or are they sub-men. i mean there is a reason muslims keep their women in check and deprive them from lots of rights. and if you go back in history the whole world basically kept women down under.
there was a reason for that. i dont think men woke up one day and just said "HEY LETS MAKE LIFE MISERABLE FOR WOMEN FROM NOW ON"
according to some people womens lib of the 20`s was greatly fueled by the rockefellers so they can tax the other half of the population( since women werent allowed to work hence cant be taxed)
and as soon they liberated themselves they started to challenge the social status quo specially in the 60`s(feminism).
still to this day women have shown that they would rather share a successful man than to have a loser to themselves( charlie sheen living with 2 girls)
are women equal to us? do you view them as an equal?
there was a reason for that. i dont think men woke up one day and just said "HEY LETS MAKE LIFE MISERABLE FOR WOMEN FROM NOW ON"
according to some people womens lib of the 20`s was greatly fueled by the rockefellers so they can tax the other half of the population( since women werent allowed to work hence cant be taxed)
and as soon they liberated themselves they started to challenge the social status quo specially in the 60`s(feminism).
still to this day women have shown that they would rather share a successful man than to have a loser to themselves( charlie sheen living with 2 girls)
are women equal to us? do you view them as an equal?