Your list is way too nepotistic. The average greek warrior or hell the average man from the age of WW2 was far more attractive to women. Women are turned on not just by looks, but by a man who is unapologetically a man. The beauty standards of today is too feminized.
Nepotistic?
“the practice of using power or influence to grant jobs, promotions, or unfair advantages to family members”
I am not the father of these men ..lol.
And they did not become sex symbols due to having powerful parents in Hollywood. Their face (and the roles they played) had mass appeal to females. Mainly - their faces.
Your point on being a man has merit - masculinity is very attractive to females.
But don’t be downplaying the most obvious evidence of how high levels of masculinity , high T and alpha traits present .- in
handsomeness of a male.
As that’s what ‘Handsome’ means = highly masculine faced/ looking . (lol.)
A very handsome man has oodles of masculinity/masc power /masc energy and projected Alphaness. It is automatically
projected onto them .
As it is in his genes and displayed on his face.
In his great bone structure and symmetry. And handsomeness.
Rock Hudson was a massive sex symbol for women back in the day. A personification of masculinity. Many knickers wet wettened at the sight of him.
And he was secretly gay.
James Dean possibly also (afaik )
But I do agree with your point to some degree , and try to project masculinity to women in dating. It is a solid strategy. I don’t think an average guy-to-ugly can ‘outgame his face’ tho and get hot women.
Doesn’t work.
and re your statement in bold re “average Greek warriors and average WW2 era men were far more attractive to women (vs these Hollywood sex symbols) “ .. there is no way to
prove that .lol.
Pure speculation and subjective personal opinion that one.
Have you time travelled back and done surveys or something ?
