seloifter
Senior Don Juan
Ahh, it's been a long time since I wrote a post. However, recently I came across a sort of realization (I wouldn't go so far as to call it an epiphany) about DJism, and thought I would share it with you.
I've summarized it into this one line:
What separates men from women is their dependance on each other.
A long time ago, there was never any need for sites like sosuave.com. There was no need for techniques to seduce women. There was no need for self-alleged "Don Juan"s.
Why? Women weren't an issue. It never really mattered if you could seduce women. You'd easily find a women who needed a laboring (or powerful/rich) man and she'd bear your children. Meanwhile, men had more important things to worry about.
But that's changed now. Getting a woman is challenging. They run the show. They have all this power. All of a sudden, it's not up to them to find and prove themselves us, it's up to us to chase them!
And it's awfully time-consuming.
Think about yourself now. If you could have three wishes, I'm sure that one of them would have something to do with being able to get any woman you wanted. Am I right?
Because you place such an emphasis on finding a woman. "If only I could get women...." blah blah blah.
Long ago, and still now, women were very dependant on men. It brings to mind a joke:
But men, how do they measure success? Who has the most money, the most power, the most knowledge, the most wisdom, the most strength, the most skill - they are the succesful ones. A man who marries a beautiful woman is regarded as lucky, but in a week everyone has forgotten him.
Now, all that seems to be changing. Men are beginning to measure success by how many women they can get! They are beginning to place "sleeping with women" at the top of their priorities list. But why??
You should not have nearly so much dependance on women as they have on you! Otherwise, you are no longer a man. Men and women become one and the same - both horribly dependant on the other.
Think of the greatest men of all time. How concerned were they about women?
Leonardo da Vinco. Died a virgin (had one experience with a man, but that hardly counts).
William Shakespeare. Left his wife.
Oscar Wilde. Homosexual.
Ghenghis Kahn. Didn't give a ****.
They had greater things to worry about than women. Even the great Giovanni Casanova didn't spend all his efforts on women! He loved them, sure, but he didn't spend night and day trying to figure out everything about them.
One of the most infamous DJisms is never to place a woman on a pedestal. But I ask you, what about placing women as a WHOLE on a pedestal? Is that any different?
Can you deny that you don't put them as a whole on a pedestal? If you can, then what are you doing at this site - spending time and effort trying to learn how to best seduce them?
My ultimate point is not to shun women entirely - but not to let your happiness and success be dictated by the amount of women you can screw in your lifetime. If you do, then you are closing the gap between men and women.
Go out, achieve other dreams. Work. Attain power. Reach your ambitions. Be the next Shakespeare, da Vinci, or Kahn - don't be Joe Hitched-for-life. Don't be Tommy skirt-chaser. You may desire women, but don't depend on getting one. There are greater things for men to conquer.
For what used to separate the two, and now destroys man.... is their dependance on the other.
I've summarized it into this one line:
What separates men from women is their dependance on each other.
A long time ago, there was never any need for sites like sosuave.com. There was no need for techniques to seduce women. There was no need for self-alleged "Don Juan"s.
Why? Women weren't an issue. It never really mattered if you could seduce women. You'd easily find a women who needed a laboring (or powerful/rich) man and she'd bear your children. Meanwhile, men had more important things to worry about.
But that's changed now. Getting a woman is challenging. They run the show. They have all this power. All of a sudden, it's not up to them to find and prove themselves us, it's up to us to chase them!
And it's awfully time-consuming.
Think about yourself now. If you could have three wishes, I'm sure that one of them would have something to do with being able to get any woman you wanted. Am I right?
Because you place such an emphasis on finding a woman. "If only I could get women...." blah blah blah.
Long ago, and still now, women were very dependant on men. It brings to mind a joke:
Ahhh, the dependance. The most succesful woman is the one who snags the best man!! Can you believe it?? That's how they measure success!
But men, how do they measure success? Who has the most money, the most power, the most knowledge, the most wisdom, the most strength, the most skill - they are the succesful ones. A man who marries a beautiful woman is regarded as lucky, but in a week everyone has forgotten him.
Now, all that seems to be changing. Men are beginning to measure success by how many women they can get! They are beginning to place "sleeping with women" at the top of their priorities list. But why??
You should not have nearly so much dependance on women as they have on you! Otherwise, you are no longer a man. Men and women become one and the same - both horribly dependant on the other.
Think of the greatest men of all time. How concerned were they about women?
Leonardo da Vinco. Died a virgin (had one experience with a man, but that hardly counts).
William Shakespeare. Left his wife.
Oscar Wilde. Homosexual.
Ghenghis Kahn. Didn't give a ****.
They had greater things to worry about than women. Even the great Giovanni Casanova didn't spend all his efforts on women! He loved them, sure, but he didn't spend night and day trying to figure out everything about them.
One of the most infamous DJisms is never to place a woman on a pedestal. But I ask you, what about placing women as a WHOLE on a pedestal? Is that any different?
Can you deny that you don't put them as a whole on a pedestal? If you can, then what are you doing at this site - spending time and effort trying to learn how to best seduce them?
My ultimate point is not to shun women entirely - but not to let your happiness and success be dictated by the amount of women you can screw in your lifetime. If you do, then you are closing the gap between men and women.
Go out, achieve other dreams. Work. Attain power. Reach your ambitions. Be the next Shakespeare, da Vinci, or Kahn - don't be Joe Hitched-for-life. Don't be Tommy skirt-chaser. You may desire women, but don't depend on getting one. There are greater things for men to conquer.
For what used to separate the two, and now destroys man.... is their dependance on the other.
