Communism is a political and economic system that seeks to create a classless society in which women, are owned and controlled by the community. Each man takes as he needs. No marriage, all share as needed or wanted. The tribe cares for the young, the father is the tribe. The mother is the mother. The men do not shame the woman because they receive no shame for her actions. This leads to a society that does not advance because competition is the mother of advancement.
The theory is that men are not protective of the sex, they are protective of status. If the status is not being competed for then the man does not really care as long as his needs are met. When a woman is loyal to a man that is a form of status.
Do we really hate that the woman is shared or that we are shamed when it happens? Sex with another man's woman against his wish is the ultimate mogging or insult in our cultures. This causes us to be angry at the woman for the shame her actions give us. This is a wrongism as the mogging is from another man, the woman is just a woman. While in a communist way we would agree to share and not compete with each other allowing the men and woman as they will.
Not sure what I think about this, but this seems to be the argument.
Very thoughtful post. Thanks. Communism is not a bad thing as long as there is no government attached to it. Again, when you live in a small tribe you all have to come together as a
commune aka community or else you all die. Communism got a bad wrap when governments and certain people who were really fascists started calling themselves communist. All humans evolved from a communist past where everyone shared everything ( the tribe).
My argument is that marriage and monogamy is artificial. Marriage is an invention in order to create social classes and to pass down property.
The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State (Penguin Classics) Friedrich Engels argues that it was the state that used marriage for its own benefit. We see this today. The state promotes marriage because it keeps men enslaved in the tax farm called civilization.
In summary: We come from tribes were the sexual restrictions on women were minimal. There was no reason to stress too much about it. You cant be that much of a slut when everyone knows everyone. Paternity is not an issue when there is no property. Women are more promiscuous in small groups ( this is why we advocate social group game instead of cold approach). Women were not made for the restrictions of puritanical monogamy. This is why we are have such a hard time with their behavior now. Women are more promiscuous than we give them credit for.
When they say they want to go through a hoe phase they are just acting on their natural biology. This is not the result of some feminist liberal plot. The feminist just accelerated this bs and made it toxic. In the natural world this "hoe phase" would have been expressed in her mating with multiple ( but not every) men in the tribe.
Again I am not saying that women are as promiscuous as men because they are not. I am not saying they fukk EVERY member of the in group they are a part of. They dont do that. But they do have the capability to be involved in love triangles where they get fukked by multiple men at different times. This is the basis of the love triangle.
So we should stop being surprised when they divorce us in 7 yrs because they got the tingles for another man. We should not surprised when she has a high body count ( in tribal times she would have never been able to get a body count that high anyway). We should not be surprised when she has slept with women and gang bangs etc. They are naturally like this. Its just that civilization put this on overdrive. Kinda like how humans have always loved calorie dense food like sugar but civilization gave us the means to gorge ourselves to death on it.