By now, you've probably had a decent amount of boyfriend rejections.
Were they of the "you're a great guy, but I have a boyfriend" variety?
Or was it more like "...I have a boyfriend..."?
If you are getting numbers easy, and they are "meh" about seeing you again, then I imagine you are being too friendly - not sexual enough.
Also the vast majority of girls should stop. Perhaps that's a presence thing. Like I say, too friendly. For example.....
The difference should be that we don't look like sh*t, have a more commanding presence, and don't have the same needy energy that they do.
If a woman mistakes anyone for one of those guys, it's often just piss poor game. They are the example in what not to do.
If you are getting numbers by being friendly and non-threatening, expect your number closes to take a dip when you start experimenting with being a sh*tlord. But you'll get more sex long-term by being more of sexual threat.
--------------
As for messaging, it helps to text more often than in other types of game. If I get a number from going out on a Friday night, I usually won't initiate over the phone until Sunday at the earliest.
A girl from the street seems to need more than that. Probably each day or two. And the initial text on the same day that you meet.
I like: "It was nice to meet you today, wonderer". But there are many options. You have to find what suits you.
I like it because it's a closed message that doesn't require a reply. Then, if she replies, you can follow it up there and then, or pace things slower by leaving a follow up until the next day.
If she doesn't reply, I'd just ping her the next day regardless.
Not sure. I only have Krauser's book.
Which book are you referring to?
Daygame mastery has a massive section on text-game that goes for like 100 pages. Seriously best thing I've ever read on the subject.
Had a girl last year that went between England and Italy, and needed to use long-game. That book got me through