Women will never be who you want them to be.

[Luthor Rex]

Once, when I was a younger man I dreamed of having a woman who would be a companion to me. A woman with whom I could meet the challenges of life, and who I could take comfort in as she could take comfort in me. Someone who, in the clichéd “sickness, health, ricer, poorer” would stay with me and carry me as I would carry her if times got bad.

But women will never be who I want them to be.

Young women throw themselves at “bad boys” and other men who they then complain will not take care of them. Their vaginas get wet at the males who show off a conspicuous amount of power.

That’s what women really love: power, they love it because it’s in a woman’s nature to love power. Power over men and power through men which gives them the security they desire for themselves and their children. Women often like a man’s “dark side” because they see power in it. Who cares the toll that dark-side exacts on men, who cares if it’s right or wrong. For a woman it is in her nature to desire to be fvcked by men with power. There has been no tyrant in history so bloody and no Hollywood star so abusive that women haven’t been lining up around the block to get fvcked by him. Women only want a nurturing man if he is already powerful.

But women will never be who I want them to be.

Mother Nature doesn’t care for human morality; all she cares about is getting your genes to the next generation and spreading them as far and as wide as possible. Finding a man with that “killer instinct” and that a woman can tame is the best way for the girl to accomplish this. That’s why they will take abuse and humiliation from men they think have power, because he has that killer in him and because women want to get ****ed by a powerful man.

It’s also why women generally ignore when their powerful husband has affairs: it’s better to have part of a winner than all of a loser. When feminism “liberated” women it allowed them to let loose their true natures. So now we have a society of serial monogamy, which is really a form of polygamy because only a few high-status males monopolize women during their best reproductive years and leave them as single-mommies. The women realize their dream to all get fvcked by, and have the children of that 10% of the male population women all worship and then maybe find some lower-status male to cuckold and care for her bastard children or make the sate pay for it. The rise of feminism, the unleashing of woman’s base nature, and the prevalence of single-mommies is not a coincidence.

But women will never be who I want them to be.

The author Ayn Rand may have been ****ed up in so many ways but at least she was honest about what women wanted in men. To her credit at least her women characters loved men for the character traits that produce wealth and security and not just the cars and money itself.

Now to unleash my nerd-dom and paraphrase Obi-Wan Kenobi:

“Women were the chosen ones. With the Liberation of Women it was said that they would destroy the barbarity in man, not join it. That they would bring balance to the genders, not leave us in darkness.”

But women will never be who I want them to be.

------------------------------------------------------------------

Forget the Matriarchy and get educated with some recomended readings:

The Evolution of Desire

Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind

The Murderer Next Door : Why the Mind Is Designed to Kill

 

[Nighthawk]

Excellent post.

 

[Permission]

When feminism “liberated” women it allowed them to let loose their true natures. So now we have a society of serial monogamy, which is really a form of polygamy

Yeah that's good insight. Serial monogamy is a by-product of the feminist movement. Shows like Friends or Sex and the City only promote this.

 

[disciple]

Great post man.

I like the way it flowed almost like poetry.

Good points also.

 

[grr]

Hear ye, hear ye.

They'll even admit it... sometimes.

 

[Evan_M]

Just to add that women are always looking for something better or different. In this regard I don't think women are any different than men. I work in the wedding business and it's interesting how I get a sexual vibe off of many girls a couple of months up to a week before their wedding. They almost seem easier to seduce. While no one will agree with me on this but I believe the act of marriage is more about binding the woman to monogamy than it is for the man.

 

[Luthor Rex]

Monogamy was a truce declared among men.

In a polygamous society where men either take the women by force or the women get to choose their mates the same end results happen. You have a society where the top 10% of highly successful, rich, and handsome men have multiple wives.

When one man has 5 wives that means there are 4 men who go without. What you get is an underclass of men who have no wives and no prospect of getting any. And these men become very VERY angry.

Obviously that underclass would outnumber their top rivals. By the numbers the top 10% of men would lose a war if the bottom 90% rallied together.

So monogamy was a truce declared among men so that wide scale conflict over mating... violent conflict I might add... would be avoided.

But women broke that truce a few generations ago. Serial monogamy is the same as polygamy because the high status males will dominate the best reproductive years of a woman's life and then ditches her for a younger model when he can.

What we end up with is what we have: more and more single mommies and more and more bitter women who have been ****ed by every bad boy in the tri-state area.

Then they get upset because no one decent will marry them. But really gentlemen, who wants to marry a *****?

 

[mexican_player2]

yeah man, i had a female friend and she wanted to be my gf but i didnt like her cuz she was a FAT piece of **** and then i was trying to make her to lose weight and taking her to the gym but then i gave up, she would never be what i want her to be

 

[Evan_M]

What we end up with is what we have: more and more single mommies and more and more bitter women who have been ****ed by every bad boy in the tri-state area.

I know what you're talking about. It's like Sharon Stone's character in Casino. Robert DeNiro was a smart and rich cat but he was also a chump. Stone's character used him, never loved him and cheated on him with the slimey likes of Joe Pesci and James Woods. Why? Because they were bad boys. Even when DeNiro started slapping her around later in the film it was too late. Of course not all chicks are this phucked up but I dare say give them the chance to be and they'll jump right in. When I was in college I witnessed many attractive, middle-class gals pull the same shiet. Women are inherently self-destructive creatures in the wrong environment because they can't rationalize their emotions.