Night-hawk
Master Don Juan
I recently ordered and started reading this book; and, although I havn't completed it in full, I have been quite enthralled by its brilliance.
This book is a Red-Pill must for guys who wish to extract more insight to the female psyche; pry open their pre-conditioned beta-ness and exorcise the rotten rationale of feminism and its idiotic ideas. Or, to feed their already expanding perceptions of Game.
I picked these samples because, for one, this book was difficult to come across online, and so I have to transfer the writing directly from my hard copy. There are many other samples I could give but these will suffice for now.
To note: this was written back around 1985. In the book you will find Farrell making tons of parallels to women's magazine's and the sublimal effect such media mediums have had on the mass female population.
VIRGINAL SEX
"Each Christmas and birthday I debate between two types of parents for Megan, the daughter of my woman friend: those I think she should have and those I know she'll love. When she was eight to twelve years old there were two things I knew would make it in the "I love" category: unicorns and posters of heroes. This was true of her girlfriends as well. It's taken me all this time to understand the connection. With neither the unicorn nor the male star on the wall did Megan have to deal directly with her sexuality. It was not like having a picture of one of the boys in her class on her dresser. None of the boys in her or her girlfriend's classes could make it to this star status, so Megan and her girlfiend's did not have to deal directly with their sexuality.
Of course, there were different types of male heroes on Megan's wall--or different images representing how her sexuality might eventually be channeled. In the same manner, for boys, different types of performing, sports, scholastics, or stealing--are different kinds of experiments to become heroes, to be wanted BY different types of girls.
Why is it that so many different types of girl's first posters on the wall are male and boys' first posters on the wall are also male and later female? And why are boy's male heroes also male performers? Because a boy must learn to perform--to earn a female. For him, the more attractive the female the less likely she is just magically to come along. He must earn his way to equality with her. So his posters are of male role models: the role he must play to have access to his fantasy female.
When can a boy make the transition to the female on the wall? When he has tried his hand at performing and is ready to make the relatively short transition between fantasizing and being directly sexual. At that point, he usually changes to nude or seminude posters of women. Similarly, a girl's male-performer posters reinforce her unconscious notion that it's fine for the man to do the performing for her. That ideally she can skip the performance stage herself and can "magically musk" or "magically make up" her way to his performance, tame it, and call it love.
She is deciding the type of performer she should be sexual with; he is deciding to perform how to get sex. The bodies the boy puts on the wall are Miss June, Pet-of-the-Month, etc. Not names of real people. Rather, they are interchangable parts. A girl's heroes do not APPEAR like interchangable parts; they have real names. But the moment Michael Jackson fell out of favor with the press, he came off Megan's wall. her heroes ARE actually interchangable parts. Their interchangability is simply better masked, which makes us think better of the female, "that women don't exploit and objectify." Underneath, it's his sex object and her success object.
What is the relationship between the horn on the white horse, the prince on the white horse, and the hero on the wall? The all offer the female child the IDEAL of skipping sex itself, skipping a career, and being "flashdanced" magically to security, adventure, and fame by a male performer.
What are some alternative gifts of posters I consider healthy? What do I buy Megan that I think she should have? Posters of female Olympic gymnasts to tie into her gymnastic interests, a baseball bat, a soccer ball. But more important than buying the baseball bat is using it with her--setting up games with rules that allow her a 60-40 chance of winning if she really tries. So she can become her own hero."
HOW TO MARRY MONEY
"In New York City a therapist and autor teaches a popular course called "Marrying Up." She has written a book of the same name. In San Diego there is a highly popular course called "How to Marry Money." Note that the marriage is to the money--not to a person. I inquired about the percentage of men attending."Oh, I have to warn men," the instructor replied. "They're welcome to attend, but the course is really for women. I mean, it's not relevant to men."
Both courses are taught by women in self-improvement---one is a therapist, the other the director of Human Potential Unlimited. There is no course for men called "Marrying Down." But what would a course parallel to "How to Marry Money" be for men? Would it be "How to Find Great Sex?" No. Because men also give sex--in fact, sometimes they beg to give it. (women attending "How to Marry Money" are not begging to give money equally).
Would it be "How to Pick Up Girls?" No. "How to Pick Up Girls" describes the work a man must do to get someone EQUIVALENT to himself. It implies he is not equal until he does this work. A legitamite equivalent for men would in fact be "How to Marry Money." But that IS the title. And almost no men attend.
What if they gave sexism and no one came?"
HOW TO MARRY MONEY
North Park University 1-15
"it's as easy to fall in love with a rich man as
with a poor one." The fantasy can come true if
you're willing to pay the price in planning, patience,
and persistence. We'll look at where the wealthy are
and how to decide if you have what it takes, prepare
for the search, develop your strategy, make connections,
and enjoy the whole process.
Barbara Jones is a human relations and communication
consultant, a researcher into upwardly mobile marriages,
and an astute observer of the social scene. She directs
Human Potential Unlimited.
Fee $25 one meeting class size 6-15
sec. A: Mon Jan. 14 6:30-9:30
sec. B: Thur Feb. 21 6:30-9:30
This book is a Red-Pill must for guys who wish to extract more insight to the female psyche; pry open their pre-conditioned beta-ness and exorcise the rotten rationale of feminism and its idiotic ideas. Or, to feed their already expanding perceptions of Game.
I picked these samples because, for one, this book was difficult to come across online, and so I have to transfer the writing directly from my hard copy. There are many other samples I could give but these will suffice for now.
To note: this was written back around 1985. In the book you will find Farrell making tons of parallels to women's magazine's and the sublimal effect such media mediums have had on the mass female population.
VIRGINAL SEX
"Each Christmas and birthday I debate between two types of parents for Megan, the daughter of my woman friend: those I think she should have and those I know she'll love. When she was eight to twelve years old there were two things I knew would make it in the "I love" category: unicorns and posters of heroes. This was true of her girlfriends as well. It's taken me all this time to understand the connection. With neither the unicorn nor the male star on the wall did Megan have to deal directly with her sexuality. It was not like having a picture of one of the boys in her class on her dresser. None of the boys in her or her girlfriend's classes could make it to this star status, so Megan and her girlfiend's did not have to deal directly with their sexuality.
Of course, there were different types of male heroes on Megan's wall--or different images representing how her sexuality might eventually be channeled. In the same manner, for boys, different types of performing, sports, scholastics, or stealing--are different kinds of experiments to become heroes, to be wanted BY different types of girls.
Why is it that so many different types of girl's first posters on the wall are male and boys' first posters on the wall are also male and later female? And why are boy's male heroes also male performers? Because a boy must learn to perform--to earn a female. For him, the more attractive the female the less likely she is just magically to come along. He must earn his way to equality with her. So his posters are of male role models: the role he must play to have access to his fantasy female.
When can a boy make the transition to the female on the wall? When he has tried his hand at performing and is ready to make the relatively short transition between fantasizing and being directly sexual. At that point, he usually changes to nude or seminude posters of women. Similarly, a girl's male-performer posters reinforce her unconscious notion that it's fine for the man to do the performing for her. That ideally she can skip the performance stage herself and can "magically musk" or "magically make up" her way to his performance, tame it, and call it love.
She is deciding the type of performer she should be sexual with; he is deciding to perform how to get sex. The bodies the boy puts on the wall are Miss June, Pet-of-the-Month, etc. Not names of real people. Rather, they are interchangable parts. A girl's heroes do not APPEAR like interchangable parts; they have real names. But the moment Michael Jackson fell out of favor with the press, he came off Megan's wall. her heroes ARE actually interchangable parts. Their interchangability is simply better masked, which makes us think better of the female, "that women don't exploit and objectify." Underneath, it's his sex object and her success object.
What is the relationship between the horn on the white horse, the prince on the white horse, and the hero on the wall? The all offer the female child the IDEAL of skipping sex itself, skipping a career, and being "flashdanced" magically to security, adventure, and fame by a male performer.
What are some alternative gifts of posters I consider healthy? What do I buy Megan that I think she should have? Posters of female Olympic gymnasts to tie into her gymnastic interests, a baseball bat, a soccer ball. But more important than buying the baseball bat is using it with her--setting up games with rules that allow her a 60-40 chance of winning if she really tries. So she can become her own hero."
HOW TO MARRY MONEY
"In New York City a therapist and autor teaches a popular course called "Marrying Up." She has written a book of the same name. In San Diego there is a highly popular course called "How to Marry Money." Note that the marriage is to the money--not to a person. I inquired about the percentage of men attending."Oh, I have to warn men," the instructor replied. "They're welcome to attend, but the course is really for women. I mean, it's not relevant to men."
Both courses are taught by women in self-improvement---one is a therapist, the other the director of Human Potential Unlimited. There is no course for men called "Marrying Down." But what would a course parallel to "How to Marry Money" be for men? Would it be "How to Find Great Sex?" No. Because men also give sex--in fact, sometimes they beg to give it. (women attending "How to Marry Money" are not begging to give money equally).
Would it be "How to Pick Up Girls?" No. "How to Pick Up Girls" describes the work a man must do to get someone EQUIVALENT to himself. It implies he is not equal until he does this work. A legitamite equivalent for men would in fact be "How to Marry Money." But that IS the title. And almost no men attend.
What if they gave sexism and no one came?"
HOW TO MARRY MONEY
North Park University 1-15
"it's as easy to fall in love with a rich man as
with a poor one." The fantasy can come true if
you're willing to pay the price in planning, patience,
and persistence. We'll look at where the wealthy are
and how to decide if you have what it takes, prepare
for the search, develop your strategy, make connections,
and enjoy the whole process.
Barbara Jones is a human relations and communication
consultant, a researcher into upwardly mobile marriages,
and an astute observer of the social scene. She directs
Human Potential Unlimited.
Fee $25 one meeting class size 6-15
sec. A: Mon Jan. 14 6:30-9:30
sec. B: Thur Feb. 21 6:30-9:30
