azanon said:
Actually, I suspect it's mild paranoia (on your part).
You might be right, but when you read screeds like JT's here can you blame me? I've never approached what I offer here from the perspective of trying to garner fame or create some cult of personality. As I stated above, I've never made a dime from anything I've written about intergender dynamics here or anywhere else. I don't get off on adulation and I certainly don't presume to be some God-like authority on women. In fact I'm a bit dumbfounded by JT's accusations. If anything, I'm one of the most criticized and scrutinized members of this forum. I've locked horns with you, JOPHIL, Collosus, Zekko, A-Unit, STR8UP, VU, all Men who's opinions, experience and insight I respect, over theories, ideas, observations, behaviors, reasonings and the conclusions drawn from all of them. Some I concur with and even adopt, others I might disagree with, but the importance is in the exchange.
I get a lot of PMs from people suggesting I start my own blog along the lines of Roissy, but I wont do so because it's too one sided. It limits the exchange of ideas between people. I prefer a forum precisely because I don't want a blog that's only an echo chamber full of sycophants. I also prefer SoSuave to the likes FastSeduction or RSD forums, because they tend to be more about PUA techniques and scripts than any real introspect into the social fundamentals and the building blocks as to why they do or do not work. Too many guys are just happy to watch the TV, I want to know how it works.
azanon said:
If I'm debating someone I know to be ignorant, I wouldn't bat an eye using one to "strengthen my argument". For what it's worth, I believe the technical name is "Ad Hominem".
Fair enough, and I would do the same, however, online I can be anyone I choose to be to a certain extent. KARMA, Rogue (a.k.a. Deep Dish), STR8UP and a few other local SS members know me personally. We've had dinners, been to clubs, promo events I've done, etc. They know what I do for a living, they know the car I drive, what my wife looks like, but after all of that they have to take anything I tell them about my past experiences at face value. You can do a background check about my credentials for some things, but when I say I was a minor rock star in the late 80s and early 90s, banging strippers and so on, you kind of have to take my word for it. You know me already from my online persona, and as I said there are a few members here who know I'm being honest about it, but what do you really know about me? What do you really know about a 53 y.o. guy like JOPHIL, who I'd deduce has at least 11 years more experience than I do? You have to take our word at face value to varying degrees.
While I will admit that it's useful to know you're arguing with someone lacking in pertinent experiences, or to know what their personal biases may be, those deficits are are often revealed in their opinions and the conclusions they come to.
JT7890 said:
,..all I will ask you is how in the hell do you know what type of "success" that Rollo has? That's my point, you don't. And because you don't know what type of success he has, it shows the flaws of the "Sosuave Community" for propping up a guy as a "EXPERT" when you don't have a clue who he is.
What would you like to know? What could I do to prove to you that I'm the 'real deal'? Produce a book? Start a seminar? Give you the Face Book profiles of the 40+ women I banged 20 years ago? Would you like a copy of my birth certificate, marriage license and university degrees? I could give you all of this and more and all you'd do is find some angle to prove your own bias. As I stated above, a great deal of hate is fueled by false premises. Concocting convenient scenarios, imagining the worst of your enemies, and reinterpreting their successes are a salve for the burned ego. If I linked you to a picture of myself and I looked like
this guy your response would be "what a douchebag, of course he gets chicks, but they're all bar skanks and ho's". If I linked a picture of my self and I looked like
this guy your response would be "OMG, WHO THE ƒUCK WOULD TAKE ADVICE FROM THIS CHODE?!!"
You see, it makes no difference who I am, what matters is the validity of my ideas. I don't have to prove sh!t to you, and no one else does either. I have posted countless threads and made too many posts to remember about "field experience" and using Game, or drawing from my own life experiences to make a point, and so have many other members, but NONE OF THAT IS DIRECTLY VERIFIABLE ON THE INTERNET.
JT7890 said:
,..when "Sosuave" gets together and creates theories what are the basis of these theories? Are they coming from a guy's PERSONAL experience? Are they coming from a scientist? Are they coming from a paraphrase of another "seduction expert?"
If I provably had multiple doctorates in behavioral psychology and human physiognomy you'd STILL find some reason to discredit my ideas, because they conflict with your very small world. People trust me. They benefit from my advice and put my "theories" into practice. I'm open to correction and adjusting those same ideas.
JT7890 said:
The assumption behind Sosuave is that majority of women operate the same, I call a bluff.
Bullsh!t. This was just recently covered in your own thread.
Rollo Tomassi said:
Romantic seduction has never been one-size-fits-all. In fact this is expressly spelled out in the introduction of the Art of Seduction by Robert Greene. You can't just blindly expect one style of seduction to work for all types of women - that's why it's called an Art. Being a good artist of any sort requires time, discipline, an ability to improvise, creation, adaptation, attention to detail, etc. There are certain basic foundational principles women adhere to (hypergamy for instance) either due to social convention or biology, but the good seductive artist uses these as a basis for an individual seduction. For instance, the seduction of a church mouse and a goth chick require two separate seductive approaches, but they'll both be influenced by the underlying influences common to all women (i.e. hypergamy, etc.). A Man's Alpha prowess will appeal to those biological foundations, but his approach in seduction needs to be measured by the conditions presented by his target.
You lose. Pay up.