
Last edited: