I have this 22 yr old I know. Had sex with her in the past, but she is in one of those phases of "self discovery" where she has made a vow to only have sex within the confines of a committed relationship.
I know she is interested in a relationship, and I let her know that her little "born again virgin" game doesn't fly with me.
We had some communication issues with this issue, but I believe that she finally understands where I am coming from, and I agreed to basically "see where it goes".
Now I fully realize that a LTR is pretty much out of the question with this girl. But I am still prepared to "explore my opportunities" with her.
This would be a LDR where she's in COLLEGE in an a major, MAJOR party area. I'm not stupid enough to think that a 22 yr old college chick would be faithful and would cut herself off to opportunities if she is "with" me.
The thing is....I am considering a "relationship" with this girl.
I know that the only way it would progress on her end is if she had a commitment. Thing is, I know how it works. If I were to commit to her and be FAITHFUL to her, next thing you know she has met prince charming who lives 10 minutes away, and I'm history.
Soooooo......all I have to do is way the word, and I have a hot 22 yr old college chick for a "g/f". Now there is no way IN HELL I'm going to cut off my opportunities on a local level to "commit" to a chick who lives three hours away.
Basically, this chick wants to live the fantasy of having a devoted, committed relationship with someone, regardless of distance, age, etc.
But I know different. I know the score. I know how stuff like this plays out.
I know that she will eventually find "love" outside the confines of our "arrangement".
So, going into this with this knowledge, I am obviously "taking advantage" of a woman by accepting her proposal without regard for honoring the commitment.
So how do you reconcile the two?
You KNOW the score. College chicks WILL party. I would be stupid to believe otherwise.
So if I enter into a "commitment" with a woman whom I have reasonable assurance will "cheat", am I the SOB for getting involved with her without regard for our "commitment"?
I know she is interested in a relationship, and I let her know that her little "born again virgin" game doesn't fly with me.
We had some communication issues with this issue, but I believe that she finally understands where I am coming from, and I agreed to basically "see where it goes".
Now I fully realize that a LTR is pretty much out of the question with this girl. But I am still prepared to "explore my opportunities" with her.
This would be a LDR where she's in COLLEGE in an a major, MAJOR party area. I'm not stupid enough to think that a 22 yr old college chick would be faithful and would cut herself off to opportunities if she is "with" me.
The thing is....I am considering a "relationship" with this girl.
I know that the only way it would progress on her end is if she had a commitment. Thing is, I know how it works. If I were to commit to her and be FAITHFUL to her, next thing you know she has met prince charming who lives 10 minutes away, and I'm history.
Soooooo......all I have to do is way the word, and I have a hot 22 yr old college chick for a "g/f". Now there is no way IN HELL I'm going to cut off my opportunities on a local level to "commit" to a chick who lives three hours away.
Basically, this chick wants to live the fantasy of having a devoted, committed relationship with someone, regardless of distance, age, etc.
But I know different. I know the score. I know how stuff like this plays out.
I know that she will eventually find "love" outside the confines of our "arrangement".
So, going into this with this knowledge, I am obviously "taking advantage" of a woman by accepting her proposal without regard for honoring the commitment.
So how do you reconcile the two?
You KNOW the score. College chicks WILL party. I would be stupid to believe otherwise.
So if I enter into a "commitment" with a woman whom I have reasonable assurance will "cheat", am I the SOB for getting involved with her without regard for our "commitment"?