JohnyTheArrow
Senior Don Juan
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2014
- Messages
- 467
- Reaction score
- 135
Does it makes sense ? You are you. You arent your child or your wife.
I'm talking about life of health not some minor stuff.Men are socially programmed and conditioned to give up life and health.Society prizes this as 'heroic' and 'brave' I claim it is ... stupid.It is useful for society but it is deadly for you.
If you lose female or child.You can always find new female and make new child.If you loose life - you are dead.Game over.Your sacrifice doesn't matter actually.You don't play in this game anymore.Female and child may have feel gratitude ... or whatever ... bring flowers to your grave ... whatever ... it doesnt matter.You are dead.DEAD.
I remember the famous Titanic scene when main hero sacrifices for female, commits suicide, so she can live.She has so much gratitude.He is hero.When in fact he should pushed her off the wood, live,find other female have happy life and children.Life has ultimate value - gratitude has no value if you are dead.
Even sacrifice of life for own children makes little sense.You can always make new children.And your children arent you, you are unique.Your child is somebody else.There is no guarantee your child will love you or support you.
Some interesting stories to think about ...
1. When mongols invaded Russia once they captured family,they liked to play cruel games.
Said to wife - We will kill your children OR your husband, 'choose'.
She said ... 'kill my children'.
Puzzled mongols asked 'why?'
'My husband will make me new children. I can survive without children but I will not survive without husband'.
Shocked mongols let whole family free.
2. There is escimo story told to europeans when they arrived... once family was trapped on ice.They could save a man OR they could save his woman and child.They saved a man. Europeans couldnt understand ...
'WHY you saved a man and not woman and a child?'
'We could save woman and child but they would die anyway - there would be nobody to bring food for them'
3. Göring: Why, of course, the people don't want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally, the common people don't want war.
--
Now ... before you call me jaded and cynical ... I claim such mindset is hardcore alpha.Women and children are disposable assets - because they can be replaced.You can not be replaced.
I'm talking about life of health not some minor stuff.Men are socially programmed and conditioned to give up life and health.Society prizes this as 'heroic' and 'brave' I claim it is ... stupid.It is useful for society but it is deadly for you.
If you lose female or child.You can always find new female and make new child.If you loose life - you are dead.Game over.Your sacrifice doesn't matter actually.You don't play in this game anymore.Female and child may have feel gratitude ... or whatever ... bring flowers to your grave ... whatever ... it doesnt matter.You are dead.DEAD.
I remember the famous Titanic scene when main hero sacrifices for female, commits suicide, so she can live.She has so much gratitude.He is hero.When in fact he should pushed her off the wood, live,find other female have happy life and children.Life has ultimate value - gratitude has no value if you are dead.
Even sacrifice of life for own children makes little sense.You can always make new children.And your children arent you, you are unique.Your child is somebody else.There is no guarantee your child will love you or support you.
Some interesting stories to think about ...
1. When mongols invaded Russia once they captured family,they liked to play cruel games.
Said to wife - We will kill your children OR your husband, 'choose'.
She said ... 'kill my children'.
Puzzled mongols asked 'why?'
'My husband will make me new children. I can survive without children but I will not survive without husband'.
Shocked mongols let whole family free.
2. There is escimo story told to europeans when they arrived... once family was trapped on ice.They could save a man OR they could save his woman and child.They saved a man. Europeans couldnt understand ...
'WHY you saved a man and not woman and a child?'
'We could save woman and child but they would die anyway - there would be nobody to bring food for them'
3. Göring: Why, of course, the people don't want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally, the common people don't want war.
--
Now ... before you call me jaded and cynical ... I claim such mindset is hardcore alpha.Women and children are disposable assets - because they can be replaced.You can not be replaced.