"I'm Not Looking for Anything Serious Right Now"

When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.

Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.

Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.

The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.

Read more...

Pathetic Simps now turning to watching 'Sleep Streaming' women.

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
10,402
Reaction score
4,070
Fair point, but idk the profile of the average simp hence my question, who are these sad simping guys?

I’m widening the question up to those simps that pay $30K + to OF girls for a chance to meet them ?

as they are all in the same bucket of simping behaviour regardless of $ spent,
For example
Danielle Bregoli, known as Bhad Bhabie (often misheard or referred to as "bad barbie"), earned over $50 millionwithin a single year on OnlyFans and has accumulated upwards of $75 million on the platform.

like why are guys simping ,(either for free w this sleep video or paying for OF )when there is unlimited varieties of porn available.. for free?

I just don’t get the logic or rationale of the simp,
Okay, lets compare porn and sleeping beauty youtube video because they are both free. Why would you call a guy clicking on a youtube video that has a woman sleeping a simp compared to a guy watching porn for free, or what about someone subscribing to a free OnlyFans page or only going for free trials? They are all free to the guy at this point.

How would that translate on principle of being willing to spend money on it, when you can say you can get it for free if they are all free in the first place?
 

"Stop Asking Your Friends What to Text Her"

Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."

You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.

She's been waiting forty minutes.

Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.

Read more...

Cheeky_James

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 16, 2025
Messages
999
Reaction score
438
Age
42
Okay, lets compare porn and sleeping beauty youtube video because they are both free. Why would you call a guy clicking on a youtube video that has a woman sleeping a simp compared to a guy watching porn for free, or what about someone subscribing to a free OnlyFans page or only going for free trials? They are all free to the guy at this point.

How would that translate on principle of being willing to spend money on it, when you can say you can get it for free if they are all free in the first place?
im not sure I understand your point.

OF is not free afaik
Simps are paying lots of money to OF chicks. Like OF stars make stupid money.

What’s the point of watching a chick sleep?
I’d speculate the viewers are imagining her as a girlfriend or something. That’s the difference.

simping is guys giving attention and money in hopes the chick will grow to like them as a person and have a relationship w them, or dreaming they are her BF.
 
Last edited:

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
10,402
Reaction score
4,070
im not sure I understand your point.

OF is not free afaik
Simps are paying lots of money to OF chicks. Like OF stars make stupid money.
I was simply pointing out that not every OF-girl/subscription is the same. If someone went on OF, and subbed on a free-OF-girl or were only hopping free trials, then they are not paying money while using OF. Therefore, if someone is not paying for OF, and someone is watching porn, then aren't they both free?


Cheeky_James said:
What’s the point of watching a chick sleep?
I’d speculate the viewers are imagining her as a girlfriend or something. That’s the difference.

simping is guys giving attention and money in hopes the chick will grow to like them as a person and have a relationship w them, or dreaming they are her BF.
Okay, you are trying "money" to simping. That would at least make it a rational point. This is an irrational type of thread if nobody is paying money directly to the youtube content creator who is posting herself sleeping. Unless you start counting a click on youtube as somehow indireclty paying money and the content creator is bagging money from people clicking on her. But here again, you can't win for losing as the "simp" thing becomes more irrational. People have to worry about their private youtube viewing behaviour or they can be branded a simp. It's okay to click on almost any video, because you are contributing something with each click, but then it comes to looking at a lady content creator, then the guy is somehow a simp. It seems that that sounds very oppressive. This is why threads like this do not make any sense.

People don't even know if someone clicked and watched the whole video to count as a view, or clicked it for 1 minute, etc..... Really silly when you look at it.
 

zekko

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
16,794
Reaction score
10,024
Lol, guys are so messed up, there are so many fetishes that women can make money off if them, without doing anything overly revealing.

Reminds me of that Kayak commercial where the girl is filming herself playing piano with her feet, and another girl tells her "You don't have to make feet content to pay for your trip because Kayak is so cheap" or whatever. I thought that one was funny.

I wonder if some people watch those vids to help them sleep - like relaxation or ASMR videos? I'm sure it's mostly pervs though.
 

Cheeky_James

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 16, 2025
Messages
999
Reaction score
438
Age
42
I was simply pointing out that not every OF-girl/subscription is the same. If someone went on OF, and subbed on a free-OF-girl or were only hopping free trials, then they are not paying money while using OF. Therefore, if someone is not paying for OF, and someone is watching porn, then aren't they both free?
ok yes I get you.
yea they are both for free in that case and neither viewers would be considered simps imo. In that particular comparison.

Okay, you are trying "money" to simping. That would at least make it a rational point. This is an irrational type of thread if nobody is paying money directly to the youtube content creator who is posting herself sleeping. Unless you start counting a click on youtube as somehow indireclty paying money and the content creator is bagging money from people clicking on her. But here again, you can't win for losing as the "simp" thing becomes more irrational. People have to worry about their private youtube viewing behaviour or they can be branded a simp. It's okay to click on almost any video, because you are contributing something with each click, but then it comes to looking at a lady content creator, then the guy is somehow a simp. It seems that that sounds very oppressive. This is why threads like this do not make any sense.

People don't even know if someone clicked and watched the whole video to count as a view, or clicked it for 1 minute, etc..... Really silly when you look at it.
OP is claiming this sleeper chick is making $650 a week somehow of these videos. Not sure how that works or if it’s true tbh.
Afaik it’s hard to monetise on YT ..Need a lotta subs. Maybe he can expand on how she gets income.
 

"She's Out of Your League"

You've said it a hundred times. Maybe a thousand. And every time you say it, you train your brain to freeze the next time she walks into the room.

Leagues are a myth invented by guys who are scared of women.

She's a person. She has bad breath in the morning. She picks songs she can't sing in the shower. She overthinks her own texts.

Walk over. Say something. The league dissolves the second you open your mouth.

Read more...

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
10,402
Reaction score
4,070
OP is claiming this sleeper chick is making $650 a week somehow of these videos. Not sure how that works or if it’s true tbh.
Afaik it’s hard to monetise on YT ..Need a lotta subs. Maybe he can expand on how she gets income.
Yeah, but then that would apply for any video that has an algorithm or formula. If a guy makes good content, or anyone, they can make xyz per week. It means people like the content.

For example, in the case of "study with me" videos, you can search it on youtube. There are both women and male content creators who both get allot of views and then may be making xyz per week. It makes it difficult to argue that it's a simp territory and more like this content creator is creating a video that appeals to a certain niche and is a win-win. The guy is looking at the sleeping woman on the screen and isn't paying anything for it, so he's happy. With enough of those guys, the lady is earning xyz per month, she's happy too. Likelise a gal is looking at a male study with me video and the guy is making money from views, the the gal is happy too. So I don't buy the arguement of "simp" especially on youtube.

If it were, then there wouldn't be guys on there doing it and making money at it too.
Nobody is paying directly to the content creator other than a mouse click.
Since someone on youtube is going to consume videos anyway, someone is going to get paid for that click no matter what video you watch...if you are really worried about that then delete the youtube account so noobody gets paid, duh, lol
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2026
Messages
108
Reaction score
63
ok yes I get you.
yea they are both for free in that case and neither viewers would be considered simps imo. In that particular comparison.



OP is claiming this sleeper chick is making $650 a week somehow of these videos. Not sure how that works or if it’s true tbh.
Afaik it’s hard to monetise on YT ..Need a lotta subs. Maybe he can expand on how she gets income.
Socialblade.com
 
Top