Originally posted by Wyldfire
Originally posted by Dominant
1. I'm not referring to SS.
2. There was something wrong in his game. If he was really skilled, he would have broke down those walls of casual sex. I've done it before. I've also failed before, but I know that if a different guy with a different look ran the same game, he would have succeeded.
You're wrong. There was absolutely nothing wrong with his "game". He failed because of my values and morals, which are unbreakable. I don't drink at bars, either. I go out to sing karaoke or dance, not to drink. No guy would have been able to get me to have casual sex.
So, if you were really attracted to this guy, then that wasn't the problem. His skills weren't good enough.
Wrong again...I liked everything about him. In fact, if I had of been interested in a relationship with someone at that point I would have been very interested in dating him. The chemistry was all there...but again...I don't do the casual sex thing and I wasn't interested in a relationship at that time in my life.
And no, I'm not calling you a slut. Just telling you that you can get to a place of submission with a man, a point where he makes you feel so comfortable that you can't resist as much as you initially would.
Well, no one could know me and my history and ever consider me a slut. At this time I have abstained from sex for over 4 years. I never feel "uncomfortable" around anyone. I am very confident and secure. I don't have any hang ups over sex or anything...but I DO have incredibly strong morals and values. Even the most successful "player" on the planet would never be able to get me to have casual sex with him. My values and morals are too strong.
It's actually a pretty geniune connection for a short period of time. Not like a no strings attached, non-emotional freak fest. It's actually quite nice.
It may be nice for people with no self-respect or substandard morals...but it's not my style and is nothing I have any interest in.
Can you feel me?
Nope...
Ok, there's no point debating about whether YOU could have sex "relatively easy" or not. There's no way you're going to say that you would, there's no way I'm going to budge and say you wouldn't.
I've seen too much, read too much, and experienced too much to say honestly that there are women out there that are incapable of having sex relatively quickly with a man, if not a blatent ONS.
But I gotta comment on a couple of things.
You're wrong. There was absolutely nothing wrong with his "game".
I'm sorry, but there is no way you can state this. You cannot tell whether or not the guy displayed perfect game. There are so many variables to trying to pick-up a girl. There are so many methods. There's SS, GWM, MM, and so many openers and routines and all that. How can you state this guy did the absolute best job possible? You cannot.
That would be like watching Michael Jordon play basketball and stating "There was nothing wrong with his game tonight." Even on his best performance, there's always SOMETHING wrong, SOMETHING he could have done better. A pass he could have made, a shot he could have taken, something.
So there was SOMETHING wrong with the guy's game. In all honestly, if a group of the best players were to dissect it, they would have probably found plenty wrong.
It may be nice for people with no self-respect or substandard morals...but it's not my style and is nothing I have any interest in.
Alright that's just straight a f'd up thing to say. So people who have sex relatively quickly or easily have no self-respect and sub-standard morals?
NONSENSE! I have dated the sweetest, nicest, most moral girls and have had sex with them quickly. No drinking, no drugs, no exploitation.
They've had plenty of self-respect and are going places in life.
Plenty of the guys here have girlfriends who, at some time in their lives, have had sex with someone relatively quickly.
There's absolutely NOTHING wrong with these women. They had sexual desires, and when the opportunity came they took it. It was not a reflection of their self-respect or morals. They didn't do physical or emotional harm to themselves or others. They didn't stick a needle in their arm (a lack of self-respect) or point a gun to someone's head (a lack of morals).
Don't give people a guilt-trip where one is not needed, or even called for.
They are still human beings with self-respect and at least standard morals.
Lastly, whether or not women all women at some time in their lives are capable of having sex relatively quickly and easily, I'm sticking to my guns. I believe all women are capable. Not that they will all do it, because of lack of opportunity, but they are all capable.
I really don't think people at this site welcomes those types of viewpoints, even if they are accompanied by facts or even scientific evidence.
Susan Shapiro Barash, a gender studies professor (AND A WOMAN), states that 60% of women would cheat.
60% of women would cheat. 60% of women, if they were in a relationship, would have a sexual experience with someone else.
Stay with the logic on this.
So, what percentage of women would do something less immoral, like have a sexual experience with someone relatively quickly and easily WITHOUT having a partner to cheat on.
I would say damn near 100% due to my experiences in life. But go ahead and make your own estimation based on what you know. I'd say most of you would fall between the 90-100% range.
In the end, I only advocate the truth. Sum up your experiences with women, and learn from science and from those men who are most successful with woman. Screw opinions and what people think is the truth. Seek the truth yourself.
God makes sure people who think they're wise fall flat on their ass.
-Dominant
I written on this issue many times - the hor mindset is a dangerous mindset and there is such a thing as morality! You will only learn when one of these hors drags you through the mud