Originally posted by Bible_Belt
whoops, Marvin Bush, not Neal. Marvin was a principal in the now-defunct Stratesec, Inc. which had the security contract for the World Trade Center.
And you do know that the Bush family fortune came from Grandpa Prescott's trading with the Nazis, right? That's not a theory. Congress had to pass the Trading with the Enemy Act to get Prescott to stop selling raw materials to the Nazis even after the US joined WWII.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1312540,00.html
That's quite a stretch to say that the Bush family fortune came from trading with Nazi's.
Again, do some research before jumping to such wild conclusions.
Your agenda is starting to show here.
Why don't you just come out and say what everyone knows your trying to say?
BTW, isn't the UK Guardian the newspaper that initiated a letter writing campaign on behalf of its readers urging Ohio residents to vote for Kerry?
(Yes, it was:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/story/0,13918,1326033,00.html)
No agenda there, right?
No bias there, right?
Also, from the article:
"The Anti-Defamation League in the US is supportive of Prescott Bush and the Bush family. In a statement last year they said that "rumours about the alleged Nazi 'ties' of the late Prescott Bush ... have circulated widely through the internet in recent years. These charges are untenable and politically motivated ... Prescott Bush was neither a Nazi nor a Nazi sympathiser."
Later in the article:
"More than 60 years after Prescott Bush came briefly under scrutiny at the time of a faraway war, his grandson is facing a different kind of scrutiny but one underpinned by the same perception that, for some people, war can be a profitable business."
So the ADL says Prescott Bush was neither a Nazi or a Nazi sympathizer, yet the writer(s) of the article go on to speculate and editorialize and insert their own biased opinion, which reveals their (anti-war) agenda.
And, what does this have to do with 9-11?
Face it, you guys are chasing ghosts, and looking quite foolish while doing so.
And, from the UK Guardian article that I linked to:
"Air America, the upstart liberal radio counterweight, is still in its infancy, but it can be picked up in parts of Ohio and other battleground states. Listen to the flagship show presented by the leftwing humourist Al Franken at
www.airamericaradio.com, also between 5pm and 8pm on weekdays, then call in on 001 866 303 2270 (neither call will be free from the UK). Franken's focus yesterday was the "absolutely shameless" behaviour of the conservative media in America."
So, they are promoting Al Franken talking about the "shameless conservative media" in America.
Let's look at the facts.
68% of the American media's campaign donations go to Democrats.
Source:
http://opensecrets.org/industries/indus.asp?Ind=B02
Yet, Franken is calling the American media "conservative" and the Guardian UK doesn't even question it, and they even go so far as to promote him and his opinions.
Again, no bias there, right?
I can easily go in and pick apart the UK Guardian article you posted in much the same manner.
Might just do so when I have some more time, but then, you'd probably just change the subject again as well as the argument, and we'd go round and round and round.
Again, read the Popular Mechanics article I posted that debunks the 9-11 myths/conspiracy theories.
They are unbiased, credible, non-agenda driven and also source their claims.
That's more than I can say of the conspiracy theory crap that's being posted here as "evidence"