The Feminism “boogeyman”.

[( . )( . )]

Give or take men who get laid often don't seem to have a problem with feminism.

Assuming you're not a chick your "theory" is bunk. Western men are boiled frog experiments and literally haven't yet pieced together the threat of the cultural Marxism puzzle (or more importantly the end game behind it). However have a conversation with any blue pill man and it's pretty apparent they instinctively know something is "off".

I'd also almost guarantee I've gotten/can get better quality snatch than you could get in 3 lifetimes yet I have someone invested in the current cultural decay now though so I have to care. I'd probably care anyway because I'm intelligent and have a heightened sense of social/cultural awareness that most people don't possess.

I'm a bit rushed I'll talk more on this later.

 

[Who Dares Win]

Give or take men who get laid often don't seem to have a problem with feminism.

According to your "logic" a man which has a problem with unfair taxes has to be a man unable to gain a good salary.

Why are you here? trying to look cool, posing?

Saying men which are not fine with feminism dont get laid while saying you are fine with that thus implying you get laid? bragging online seriously?

Whats gonna be your next post, will you be going in an anti-gay thread saying that those against it are insecure? or maybe making fun of people with guns calling small d1cked looking to compensate?

Your cvntitude is boring.

 

[VikingKing]

I've used feminism to my benefit before. Now that women make money, you can take that from them, or more so get them to give it to you.

But honestly I'd prefer true equality, which is not what feminism is at all.

Maybe if we had something called "equalitism".

Patriarchy is really best.

But fvck it, society is how it is. Just stomp your morals, and take advantage of women as much as you can.

As long as you get them to give you their money, or agree to do what you want, then its ok.

Remember gents, it is a free market. All women are fair game, for anything.

 

[mrRuckus]

But honestly I'd prefer true equality, which is not what feminism is at all.

Maybe if we had something called "equalitism".

Patriarchy is really best.

The very concept of equality is flawed because you will never, ever have people agree what is equal. And making one thing equal often makes another thing not equal.

Take Title IX. Now I don't know the true details of it, don't care enough so take this loosely but... If male football brings in $10m for a school, and assuming Title IX then says you have to spend $5m of that on women, and $5m on men, that sounds equal, but it's not equal if you go further because: 1. Men brought in that money to begin with so you're unequally distributing it to who earned it, 2. There are probably more male athletes so the dollar per male spent is less than the dollar per female spent. 3. No one cares to watch to watch female sports because it's like watching little league over MLB and no laws or political campaigns will change this.

There's this big movement in video games lately too. The media cries about "tropes against women" and equality and all that nonsense. But where are the female video game makers? The female created companies? Everything is already equal because men made companies, male programmers decided to become programmers while women didn't, and then made male focused games, which were then chiefly bought by men. The unequal part is that women show up and then demand all this women stuff without doing any of the work. Equal would be that women made companies and then made their precious female protagonists (who would then act manly by being action heros with male tough guy personalities to shove 500 Ridleys down our throats lol, but let's ignore that part). Then women complain that there's a 20% - 30% market share (talking about more action based typed games, not MMO's and puzzle games, etc where the audience is larger) of women being ignored, but WHY should things be tailored to the minority?

Hiring 50% men and 50% women at a company to be engineers isn't equal because only 15% or whatever of the population you're drawing from is women so women are disproportionately hired at a higher rate.

And that sort of thing is everywhere. "Equal" is an impossible goal because it is impossible to define.





---
As a funny aside about video games... I have actually seen the fact that it's vastly male enemies that are killed in video games being spun into "it's such misogyny that women don't get to shoot back!" LOL. No fair that women don't get to be represented primarily as cannon fodder and mowed down in the thousands. Can they spin any harder? A few years ago there was an African based zombie game where all the zombies were black and that caused an uproar too. Omg so racist that in Africa zombies would be black. You can't win this sh1t.

 

[VikingKing]

The very concept of equality is flawed because you will never, ever have people agree what is equal. And making one thing equal often makes another thing not equal.

Take Title IX. Now I don't know the true details of it, don't care enough so take this loosely but... If male football brings in $10m for a school, and assuming Title IX then says you have to spend $5m of that on women, and $5m on men, that sounds equal, but it's not equal if you go further because: 1. Men brought in that money to begin with so you're unequally distributing it to who earned it, 2. There are probably more male athletes so the dollar per male spent is less than the dollar per female spent. 3. No one cares to watch to watch female sports because it's like watching little league over MLB and no laws or political campaigns will change this.

There's this big movement in video games lately too. The media cries about "tropes against women" and equality and all that nonsense. But where are the female video game makers? The female created companies? Everything is already equal because men made companies, male programmers decided to become programmers while women didn't, and then made male focused games, which were then chiefly bought by men. The unequal part is that women show up and then demand all this women stuff without doing any of the work. Equal would be that women made companies and then made their precious female protagonists (who would then act manly by being action heros with male tough guy personalities to shove 500 Ridleys down our throats lol, but let's ignore that part). Then women complain that there's a 20% - 30% market share (talking about more action based typed games, not MMO's and puzzle games, etc where the audience is larger) of women being ignored, but WHY should things be tailored to the minority?

Hiring 50% men and 50% women at a company to be engineers isn't equal because only 15% or whatever of the population you're drawing from is women so women are disproportionately hired at a higher rate.

And that sort of thing is everywhere. "Equal" is an impossible goal because it is impossible to define.





---
As a funny aside about video games... I have actually seen the fact that it's vastly male enemies that are killed in video games being spun into "it's such misogyny that women don't get to shoot back!" LOL. No fair that women don't get to be represented primarily as cannon fodder and mowed down in the thousands. Can they spin any harder? A few years ago there was an African based zombie game where all the zombies were black and that caused an uproar too. Omg so racist that in Africa zombies would be black. You can't win this sh1t.

Yup. That's why most colleges and universities dont have wrestling. I think its better for things to be in favor of males. I think males are naturally more moral. I certainly know right from wrong, and tend to do the more moral thing. But im slowly learning its often times better to not be moral.

As long as I'm at the top, I wouldnt mind living in a socialist, or communist world, only if I'm the top guy, or in the top 10%.

This whole feminist/ marxism is nonsense. But if you are smart enough, you cant take advantage of it.

 

[Poop1337]

It's not just feminist who spout out feminist ideology. One of the tenants of my game is taking the ***** off the pedestal and seeing all that gynocentric socialist crap for what it is. Political correctness is not good manners and regardless of what they say it turns you into a beta ***** if you follow that ****. Also a MGTOW can be a PUA. To me MGTOW just means opting out of the systems of control specifically marriage. It doesn't mean no sex although I understand it does for many.

 

[( . )( . )]

Tits the more I think about it, the more I think you are right. Zarky really is a girl.

No doubt. Here's her latest gem.

4 out of 5 women who cheat on their husbands do so because the husband no longer wants to touch them... just FYI.

It's not about hypergamy (which incidentally have you seen zarky flip out over the word "hypergamy"? She hates it.) or the cash and prizes and divorce whisperers in a woman's ear yougoogurrrling it 24/7, it's now because the beta cuck hubby didn't hold her enough

Or how about when she went full retard when she found out Englishman was banging an Asian. You can watch her descent into chick hysteria from page 2, I think by page 3 she ends with her usual "tiny d!ck basement" retort.

http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=208147&page=2

 

[( . )( . )]

That settles it for me. I have never, ever, ever seen a man put down the chance to fvk Asian women simply because "they get attached".

Zarky, you are outed. It makes total sense now.

• This is why you hate MRA's
• This is why you hate Asians
• This is why you make typical man-hating comments like "small d1ck"
• This is even why you hate Rollo
• This is why you subtly blame cheating wives on "un-loving husbands"

You can also add to that list:

• Video games (or more importantly men who play them)
• "Rednecks" and of course Fox news
• Christians
• Traditional marriage
• Gender roles

Gender roles are evil. Evil because they don't account for human individuality.

^^ No she wasn't joking either
http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showpost.php?p=2017110&postcount=17


My guess is it's your run of the mill blue state bull dyke judging by the sh!t that sends her into angry conniption fits. All textbook stuff lezzo's seem to hate.

 

[Zarky]

Nice to see that my power is so great here that I can troll people without even having to post.

Carry on NaughtyNinja... I mean... me.

 

[Tenacity]

The negative effects of feminism have been a HORRIBLE problem in American culture as a whole. The positive effects (which is what the movement was based on) was all about displaying how women could contribute MORE to society than just cooking, cleaning and managing children. I totally agreed with the notion that women could contribute more and it's been proven that they can over and over, perform in certain positions at or above their male competition.

But the negative effects of feminism is all about DESTROYING the positive traits of masculinity to loop everything masculine into one broad label of "oppression." As a result, the family structure has been destroyed, the government has replaced the father, marriages don't last longer than 5 years on average, boys (especially black boys) grow up without a father which leads to all SORTS of social issues, etc., etc.

Plus the entire notion of this "thug" attraction came from the negative effects of feminism as well, it's another ploy to destroy TRUE masculinity. TRUE masculinity focuses on wisdom, knowledge, creativity, building and emotional control, all qualities that create a LEADER of a household and community. The thug is the opposite of all of these qualities, he embraces being ignorant, doesn't produce anything, he is emotional as HELL and will shoot a person for looking at him in the wrong way, etc. Women will beat their chest and talk about how SEXY these qualities are because if more men become like the THUG to impress the women, eventually the women will surpass the men as a whole and take their desired spot at the TOP. In some form or fashion, this has already happened in Black America, and it's not that far from happening in Latino and White America.

 

[logicallefty]

Nice to see that my power is so great here that I can troll people without even having to post.

Carry on NaughtyNinja... I mean... me.

I have known you were a woman for a while. ( . )( . ) and I had a private conversation about it not too long ago.

This whole thread has been one of the most entertaining ever.

The part I find funniest of all is that how even under attempts of stealth a woman can only go for so long without spewging all of her emotional goon babble all over the place and giving herself away.

Lack of this kind of control is thus the reason why we haven't had a woman in the White House yet because women can't "keep their cool" even in critical times there they absolutely have to. Zarky's posts on here are living proof of this.

 

[( . )( . )]

Carry on NaughtyNinja... I mean... me.

Weird how naughtyninja in his insanity not only adopted all the words you continually overuse "incel" , "wimp", "bitter" and "misogyny" but all of your smiley faces and passive aggressive forms of making a non-argument.

Also strange how naughtyninja linked back to your sh!tty blog 3 times. (After I let everyone else know it was you posting under a different name)

Also strange he too now has adopted a weird obsession with Rollo, Roosh and Roissy and all things red pill just like you. Especially those evil MRA.

Nice try.

Nice to see that my power is so great here that I can troll people without even having to post.

Thing is you do post your poisonous sh!t, thousands of times as a matter of fact and always very careful to offset with some mild "advice" so nobody becomes too suspicious or you hide it with "I just want the puzzy".

Don't flatter yourself. It's more about the damage you're doing to noobs finding this place and wanting a break from the poison they just left.

 

[( . ) ( . )Zarky]

Are ( . )( . ) and Zarky ever going to get a room then eventually shack up together? Its long overdue. Or will ( . )( . ) never stop playing the beta f@g to his lover PlayHer_Man?

 

[jimmy18]

The Sad Truths of Internet Trolls:

1.Trolls are immune to criticism and logical arguments. True trolls cannot be reasoned with, regardless of how sound your logical argument is.
2.Trolls do not feel remorse like you and me. They have sociopathic tendencies, and accordingly, they delight in other people having hurt feelings.
3.Trolls consider themselves separate from the social order.
4.Trolls do not abide by etiquette or the rules of common courtesy.
5.Trolls consider themselves above social responsibility.
6.Trolls gain energy by you insulting them.
7.Trolls gain energy when you get angry.
8.The only way to deal with a troll is to ignore him, or take away his ability to post online.

 

[Tenacity]

It looks as though this thread is a Troll thread, and jimmy nice list but far too often the word "Troll" does get thrown around on the Internet from just simple disagreements on topics. I've had women on other forums say I was "Trolling" when I would disagree on the concept of marriage being this great and wonderful "thing" today, or when I would speak out on some of the off the wall behavior women would display. So sometimes the word "Troll" can be used to as a way to silence someone's alternative opinions and view points.

I tend to agree with the notion that a true Troll is one that is just buffooning around on the internet without any seriousness to them whatsoever.

 

[( . )( . )]

That may be true but it goes a bit deeper than just "trolling" for zarky.

http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=206611

http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=205014

http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=219172

http://www.sosuave.net/forum/showthread.php?t=219164

She's been doing this for years at various "red pill" sites. I think she just really really hates the manosphere and every couple of months when her hatred reaches critical mass she flips out and makes a bunch of different accounts to vent.

 

[Desdinova]

The Sad Truths of Internet Trolls:

1.Trolls are immune to criticism and logical arguments. True trolls cannot be reasoned with, regardless of how sound your logical argument is.
2.Trolls do not feel remorse like you and me. They have sociopathic tendencies, and accordingly, they delight in other people having hurt feelings.
3.Trolls consider themselves separate from the social order.
4.Trolls do not abide by etiquette or the rules of common courtesy.
5.Trolls consider themselves above social responsibility.
6.Trolls gain energy by you insulting them.
7.Trolls gain energy when you get angry.
8.The only way to deal with a troll is to ignore him, or take away his ability to post online.

You forgot one thing...

9.Trolls are automatically drawn to their own 5hitty threads that they created under their previous usernames

Therefore... THREAD CLOSED.