guru1000
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2007
- Messages
- 5,376
- Reaction score
- 4,401
Hence, the CEO paradigm, a natural leader of both men and women, cannot lead a simple relation. Why?She isn’t shaping.
Hence, the CEO paradigm, a natural leader of both men and women, cannot lead a simple relation. Why?She isn’t shaping.
True and yet not completely so.Another key concept that leads us to the "Pursue only your passions, and they will come/stay." I call this the CEO paradigm.
While too busy "taking over the world" in pursuance of thy passions, who is no longer a source of your attention? Might be intriguing at first, but in LTR context, it fails.
I, too, have fall victim to this many times in LTRs. Working around the clock in furtherance of power, exhausted during any free time, the CEO pays her little/no attention, leave her feeling unappreciated--neglecting her companionship need. Hence, "fvck the pool boy" dynamic arises or--if a woman has greater integrity--disrespect followed by the end.
Let's keep going.True and yet not completely so.
When a man reaches that stage, he has already has amassed sufficient skills in leadership, but yet somehow "fails" to lead his own wife/women ?
In truth, if a man looks deep within himself, it's because he no longer desires her as he once did nor is she really up to his standards, in effect it's a subconscious soft-dismissal.
The ability of a woman to amuse me - that's her value and type.Let's keep going.
Can this same CEO-type man value someone (as much) whom has already been won or "conquered"? If so, describe what type of woman this would be if at all possible.
Do you think that your count has the same effect?What number of partners is too many? Prob dont mater as much if you want to plate her.
Its also prob age and person dependent but still wondering.
The older i get the higher a women count will be in general, so i guess a man cant have too many expection of a women to have a low count
My count might have some similar effect, but since we are wired differently then women it make me wonder.Do you think that your count has the same effect?
What you wrote would be the feminine imperative thinking.
If a man is the single point emanation and the woman is made and built differently. Her frame molds for survival. So how can the effect be the same. Women acting and being men?
So how many men would it take before she can no longer pair bond at an intimate level?
Sorry, I don’t follow the Feminine Imperative directives. On a personal note, I don’t care because I will never marry her or tie her to my finances.
It is self evident that the older a woman gets the more baggage she gets. In relationship to a man. Now a man who was trashed by a woman can have quite the baggage as well. He still blames the women and her disregard for how much he gave to the relationship.However im not against some kind of LTR, so im wondering the effect of too many **** on her bonding capacity
It is self evident that the older a woman gets the more baggage she gets. In relationship to a man. Now a man who was trashed by a woman can have quite the baggage as well. He still blames the women and her disregard for how much he gave to the relationship.
I asked a woman once about why does an older woman carry so much baggage. She was not offended at all but simply said....”men”
Now I know she meant her frustration with men. But how many times has a woman thought, “oh this new guy is the $hit!” Because of how he makes her feel. Then two months later...”Oh never mind, he wasn’t what I thought he was.” Boom. Bonded then went flat. Multiply that by 12.
She’s ruined herself. Then you pile the Feminine Imperative on top and then how everything is a man’s fault or the cult of men in general.
So a guy pair bonds and then gets trashed like garbage because of his raising. Then he decides to despise women for it. Baggage.
The last two “dates” I was on there were small things through conversations that pointed everything to someone else’s fault. Baggage.
Most if not nearly all of women, are incapable of self examination. They will think something critical about themselves and let tell her girlfriends and then “WHAT? Girl you are awesome. He didn’t deserve you. You are the $hit. He’s just a stupid man.” Boom!!! Any self evaluation is nullified by the imperative.
So yes. Every time she bonds, a little bit more of herself is flushed down with the tampon.
It’s rather sad if you think about it.
Even more reason to offer her redemption, femininity and protection. Let her mold to you if she can. There’s a living hell between her ears.
That's a nice one hahahaMost if not nearly all of women, are incapable of self examination. They will think something critical about themselves and let tell her girlfriends and then “WHAT? Girl you are awesome. He didn’t deserve you. You are the $hit. He’s just a stupid man.” Boom!!! Any self evaluation is nullified by the imperative.
More numbers means the better is it for the man.The older i get the higher a women count will be in general, so i guess a man cant have too many expection of a women to have a low count
Unbeknownst to me this topic has already been touched on by POOK, although he has put it in a more palatable language but it's similar to the views that I've posted here.Suggesting that one sex loves more than the other is a fools errand, and a naive one at that. Can a man ever love a woman like she loves a child? Can a woman ever be ready to sacrifice herself for the love of her man?
To even compare these is a fundamental misunderstanding of gender dynamics and psychology. Each sex loves differently and thus operate in different ways with their compassion and love towards each other. Some of you sound like Hitler, claiming some sort of superiority over a lesser race, due to the differences which you do not understand.
The most important thing to keep in mind is that you should live with an open heart, even if it hurts. To close yourself from the world, and from the opposite sex because of any of the millions of reasons people do this (usually unresolved childhood issues) is robbing yourself one of the things that make us human.
This becomes increasingly difficult as you lay more partners. This may be a shocker to some, but it affects men and women the similarly. You could argue that it affects women more, but it does affect men as well. High partner counts offer insight into alternative partners, therefore they tend to become dissatisfied more easily (sound familiar?). I have heard that much more here than with any of my peers outside of SS, regardless if they are married or single.
With each partner, people tend to add new items to the checklist. What they fail to realize is that the list becomes so long, it is bound for failure. So they then relinquish their opportunities for meeting the impossible standards they have developed, and continue to blindly look while claiming they are "waiting for the right person". Why date 1 or more new partners a week if you are not actually looking for someone or looking for love? Why commit so much time and effort to pursuing the opposite sex if it is not a priority in your life?
https://www.sosuave.net/forum/threads/unplug-yourself-from-the-pickup-matrix.126357/#post-1185593
@Ranger supplicating/calibrating as your described was discussed above
Good points. People are forgetting that the sexes are complementary of one another. One biological imperative isn't better than the other because mother nature doesn't care about your personal perspective. Sosuavers often complain about female solipsism but I'm seeing a lot of male solipsism on this thread. If we're breaking this all down to biology and evolution then "love" isn't anything more than a biochemical program your mind is running on you for your survival and reproduction. Same goes for your idea of a soul. You're just part of the big simulation like she is, and you can't have it both ways.Suggesting that one sex loves more than the other is a fools errand, and a naive one at that. Can a man ever love a woman like she loves a child? Can a woman ever be ready to sacrifice herself for the love of her man?
To even compare these is a fundamental misunderstanding of gender dynamics and psychology. Each sex loves differently and thus operate in different ways with their compassion and love towards each other. Some of you sound like Hitler, claiming some sort of superiority over a lesser race, due to the differences which you do not understand.
The most important thing to keep in mind is that you should live with an open heart, even if it hurts. To close yourself from the world, and from the opposite sex because of any of the millions of reasons people do this (usually unresolved childhood issues) is robbing yourself one of the things that make us human.
This becomes increasingly difficult as you lay more partners. This may be a shocker to some, but it affects men and women the similarly. You could argue that it affects women more, but it does affect men as well. High partner counts offer insight into alternative partners, therefore they tend to become dissatisfied more easily (sound familiar?). I have heard that much more here than with any of my peers outside of SS, regardless if they are married or single.
With each partner, people tend to add new items to the checklist. What they fail to realize is that the list becomes so long, it is bound for failure. So they then relinquish their opportunities for meeting the impossible standards they have developed, and continue to blindly look while claiming they are "waiting for the right person". Why date 1 or more new partners a week if you are not actually looking for someone or looking for love? Why commit so much time and effort to pursuing the opposite sex if it is not a priority in your life?
Maybe it would be more beneficial to provide examples of men illustrating this "deep love" that you seem to believe is only possibly demonstrated by men? That would provide some context as to your definition of the word "love", and help guide the proper examples illustrated by women.Well then, when can we see any clear examples of the supposedly deep love (other then being induced by the feminine imperative) by a woman from either any women here or from the feminine imperative fanboys who enjoys grovelling and then feels proud as being the best groveller - the best PUA trickster ?
I'm sure one of you can come up with something - I'm counting on it to put it to the test.
Aside to the women here, saying "I love you" or "I just absolutely loveeee" this handbag or that high heels or the beta provider doesn't equate deep love, it's actually love for ur survival (lifestyle). Care to dispute me ?
It's littered around the forums, various postings of men sacrificing everything he has to offer; body, soul and mind. Even in this thread it's already been spoken of.Maybe it would be more beneficial to provide examples of men illustrating this "deep love" that you seem to believe is only possibly demonstrated by men? That would provide some context as to your definition of the word "love", and help guide the proper examples illustrated by women.
The demonstration of love towards partners is multi-faceted and doesn't follow a narrow spectrum of actions or words. It is unique to each individual, and not necessarily quantifiable or observable as you seem to suggest. If you could provide explicit examples of what "you" consider love, I am sure an equal example could be provided of a woman displaying those affections for a man.